The analgesic effects of human milk odor in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ana Beatriz Bertol, Barkhá Vijendra, Pedro Henrique Aquino Gil de Freitas, Áurea Maria Salomão Simão, Bianca Lisa de Faria, Rodrigo da Rosa Iop
{"title":"The analgesic effects of human milk odor in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ana Beatriz Bertol, Barkhá Vijendra, Pedro Henrique Aquino Gil de Freitas, Áurea Maria Salomão Simão, Bianca Lisa de Faria, Rodrigo da Rosa Iop","doi":"10.1038/s41372-025-02432-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Preterm neonates frequently undergo a variety of painful and invasive procedures. Neonatal pain has been associated with changes in hormone levels, tissue damage, and brain development. Nonpharmacological approaches, such as the use of breast milk odor, have been investigated as a strategy to reduce those effects. However, its efficacy remains unclear, and further research is needed to establish its true therapeutic value.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Evaluate the analgesic effects of breast milk odor in premature neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of human milk odor compared with no aromatherapy (control) or placebo (odorless diffuser/distilled water/saline) on pain relief, oxygen saturation (SaO₂), and heart rate in preterm neonates undergoing invasive procedures. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data up to July 5, 2025. Statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan Web (version 8.0.0) for the primary meta-analyses, and R software was used to perform sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 460 references identified, eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, totaling 451 preterm neonates, of whom 225 (49.9%) were exposed to human milk odor. The mean gestational age was 33.56 ± 2.58 weeks, and 226 (50.1%) were male. Two studies were conducted using venipuncture as a painful procedure, four used the heel prick test, one used peripheral catheterization, and one used vaccination. Compared with the control group and the placebo, the group exposed to the milk odor showed a reduction in pain scores during the painful procedure (SMD = -0.95; 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.45; p = 0.0002; I² = 84%). The subgroup analysis of the five RCTs that used the PIPP score for the pain assessment showed similar results; the human milk odor-exposed group showed a lower pain score compared with the control group (MD -2.66; 95% CI -4.25 to -1.06; p = 0.001). Secondary outcomes included physiological parameters such as heart rate and oxygen saturation (SaO₂). Neonates exposed to breast milk odor exhibited lower heart rates compared to control (MD = -9.26; 95% CI: -14.28 to -4.24; p = 0.0003; I² = 27%). Oxygen saturation was also higher in the intervention group (MD = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.68-4.12; p = 0.006; I² = 53%) CONCLUSION: Aromatherapy with human breast milk reduces pain in neonates. Larger studies are needed to validate our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-025-02432-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preterm neonates frequently undergo a variety of painful and invasive procedures. Neonatal pain has been associated with changes in hormone levels, tissue damage, and brain development. Nonpharmacological approaches, such as the use of breast milk odor, have been investigated as a strategy to reduce those effects. However, its efficacy remains unclear, and further research is needed to establish its true therapeutic value.

Purpose: Evaluate the analgesic effects of breast milk odor in premature neonates.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of human milk odor compared with no aromatherapy (control) or placebo (odorless diffuser/distilled water/saline) on pain relief, oxygen saturation (SaO₂), and heart rate in preterm neonates undergoing invasive procedures. Two independent reviewers screened studies and extracted data up to July 5, 2025. Statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan Web (version 8.0.0) for the primary meta-analyses, and R software was used to perform sensitivity analyses.

Results: Among 460 references identified, eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria, totaling 451 preterm neonates, of whom 225 (49.9%) were exposed to human milk odor. The mean gestational age was 33.56 ± 2.58 weeks, and 226 (50.1%) were male. Two studies were conducted using venipuncture as a painful procedure, four used the heel prick test, one used peripheral catheterization, and one used vaccination. Compared with the control group and the placebo, the group exposed to the milk odor showed a reduction in pain scores during the painful procedure (SMD = -0.95; 95% CI: -1.45 to -0.45; p = 0.0002; I² = 84%). The subgroup analysis of the five RCTs that used the PIPP score for the pain assessment showed similar results; the human milk odor-exposed group showed a lower pain score compared with the control group (MD -2.66; 95% CI -4.25 to -1.06; p = 0.001). Secondary outcomes included physiological parameters such as heart rate and oxygen saturation (SaO₂). Neonates exposed to breast milk odor exhibited lower heart rates compared to control (MD = -9.26; 95% CI: -14.28 to -4.24; p = 0.0003; I² = 27%). Oxygen saturation was also higher in the intervention group (MD = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.68-4.12; p = 0.006; I² = 53%) CONCLUSION: Aromatherapy with human breast milk reduces pain in neonates. Larger studies are needed to validate our results.

人乳气味对早产儿的镇痛作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
早产儿经常经历各种痛苦和侵入性手术。新生儿疼痛与激素水平、组织损伤和大脑发育的变化有关。非药物方法,如使用母乳气味,已经被研究作为一种策略来减少这些影响。然而,其疗效尚不清楚,需要进一步研究以确定其真正的治疗价值。目的:评价母乳气味对早产儿的镇痛作用。方法:我们系统地检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane的随机对照试验(rct),评估母乳气味与无芳香疗法(对照)或安慰剂(无气味扩散器/蒸馏水/生理盐水)对接受有创手术的早产儿疼痛缓解、血氧饱和度(SaO 2)和心率的影响。两名独立审稿人筛选了研究并提取了截至2025年7月5日的数据。采用RevMan Web (version 8.0.0)进行统计分析,采用R软件进行敏感性分析。结果:460篇文献中,8篇随机对照试验符合纳入标准,共451例早产儿,其中225例(49.9%)暴露于人乳气味。平均胎龄33.56±2.58周,男性226例(50.1%)。两项研究采用静脉穿刺作为疼痛的治疗方法,四项研究采用足跟穿刺试验,一项研究采用外周穿刺,一项研究采用疫苗接种。与对照组和安慰剂组相比,暴露在牛奶气味中的组在疼痛过程中疼痛评分降低(SMD = -0.95; 95% CI: -1.45至-0.45;p = 0.0002; I²= 84%)。使用PIPP评分进行疼痛评估的5个随机对照试验的亚组分析结果相似;与对照组相比,母乳气味暴露组的疼痛评分较低(MD -2.66; 95% CI -4.25 ~ -1.06; p = 0.001)。次要结果包括心率和血氧饱和度(SaO 2)等生理参数。与对照组相比,暴露于母乳气味中的新生儿表现出较低的心率(MD = -9.26; 95% CI: -14.28至-4.24;p = 0.0003; I²= 27%)。干预组的血氧饱和度也较高(MD = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.68 ~ 4.12; p = 0.006; I²= 53%)。结论:人母乳芳香疗法可减轻新生儿疼痛。需要更大规模的研究来验证我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatology
Journal of Perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatology provides members of the perinatal/neonatal healthcare team with original information pertinent to improving maternal/fetal and neonatal care. We publish peer-reviewed clinical research articles, state-of-the art reviews, comments, quality improvement reports, and letters to the editor. Articles published in the Journal of Perinatology embrace the full scope of the specialty, including clinical, professional, political, administrative and educational aspects. The Journal also explores legal and ethical issues, neonatal technology and product development. The Journal’s audience includes all those that participate in perinatal/neonatal care, including, but not limited to neonatologists, perinatologists, perinatal epidemiologists, pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists, surgeons, neonatal and perinatal nurses, respiratory therapists, pharmacists, social workers, dieticians, speech and hearing experts, other allied health professionals, as well as subspecialists who participate in patient care including radiologists, laboratory medicine and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信