Multimodal Machine Learning-Based Technical Failure Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Daijiro Tomii MD , Isaac Shiri PhD , Giovanni Baj PhD , Masaaki Nakase MD , Pooya Mohammadi Kazaj MSc , Daryoush Samim MD , Joanna Bartkowiak MD , Fabien Praz MD , Jonas Lanz MD, MSc , Stefan Stortecky MD, MPH , David Reineke MD , Stephan Windecker MD , Thomas Pilgrim MD, MSc , Christoph Gräni MD, PhD
{"title":"Multimodal Machine Learning-Based Technical Failure Prediction in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement","authors":"Daijiro Tomii MD ,&nbsp;Isaac Shiri PhD ,&nbsp;Giovanni Baj PhD ,&nbsp;Masaaki Nakase MD ,&nbsp;Pooya Mohammadi Kazaj MSc ,&nbsp;Daryoush Samim MD ,&nbsp;Joanna Bartkowiak MD ,&nbsp;Fabien Praz MD ,&nbsp;Jonas Lanz MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Stefan Stortecky MD, MPH ,&nbsp;David Reineke MD ,&nbsp;Stephan Windecker MD ,&nbsp;Thomas Pilgrim MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Christoph Gräni MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Technical failure is not uncommon and is associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR. However, predicting procedural failure remains challenging due to the complex interplay of clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The objective of the study was to develop and validate a data-driven prediction model for technical failure of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), using multimodal information and machine learning algorithms.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In a prospective TAVR registry, 184 parameters derived from clinical examination, laboratory studies, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, computed tomography, and procedural measurements were used for machine learning modeling of TAVR technical failure prediction. For the machine learning algorithm, 24 different model combinations were developed using a standardized machine learning pipeline. All model development steps were performed solely on the training set, whereas the holdout test set was kept separate for final evaluation. Technical success/failure was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition, which differentiates between vascular and cardiac complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2,937 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR, the rate of cardiac and vascular technical failure was 2.4% and 7.0%, respectively. For both categories of technical failure, the best-performing model demonstrated moderate-to-high discrimination (cardiac: area under the curve: 0.769; vascular: area under the curve: 0.788), with high negative predictive values (0.995 and 0.976, respectively). Interpretability analysis showed that atherosclerotic comorbidities, computed tomography-based aortic root and iliofemoral anatomies, antithrombotic management, and procedural features were consistently identified as key determinants of VARC-3 technical failure across all models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Machine learning-based models that integrate multimodal data can effectively predict VARC-3 technical failure in TAVR, refining patient selection and optimizing procedural strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73527,"journal":{"name":"JACC advances","volume":"4 10","pages":"Article 102168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772963X25005939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Technical failure is not uncommon and is associated with unfavorable outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR. However, predicting procedural failure remains challenging due to the complex interplay of clinical, anatomical, and procedural factors.

Objectives

The objective of the study was to develop and validate a data-driven prediction model for technical failure of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), using multimodal information and machine learning algorithms.

Methods

In a prospective TAVR registry, 184 parameters derived from clinical examination, laboratory studies, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, computed tomography, and procedural measurements were used for machine learning modeling of TAVR technical failure prediction. For the machine learning algorithm, 24 different model combinations were developed using a standardized machine learning pipeline. All model development steps were performed solely on the training set, whereas the holdout test set was kept separate for final evaluation. Technical success/failure was defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 definition, which differentiates between vascular and cardiac complications.

Results

Among 2,937 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR, the rate of cardiac and vascular technical failure was 2.4% and 7.0%, respectively. For both categories of technical failure, the best-performing model demonstrated moderate-to-high discrimination (cardiac: area under the curve: 0.769; vascular: area under the curve: 0.788), with high negative predictive values (0.995 and 0.976, respectively). Interpretability analysis showed that atherosclerotic comorbidities, computed tomography-based aortic root and iliofemoral anatomies, antithrombotic management, and procedural features were consistently identified as key determinants of VARC-3 technical failure across all models.

Conclusions

Machine learning-based models that integrate multimodal data can effectively predict VARC-3 technical failure in TAVR, refining patient selection and optimizing procedural strategies.
基于多模态机器学习的经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者技术故障预测。
背景:技术失败并不罕见,并且与TAVR患者的不良结果相关。然而,由于临床、解剖和手术因素的复杂相互作用,预测手术失败仍然具有挑战性。目的:本研究的目的是利用多模态信息和机器学习算法,开发并验证经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)技术故障的数据驱动预测模型。方法:在前瞻性TAVR注册表中,184个参数来自临床检查、实验室研究、心电图、超声心动图、心导管检查、计算机断层扫描和程序测量,用于TAVR技术故障预测的机器学习建模。对于机器学习算法,使用标准化的机器学习管道开发了24种不同的模型组合。所有模型开发步骤都单独在训练集上执行,而保留测试集则单独用于最终评估。技术成功/失败是根据瓣膜学术研究联盟(VARC)-3定义来定义的,该定义区分了血管和心脏并发症。结果:在2937例连续行TAVR的患者中,心脏和血管技术衰竭的发生率分别为2.4%和7.0%。对于两类技术故障,表现最好的模型具有中高判别性(心脏:曲线下面积:0.769;血管:曲线下面积:0.788),具有较高的负预测值(分别为0.995和0.976)。可解释性分析显示,在所有模型中,动脉粥样硬化合并症、基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉根和髂股解剖、抗血栓管理和手术特征一致被认为是VARC-3技术失败的关键决定因素。结论:整合多模态数据的基于机器学习的模型可以有效预测TAVR的VARC-3技术故障,细化患者选择和优化手术策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JACC advances
JACC advances Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信