Validity and Reliability Study of the Holistic Care Scale in Oncology Patients in Türkiye.

IF 1.4 Q2 NURSING

Journal of Holistic Nursing Pub Date : 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1177/08980101251377813

Ece Kurt, Evşen Nazik

{"title":"Validity and Reliability Study of the Holistic Care Scale in Oncology Patients in Türkiye.","authors":"Ece Kurt, Evşen Nazik","doi":"10.1177/08980101251377813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The present study aimed to adapt the Holistic Care Inventory (HCI) to the Turkish society and assess its validity and reliability. Design: A methodological research design was used for this study. Methods: There was conducted with 200 patients hospitalized in the oncology clinic of a city hospital in Türkiye. For the scale, language validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability tests were evaluated respectively. Findings: The HCI consists of four subscales and 37 items. All path coefficients for the items in the scale were found to be over 0.40, and the conditions required for convergent and discriminant validity were met. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient was 0.974, with 0.952 for the \"physical care\" subscale, 0.942 for the \"sensitive care\" subscale, 0.945 for the \"interpretive care\" subscale, and 0.947 for the \"spiritual care\" subscale. A significant, positive, and moderate relationship was found between the HCI and the Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Care Scale. Conclusions: The HCI was concluded to be a valid and reliable measurement instrument for the Turkish society and is recommended to be used in patient populations when needed.","PeriodicalId":51615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"8980101251377813"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08980101251377813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The present study aimed to adapt the Holistic Care Inventory (HCI) to the Turkish society and assess its validity and reliability. Design: A methodological research design was used for this study. Methods: There was conducted with 200 patients hospitalized in the oncology clinic of a city hospital in Türkiye. For the scale, language validity, content validity, construct validity, and reliability tests were evaluated respectively. Findings: The HCI consists of four subscales and 37 items. All path coefficients for the items in the scale were found to be over 0.40, and the conditions required for convergent and discriminant validity were met. The Cronbach's Alpha coefficient was 0.974, with 0.952 for the "physical care" subscale, 0.942 for the "sensitive care" subscale, 0.945 for the "interpretive care" subscale, and 0.947 for the "spiritual care" subscale. A significant, positive, and moderate relationship was found between the HCI and the Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Care Scale. Conclusions: The HCI was concluded to be a valid and reliable measurement instrument for the Turkish society and is recommended to be used in patient populations when needed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

rkiye肿瘤患者整体护理量表效度与信度研究。

目的：本研究旨在使整体护理量表（HCI）适应土耳其社会，并评估其效度和信度。设计：本研究采用方法学研究设计。方法：对浙江省某市立医院肿瘤门诊住院的200例患者进行调查。量表分别进行语言效度、内容效度、构念效度和信度测试。结果：HCI由4个分量表和37个条目组成。量表中所有条目的通径系数均大于0.40，满足了收敛效度和区分效度的条件。Cronbach's Alpha系数为0.974，其中“物理护理”子量表为0.952，“敏感护理”子量表为0.942，“解释护理”子量表为0.945，“精神护理”子量表为0.947。HCI与纽卡斯尔护理满意度量表之间存在显著的、正的、中等的关系。结论：HCI被认为是土耳其社会有效和可靠的测量工具，并建议在需要时在患者群体中使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Holistic Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Manuscripts are solicited that deal with the processes of knowledge development and application including research, concept analysis and theory development, practical applications of research and theory, clinical case studies and analysis, practice applications in general, educational approaches and evaluation, and aesthetic expressions of holistic knowledge. While the journal seeks to support work grounded in evidence, the editorial philosophy suggests that there are many diverse sources of “evidence” beyond the realm of what is called “empirical” and that many methods are appropriate for discovering evidence and generating knowledge.