Lois Dankwa, Darrell J Gaskin, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Kelly M Bower, Jill A Marsteller
{"title":"A Typology to Describe Community Context and Population Health Activities in Local Public Health Delivery Systems.","authors":"Lois Dankwa, Darrell J Gaskin, Keshia M Pollack Porter, Kelly M Bower, Jill A Marsteller","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a typology of approaches to population health activities that local health departments (LHDs) and their partners take to address community health needs, and identify associated contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Using latent class analysis, we categorized how jurisdictions prioritize and perform 10 population health activities. With a latent class regression model (multinomial logistic regression), we examined the effect of county-level community characteristics on LHD class membership. Models include primary care provider ratio, income inequality ratio, social membership association ratio, percent non-Hispanic Black, and percent non-English speakers.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Local public health delivery systems across the US.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>600 LHDs.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>LHD population health approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Information statistics revealed a 3-class model as most appropriate for the population health approach typology-Underutilized Network (Class 1), Community Need and Implementation-Focused (Class 2), and Health Disparities, Implementation, and Evaluation-Focused (Class 3). Roughly 41% of delivery systems fell into Class 1, 39% into Class 2, and 20% into Class 3. Class 1 health departments self-reported no/poor performance on the 10 population health activities. Class 2 health departments reported variable performance (0.30 < P(x) < 0.70). Class 3 health departments reported good/excellent performance for most activities (0.30 < P(x) < 0.75). Regression results showed the probability of a delivery system being in Class 1 was higher among counties with a larger number of social membership associations (P < .05). The probability of a Class 3 approach increased as the percent of non-Hispanic Black people in the community increases (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>20% of local public health delivery systems achieve the highest level of response to community-specific health priorities. Many jurisdictions do not perform well on population health activities that can reduce health disparities overall. Those with a network of support, but without established plans and processes tailored to community-specific health needs, struggle to prioritize and perform population health activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop a typology of approaches to population health activities that local health departments (LHDs) and their partners take to address community health needs, and identify associated contextual factors.
Design: Using latent class analysis, we categorized how jurisdictions prioritize and perform 10 population health activities. With a latent class regression model (multinomial logistic regression), we examined the effect of county-level community characteristics on LHD class membership. Models include primary care provider ratio, income inequality ratio, social membership association ratio, percent non-Hispanic Black, and percent non-English speakers.
Setting: Local public health delivery systems across the US.
Participants: 600 LHDs.
Main outcome measure: LHD population health approach.
Results: Information statistics revealed a 3-class model as most appropriate for the population health approach typology-Underutilized Network (Class 1), Community Need and Implementation-Focused (Class 2), and Health Disparities, Implementation, and Evaluation-Focused (Class 3). Roughly 41% of delivery systems fell into Class 1, 39% into Class 2, and 20% into Class 3. Class 1 health departments self-reported no/poor performance on the 10 population health activities. Class 2 health departments reported variable performance (0.30 < P(x) < 0.70). Class 3 health departments reported good/excellent performance for most activities (0.30 < P(x) < 0.75). Regression results showed the probability of a delivery system being in Class 1 was higher among counties with a larger number of social membership associations (P < .05). The probability of a Class 3 approach increased as the percent of non-Hispanic Black people in the community increases (P < .05).
Conclusions: 20% of local public health delivery systems achieve the highest level of response to community-specific health priorities. Many jurisdictions do not perform well on population health activities that can reduce health disparities overall. Those with a network of support, but without established plans and processes tailored to community-specific health needs, struggle to prioritize and perform population health activities.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.