Basic knowledge and understanding of palliative care among nurses working in a group of tertiary care hospitals.

Megha Pruthi, Sushma Bhatnagar, Abhaya Indrayan, Gaurav Chanana, Indu Thakur
{"title":"Basic knowledge and understanding of palliative care among nurses working in a group of tertiary care hospitals.","authors":"Megha Pruthi, Sushma Bhatnagar, Abhaya Indrayan, Gaurav Chanana, Indu Thakur","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2024.0063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous education and training is needed for nurses to overcome barriers of accessing palliative care in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An evaluation of baseline knowledge about the basics of palliative care was conducted using a validated questionnaire, Palliative Care Knowledge Questionnaire-Basic (PCKQ-B), as a pretest. A comprehensive 1 day Continuing Nursing Education (CNE) and workshop was conducted for nurses from hospitals across Delhi-NCR. The effectiveness was evaluated using a pre and posttest method with PCKQ-B. PCKQ-B is a 25-question test developed in India and rigorously validated for nurses working in tertiary care hospitals in India. Descriptive analysis was performed for demographics and to summarise the data and paired t-test to compare pre and post data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 nurses participated in the CNE and took pre and post tests. Nurses came from six tertiary care private hospitals across Delhi-NCR. A total of 79% of the participants were females with a mean age of 25.61 years. The mean score of the participants increased from 14.5 in the pre CNE to 18 in the post CNE which was statistically significant (p=0.000). Nurses scoring >60% (16 out of 25) questions correctly increased from 27% in pre-test to 70% in post-test. The question that was correctly answered by the minimum number of participants (13%) in pre-test was 'use of placebos is appropriate in some types of pain' highlighting the common myth and poor clinical practice, which only improved to 35% even in post test. While it was encouraging to find out that more than 88% participants were aware that the 'severity of pain determines the method of pain treatment' and 'prognosis should always be clearly communicated' even in pre-test while the percentage increased to 99% in post test.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baseline knowledge about palliative care remains dismal, but engaging learning interventions like CNE and workshops can bring significant improvement to palliative care understanding of the nursing staff. However, this must be followed up with regular refresher classes and courses to build a strong framework with a learned workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":94055,"journal":{"name":"International journal of palliative nursing","volume":"31 9","pages":"439-445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of palliative nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2024.0063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous education and training is needed for nurses to overcome barriers of accessing palliative care in India.

Methods: An evaluation of baseline knowledge about the basics of palliative care was conducted using a validated questionnaire, Palliative Care Knowledge Questionnaire-Basic (PCKQ-B), as a pretest. A comprehensive 1 day Continuing Nursing Education (CNE) and workshop was conducted for nurses from hospitals across Delhi-NCR. The effectiveness was evaluated using a pre and posttest method with PCKQ-B. PCKQ-B is a 25-question test developed in India and rigorously validated for nurses working in tertiary care hospitals in India. Descriptive analysis was performed for demographics and to summarise the data and paired t-test to compare pre and post data.

Results: A total of 102 nurses participated in the CNE and took pre and post tests. Nurses came from six tertiary care private hospitals across Delhi-NCR. A total of 79% of the participants were females with a mean age of 25.61 years. The mean score of the participants increased from 14.5 in the pre CNE to 18 in the post CNE which was statistically significant (p=0.000). Nurses scoring >60% (16 out of 25) questions correctly increased from 27% in pre-test to 70% in post-test. The question that was correctly answered by the minimum number of participants (13%) in pre-test was 'use of placebos is appropriate in some types of pain' highlighting the common myth and poor clinical practice, which only improved to 35% even in post test. While it was encouraging to find out that more than 88% participants were aware that the 'severity of pain determines the method of pain treatment' and 'prognosis should always be clearly communicated' even in pre-test while the percentage increased to 99% in post test.

Conclusion: Baseline knowledge about palliative care remains dismal, but engaging learning interventions like CNE and workshops can bring significant improvement to palliative care understanding of the nursing staff. However, this must be followed up with regular refresher classes and courses to build a strong framework with a learned workforce.

三级医院护士对姑息治疗的基本知识和理解。
背景:在印度,护士需要继续接受教育和培训,以克服获得姑息治疗的障碍。方法:采用经验证的《基本姑息治疗知识问卷(PCKQ-B)》作为前测,对患者的基线姑息治疗基础知识进行评估。对来自德里- ncr各医院的护士进行了为期1天的全面的继续护理教育(CNE)和讲习班。采用PCKQ-B前测法和后测法评价疗效。PCKQ-B是在印度开发的一项有25个问题的测试,针对在印度三级护理医院工作的护士进行了严格的验证。对人口统计数据进行描述性分析,总结数据,配对t检验比较前后数据。结果:共有102名护士参加了CNE,并进行了前后测试。护士来自德里- ncr的六家三级私立医院。总共79%的参与者是女性,平均年龄为25.61岁。参与者的平均得分从CNE前的14.5分增加到CNE后的18分,差异有统计学意义(p=0.000)。护士答对bb60 %(25题中16题)的比例从测试前的27%增加到测试后的70%。在前测试中,最少参与者(13%)正确回答的问题是“在某些类型的疼痛中使用安慰剂是合适的”,这突出了常见的神话和糟糕的临床实践,即使在后测试中,这一比例也只提高到35%。令人鼓舞的是,在测试前,超过88%的参与者意识到“疼痛的严重程度决定了疼痛的治疗方法”和“预后应该始终清楚地传达”,而在测试后,这一比例增加到99%。结论:护理人员对姑息治疗的基础知识仍然很差,但参与学习干预,如CNE和研讨会,可以显著提高护理人员对姑息治疗的理解。然而,这必须伴随着定期的复习课程和课程,以建立一个有学问的劳动力的强大框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信