A Matter of Trust: Principles to Ethically Assess AI in Health Care.

IF 1.9 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Bryan C Pilkington, Brian P A T R I C K Green, Charles E Binkley
{"title":"A Matter of Trust: Principles to Ethically Assess AI in Health Care.","authors":"Bryan C Pilkington, Brian P A T R I C K Green, Charles E Binkley","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we focus on questions of agency in emerging technologies related to decision-making in medicine. We discuss three principles that were subsumed when bioethics embraced principlism: consent, confidentiality, and veracity. We argue that the advent of artificial intelligence and its employment within health care, impacts the physician-patient relationship in a way that its inclusion in other areas does not. In particular, we take up ethical dilemmas caused by AI related to trust, and illustrate how reflection on these subsumed principles helps to critique accurately policies related to the use of AI in health care and to navigate dilemmas associated with a loss of trust. We conclude by contrasting these principles with the proposed \"five principles\" system for AI, highlighting some areas of agreement, but also showing where consent, confidentiality, and veracity are necessary additions for ethically employing AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":47377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we focus on questions of agency in emerging technologies related to decision-making in medicine. We discuss three principles that were subsumed when bioethics embraced principlism: consent, confidentiality, and veracity. We argue that the advent of artificial intelligence and its employment within health care, impacts the physician-patient relationship in a way that its inclusion in other areas does not. In particular, we take up ethical dilemmas caused by AI related to trust, and illustrate how reflection on these subsumed principles helps to critique accurately policies related to the use of AI in health care and to navigate dilemmas associated with a loss of trust. We conclude by contrasting these principles with the proposed "five principles" system for AI, highlighting some areas of agreement, but also showing where consent, confidentiality, and veracity are necessary additions for ethically employing AI.

信任问题:对医疗保健中的人工智能进行道德评估的原则。
在这篇文章中,我们关注与医学决策相关的新兴技术中的代理问题。我们讨论了当生物伦理学接受原则时所包含的三个原则:同意、保密和真实性。我们认为,人工智能的出现及其在医疗保健领域的应用,对医患关系的影响是其他领域所没有的。特别是,我们讨论了与信任相关的人工智能引起的伦理困境,并说明了对这些包含原则的反思如何有助于准确地批评与在医疗保健中使用人工智能相关的政策,以及如何应对与信任丧失相关的困境。最后,我们将这些原则与拟议的人工智能“五项原则”体系进行了对比,突出了一些共识领域,但也显示了同意、保密和真实性在道德上是人工智能使用的必要补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: This bimonthly publication explores the shared themes and concerns of philosophy and the medical sciences. Central issues in medical research and practice have important philosophical dimensions, for, in treating disease and promoting health, medicine involves presuppositions about human goals and values. Conversely, the concerns of philosophy often significantly relate to those of medicine, as philosophers seek to understand the nature of medical knowledge and the human condition in the modern world. In addition, recent developments in medical technology and treatment create moral problems that raise important philosophical questions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy aims to provide an ongoing forum for the discussion of such themes and issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信