Psychometric Properties of the Everyday Ageism Scale: Results from the Experiences of Aging in Society Project.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Julie Ober Allen
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Everyday Ageism Scale: Results from the Experiences of Aging in Society Project.","authors":"Julie Ober Allen","doi":"10.1177/08982643251378211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To comprehensively evaluate the psychometric properties of the relatively new Everyday Ageism Scale. <b>Methods:</b> Data were from the 2021-2023 <i>Experiences of Aging in Society</i> project (<i>N</i> = 237, ages 50+, multiracial/multiethnic, 72.6% female). We assessed the multidimensional structure, reliability, and validity of the Everyday Ageism Scale. <b>Results:</b> Confirmatory factor analysis generally substantiated the three-factor structure of the Everyday Ageism Scale: exposure to ageist messages, ageism in interpersonal interactions, and internalized ageism. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were satisfactory for the full scale and two of the three subscales. The scale demonstrated acceptable validity for convergence within measure, convergence criterion with three other scales used to measure ageism, and prediction of concurrent health (number of chronic physical health conditions, mental health condition). <b>Discussion:</b> Findings establish the Everyday Ageism Scale as a valid and reliable, multidimensional scale, while recommending ongoing attention to messages subscale limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":51385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Health","volume":" ","pages":"8982643251378211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08982643251378211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To comprehensively evaluate the psychometric properties of the relatively new Everyday Ageism Scale. Methods: Data were from the 2021-2023 Experiences of Aging in Society project (N = 237, ages 50+, multiracial/multiethnic, 72.6% female). We assessed the multidimensional structure, reliability, and validity of the Everyday Ageism Scale. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis generally substantiated the three-factor structure of the Everyday Ageism Scale: exposure to ageist messages, ageism in interpersonal interactions, and internalized ageism. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were satisfactory for the full scale and two of the three subscales. The scale demonstrated acceptable validity for convergence within measure, convergence criterion with three other scales used to measure ageism, and prediction of concurrent health (number of chronic physical health conditions, mental health condition). Discussion: Findings establish the Everyday Ageism Scale as a valid and reliable, multidimensional scale, while recommending ongoing attention to messages subscale limitations.

日常年龄歧视量表的心理测量特征:来自社会老龄化经验项目的结果。
目的:综合评价新编制的日常年龄歧视量表的心理测量特征。方法:数据来自2021-2023年社会老龄化经历项目(N = 237,年龄50岁以上,多种族/多民族,72.6%为女性)。我们评估了日常年龄歧视量表的多维结构、信度和效度。结果:验证性因子分析总体上证实了日常年龄歧视量表的三因素结构:年龄歧视信息暴露、人际交往中的年龄歧视和内化年龄歧视。完整量表和三个分量表中的两个分量表的内部一致性和重测信度令人满意。该量表在测量内收敛、与用于测量年龄歧视的其他三个量表的收敛标准以及同时健康(慢性身体健康状况的数量、精神健康状况)的预测方面显示出可接受的效度。讨论:研究结果确立了日常年龄歧视量表作为一个有效和可靠的多维量表,同时建议继续关注信息子量表的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Health is an interdisciplinary forum for the presentation of research findings and scholarly exchange in the area of aging and health. Manuscripts are sought that deal with social and behavioral factors related to health and aging. Disciplines represented include the behavioral and social sciences, public health, epidemiology, demography, health services research, nursing, social work, medicine, and related disciplines. Although preference is given to manuscripts presenting the findings of original research, review and methodological pieces will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信