Autologous Skin Cell Suspension in Burn Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kian Daneshi, José Antonio Arellano, Sarah Tepe, Hilary Y Liu, Haig A Yenikomshian, Justin Gillenwater, C Scott Hultman, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro
{"title":"Autologous Skin Cell Suspension in Burn Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.","authors":"Kian Daneshi, José Antonio Arellano, Sarah Tepe, Hilary Y Liu, Haig A Yenikomshian, Justin Gillenwater, C Scott Hultman, Jenny A Ziembicki, Francesco M Egro","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ReCell, an autologous cell harvesting technology also known as Autologous Skin Cell Suspension (ASCS), has shown promise in enhancing skin regeneration for burn patients. Despite its growing use in clinical practice, the current literature displays considerable variability in study design and quality, leading to ongoing uncertainty about its true clinical effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of ASCS in the treatment of burns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, utilizing searches across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The review protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024606554). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the ROBINS-I tool were applied to assess bias in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. The overall methodological quality of included studies was appraised using the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies (n = 3362) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The pooled mean patient age was 37.6 years, with a male predominance (65.9%). The average %TBSA affected was 14.6% (95% CI: 8.8-20.4), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 95.1%). Meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in complication rates with ASCS combined with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) compared to STSG alone (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.00, p = 0.048). However, rates of wound infection and graft failure did not differ significantly between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ASCS demonstrates potential in reducing complications in burn care. Nevertheless, due to heterogeneous study designs, further high-quality, large-scale randomized trials are warranted to validate its long-term efficacy and broader clinical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ReCell, an autologous cell harvesting technology also known as Autologous Skin Cell Suspension (ASCS), has shown promise in enhancing skin regeneration for burn patients. Despite its growing use in clinical practice, the current literature displays considerable variability in study design and quality, leading to ongoing uncertainty about its true clinical effectiveness. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively evaluate the clinical efficacy of ASCS in the treatment of burns.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, utilizing searches across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The review protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024606554). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the ROBINS-I tool were applied to assess bias in randomized controlled trials and observational studies, respectively. The overall methodological quality of included studies was appraised using the GRADE framework.

Results: Fourteen studies (n = 3362) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The pooled mean patient age was 37.6 years, with a male predominance (65.9%). The average %TBSA affected was 14.6% (95% CI: 8.8-20.4), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 95.1%). Meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in complication rates with ASCS combined with split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) compared to STSG alone (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.00, p = 0.048). However, rates of wound infection and graft failure did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: ASCS demonstrates potential in reducing complications in burn care. Nevertheless, due to heterogeneous study designs, further high-quality, large-scale randomized trials are warranted to validate its long-term efficacy and broader clinical utility.

自体皮肤细胞悬浮液在烧伤治疗中的应用:临床结果的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:ReCell是一种自体细胞收集技术,也被称为自体皮肤细胞悬浮(ASCS),在促进烧伤患者的皮肤再生方面显示出前景。尽管它在临床实践中的应用越来越多,但目前的文献显示,在研究设计和质量上存在相当大的差异,导致其真正的临床效果仍不确定。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在全面评价ASCS治疗烧伤的临床疗效。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价,利用PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane数据库进行检索。该审查方案在PROSPERO上前瞻性注册(CRD42024606554)。分别应用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和ROBINS-I工具评估随机对照试验和观察性研究的偏倚。采用GRADE框架评价纳入研究的总体方法学质量。结果:14项研究(n = 3362)符合纳入标准。患者平均年龄37.6岁,男性占65.9%。TBSA受影响的平均百分比为14.6% (95% CI: 8.8-20.4),存在很大的异质性(I2 = 95.1%)。meta分析显示,与单纯植皮术相比,ASCS联合裂厚植皮术(STSG)的并发症发生率显著降低(RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.00, p = 0.048)。然而,两组之间的伤口感染率和移植物失败率没有显著差异。结论:ASCS在减少烧伤护理并发症方面具有潜力。然而,由于异质性研究设计,需要进一步的高质量、大规模随机试验来验证其长期疗效和更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信