Adaptation Process of a Culturally Tailored Smoking Cessation Intervention for People living with Severe Mental Illness in South Asia: IMPACT 4S.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Aslam Faiza, Zavala Gerardo, Mazumdar Papiya Guha, Sadananda Reddy, Thomson Heather, Prasad Muliyala Krishna, Hannah Maria Jennings, Kellar Ian, Nizami Asad Tamizuddin, Siddiqi Najma, Siddiqi Kamran, Murthy Pratima, Gilbody Simon, Mdege Noreen, Jackson Cath
{"title":"Adaptation Process of a Culturally Tailored Smoking Cessation Intervention for People living with Severe Mental Illness in South Asia: IMPACT 4S.","authors":"Aslam Faiza, Zavala Gerardo, Mazumdar Papiya Guha, Sadananda Reddy, Thomson Heather, Prasad Muliyala Krishna, Hannah Maria Jennings, Kellar Ian, Nizami Asad Tamizuddin, Siddiqi Najma, Siddiqi Kamran, Murthy Pratima, Gilbody Simon, Mdege Noreen, Jackson Cath","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite high smoking prevalence in people living with Severe Mental Illness (SMI) from low- and middle-income countries, smoking cessation interventions adapted for this population and context are lacking. This paper describes the adaptation process of a smoking cessation intervention for people living with SMI in South Asia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The adaptation process followed the first nine steps of the Escoffery framework for adapting health interventions, complemented by the Stirman adaptation classification to document the modifications. This was conducted by an interdisciplinary co-design team comprising people living with SMI, caregivers, experts in mental health, smoking cessation, and behavioral science from India, Pakistan and the UK. Stakeholders were consulted throughout. Evidence-based interventions were selected and contextual modifications to content and delivery identified. Staff were trained both in-person and online. Acceptability of the intervention was assessed through final consultations with community advisory panels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A UK intervention, SCIMITAR+, was selected to be adapted, drawing also on the TB & Tobacco and Smart Guide interventions from South Asia. Content and delivery adaptations focused on adding an additional \"life after quitting\" step, ensuring materials were understandable with culturally relevant examples and pictures, avoiding stigmatizing SMI, incorporating caregiver support, flexible scheduling of sessions alongside routine appointments, offering hybrid delivery and including female cessation advisors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We systematically adapted a UK smoking cessation intervention for people living with SMI, tailoring it for implementation in India and Pakistan. The next steps (10 and 11 of the Escoffery framework) would be to implement and evaluate it in a pilot feasibility trial.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>In this paper, we describe the adaptation process for a smoking cessation intervention in South Asia for people living with SMI. The co-design approach, involving people living with SMI, their caregivers, healthcare providers and experts in mental health, smoking cessation, and behavioral science, enhanced the intervention's relevance for the new target population.There is still a significant gap in the literature explaining how such interventions are developed. This lack of detailed reporting hinders the ability to assess the appropriateness of adaptations and limits guidance for other initiatives. By addressing this gap, this paper aims to improve transparency and show how two adaptation frameworks (Escoffery adaptation framework, Stirman classification of adaptations) were used in low-resource settings, which can inform future adaptation and implementation efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf191","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite high smoking prevalence in people living with Severe Mental Illness (SMI) from low- and middle-income countries, smoking cessation interventions adapted for this population and context are lacking. This paper describes the adaptation process of a smoking cessation intervention for people living with SMI in South Asia.

Methods: The adaptation process followed the first nine steps of the Escoffery framework for adapting health interventions, complemented by the Stirman adaptation classification to document the modifications. This was conducted by an interdisciplinary co-design team comprising people living with SMI, caregivers, experts in mental health, smoking cessation, and behavioral science from India, Pakistan and the UK. Stakeholders were consulted throughout. Evidence-based interventions were selected and contextual modifications to content and delivery identified. Staff were trained both in-person and online. Acceptability of the intervention was assessed through final consultations with community advisory panels.

Results: A UK intervention, SCIMITAR+, was selected to be adapted, drawing also on the TB & Tobacco and Smart Guide interventions from South Asia. Content and delivery adaptations focused on adding an additional "life after quitting" step, ensuring materials were understandable with culturally relevant examples and pictures, avoiding stigmatizing SMI, incorporating caregiver support, flexible scheduling of sessions alongside routine appointments, offering hybrid delivery and including female cessation advisors.

Conclusion: We systematically adapted a UK smoking cessation intervention for people living with SMI, tailoring it for implementation in India and Pakistan. The next steps (10 and 11 of the Escoffery framework) would be to implement and evaluate it in a pilot feasibility trial.

Implications: In this paper, we describe the adaptation process for a smoking cessation intervention in South Asia for people living with SMI. The co-design approach, involving people living with SMI, their caregivers, healthcare providers and experts in mental health, smoking cessation, and behavioral science, enhanced the intervention's relevance for the new target population.There is still a significant gap in the literature explaining how such interventions are developed. This lack of detailed reporting hinders the ability to assess the appropriateness of adaptations and limits guidance for other initiatives. By addressing this gap, this paper aims to improve transparency and show how two adaptation frameworks (Escoffery adaptation framework, Stirman classification of adaptations) were used in low-resource settings, which can inform future adaptation and implementation efforts.

南亚严重精神疾病患者适应文化的戒烟干预过程:IMPACT 4S
导言:尽管中低收入国家严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的吸烟率很高,但缺乏适合这一人群和背景的戒烟干预措施。本文描述了南亚重度精神分裂症患者戒烟干预的适应过程。方法:适应过程遵循Escoffery框架的前九个步骤,以适应健康干预措施,并辅以Stirman适应分类来记录修改。这是由一个跨学科的共同设计团队进行的,该团队由来自印度、巴基斯坦和英国的重度精神障碍患者、护理人员、心理健康、戒烟和行为科学专家组成。在整个过程中都咨询了利益相关者。选择了基于证据的干预措施,并确定了对内容和交付的上下文修改。员工接受了面对面和在线培训。通过与社区咨询小组的最后磋商,评估了干预措施的可接受性。结果:选择了英国的一项干预措施“弯刀+”进行调整,同时借鉴了南亚的结核病与烟草和智能指南干预措施。内容和交付调整的重点是增加额外的“戒烟后的生活”步骤,确保材料与文化相关的例子和图片可以理解,避免对重度精神障碍患者进行污名化,在常规预约之外纳入护理人员支持,灵活安排会议时间,提供混合交付,并包括女性戒烟顾问。结论:我们系统地改编了英国的一项针对重度精神障碍患者的戒烟干预措施,使其适合印度和巴基斯坦的实施。接下来的步骤(Escoffery框架的第10和第11项)将是在试点可行性试验中实施和评估该框架。在本文中,我们描述了南亚重度精神分裂症患者戒烟干预的适应过程。共同设计方法涉及重度精神分裂症患者、他们的护理人员、医疗保健提供者以及心理健康、戒烟和行为科学方面的专家,增强了干预措施与新目标人群的相关性。在解释这些干预措施是如何发展的文献中仍然存在重大差距。缺乏详细的报告妨碍了评估适应的适当性的能力,并限制了对其他倡议的指导。通过解决这一差距,本文旨在提高透明度,并展示两种适应框架(Escoffery适应框架和Stirman适应分类)是如何在低资源环境中使用的,这可以为未来的适应和实施工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信