Discrimination Distress and Current Combustible and Non-combustible Tobacco Product Use Among US Youth, 2023.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Meman Diaby, Osayande Agbonlahor, Maggie K Richardson, Joy L Hart, Shyanika W Rose, Delvon T Mattingly
{"title":"Discrimination Distress and Current Combustible and Non-combustible Tobacco Product Use Among US Youth, 2023.","authors":"Meman Diaby, Osayande Agbonlahor, Maggie K Richardson, Joy L Hart, Shyanika W Rose, Delvon T Mattingly","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntaf166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrimination is the unfair treatment of people based on their identity. Youth who experience discrimination may cope with associated distress by using tobacco products, with amplified health consequences depending on the type of product.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (n = 22 069) and derived an overall continuous measure from the 15-item Adolescent Discrimination Distress Index, as well as three continuous discrimination distress sub-indices: educational, institutional, and peer (range for each: 0-5). We defined current tobacco use as two outcomes: any past 30-day use of combustible (cigarettes, cigars, hookah, roll-your-own, pipe, bidis) and non-combustible (e-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, snus, heated tobacco, nicotine pouches, oral nicotine) products. To estimate associations between discrimination measures and tobacco use outcomes, we conducted multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Youth experienced more educational (mean = 0.56) than peer (mean = 0.48) and institutional (mean = 0.38) discrimination distress, and the prevalence of current combustible and non-combustible tobacco use was 3.89% and 9.67%. A single unit increase in overall discrimination distress was associated with increased odds of combustible (AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.47) and non-combustible (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.39) tobacco use. For subindices, only a single unit increase in institutional discrimination distress was associated with current combustible tobacco use (AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall discrimination distress was associated with current use of combustible and non-combustible tobacco products; however, only institutional discrimination distress was associated with combustible product use. These findings highlight the importance of considering discriminatory contexts as they relate to potential youth tobacco use as a distress-coping mechanism.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This study adds to the growing evidence that discrimination distress, particularly in institutional contexts, is associated with youth combustible tobacco use. By highlighting the unique role of institutional discrimination in tobacco use, our findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address discriminatory environments in these settings. These results underscore the importance of integrating anti-discrimination policies and support systems into tobacco prevention efforts to reduce maladaptive behaviors among youth. This research also suggests examining how differing discrimination contexts may shape nicotine use behavior, potentially revealing insights helpful in tailoring prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntaf166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Discrimination is the unfair treatment of people based on their identity. Youth who experience discrimination may cope with associated distress by using tobacco products, with amplified health consequences depending on the type of product.

Methods: We used data from the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (n = 22 069) and derived an overall continuous measure from the 15-item Adolescent Discrimination Distress Index, as well as three continuous discrimination distress sub-indices: educational, institutional, and peer (range for each: 0-5). We defined current tobacco use as two outcomes: any past 30-day use of combustible (cigarettes, cigars, hookah, roll-your-own, pipe, bidis) and non-combustible (e-cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, snus, heated tobacco, nicotine pouches, oral nicotine) products. To estimate associations between discrimination measures and tobacco use outcomes, we conducted multivariable logistic regression.

Results: Youth experienced more educational (mean = 0.56) than peer (mean = 0.48) and institutional (mean = 0.38) discrimination distress, and the prevalence of current combustible and non-combustible tobacco use was 3.89% and 9.67%. A single unit increase in overall discrimination distress was associated with increased odds of combustible (AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.47) and non-combustible (AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.39) tobacco use. For subindices, only a single unit increase in institutional discrimination distress was associated with current combustible tobacco use (AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.59).

Conclusion: Overall discrimination distress was associated with current use of combustible and non-combustible tobacco products; however, only institutional discrimination distress was associated with combustible product use. These findings highlight the importance of considering discriminatory contexts as they relate to potential youth tobacco use as a distress-coping mechanism.

Implications: This study adds to the growing evidence that discrimination distress, particularly in institutional contexts, is associated with youth combustible tobacco use. By highlighting the unique role of institutional discrimination in tobacco use, our findings emphasize the need for targeted interventions to address discriminatory environments in these settings. These results underscore the importance of integrating anti-discrimination policies and support systems into tobacco prevention efforts to reduce maladaptive behaviors among youth. This research also suggests examining how differing discrimination contexts may shape nicotine use behavior, potentially revealing insights helpful in tailoring prevention strategies.

歧视困扰和当前可燃和不可燃烟草产品在美国青年中的使用,2023。
引言:歧视是基于身份对人们的不公平对待。遭受歧视的青年可能通过使用烟草制品来应对相关的痛苦,根据产品的类型,其健康后果会放大。方法:我们使用了2023年全国青少年烟草调查(n = 22069)的数据,并从15项青少年歧视困扰指数以及三个连续歧视困扰子指数:教育、机构和同伴(范围为0-5)中得出了一个整体的连续度量。我们将当前的烟草使用定义为两种结果:任何过去30天内使用的可燃(香烟、雪茄、水烟、自制卷烟、烟斗、比迪烟)和非可燃(电子烟、无烟烟草、鼻烟、加热烟草、尼古丁袋、口服尼古丁)产品。为了估计歧视措施与烟草使用结果之间的关联,我们进行了多变量逻辑回归。结果:青少年的教育歧视(平均值= 0.56)高于同龄人(平均值= 0.48)和制度歧视(平均值= 0.38),目前可燃烟草和非可燃烟草的使用率分别为3.89%和9.67%。整体歧视痛苦的单个单位增加与可燃(AOR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08至1.47)和非可燃(AOR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09至1.39)烟草使用的几率增加有关。对于分项指数,只有一个单位的制度歧视困扰增加与目前的可燃烟草使用有关(AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.06至1.59)。结论:总体歧视困扰与当前使用可燃和不可燃烟草制品有关;然而,只有制度歧视困扰与可燃产品的使用有关。这些发现强调了考虑歧视性背景的重要性,因为它们与青少年潜在的烟草使用有关,是一种应对痛苦的机制。启示:这项研究进一步证明,歧视困扰,特别是在制度背景下,与青少年使用可燃烟草有关。通过强调制度歧视在烟草使用中的独特作用,我们的研究结果强调需要有针对性的干预措施来解决这些环境中的歧视性环境。这些结果强调了将反歧视政策和支持系统纳入烟草预防工作以减少青少年适应不良行为的重要性。这项研究还建议研究不同的歧视背景如何影响尼古丁使用行为,潜在地揭示有助于制定预防策略的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信