Eye injury rates and community cost savings through vision centers: Evidence from southern India.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Vinoth Kumar Rajendran, Amanulla Mohammed Gowth, Ashwin Balasubramanian, Akkayasamy Kowsalya, Iswarya Mani, Sanil Joseph, Thulasiraj D Ravilla
{"title":"Eye injury rates and community cost savings through vision centers: Evidence from southern India.","authors":"Vinoth Kumar Rajendran, Amanulla Mohammed Gowth, Ashwin Balasubramanian, Akkayasamy Kowsalya, Iswarya Mani, Sanil Joseph, Thulasiraj D Ravilla","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_631_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Eye injuries are a significant public health concern, yet data on their burden in South Indian communities remains scarce. This study assessed the annual rates of eye injuries, evaluated the effectiveness of vision centers (VCs) in their management, and analyzed the cost-benefit impact of these facilities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of VC medical records, including all eye injury cases reported at 35 VCs affiliated with a tertiary eye hospital, Madurai, between 2021 and 2022. A cost analysis accounted for patient expenses, including registration and travel from VCs to the base hospital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 219,172 outpatients, 6.98% presented with eye injuries, with males comprising 63.9% and females 36.1% of cases. The mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 39 (19.1) years. Individuals under 20 years accounted for 17.5% of cases, while 66.5% occurred in working-age adults (20-59 years; P < 0.001). Globe injuries comprised 85.3% of cases, with the remaining 14.7% being periocular injuries. Most injuries (85.8%) were managed at VCs, while the rest (14.2%) required referral to base hospitals. The VCs generated community savings of ₹5.6 million (US$ 67,233) in travel and registration costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Eye injuries impose a substantial burden, particularly among working-age adults and individuals under 20 years. VCs effectively manage the majority of cases locally, providing accessible care and significant cost savings for South Indian communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_631_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Eye injuries are a significant public health concern, yet data on their burden in South Indian communities remains scarce. This study assessed the annual rates of eye injuries, evaluated the effectiveness of vision centers (VCs) in their management, and analyzed the cost-benefit impact of these facilities.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of VC medical records, including all eye injury cases reported at 35 VCs affiliated with a tertiary eye hospital, Madurai, between 2021 and 2022. A cost analysis accounted for patient expenses, including registration and travel from VCs to the base hospital.

Results: Of the 219,172 outpatients, 6.98% presented with eye injuries, with males comprising 63.9% and females 36.1% of cases. The mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 39 (19.1) years. Individuals under 20 years accounted for 17.5% of cases, while 66.5% occurred in working-age adults (20-59 years; P < 0.001). Globe injuries comprised 85.3% of cases, with the remaining 14.7% being periocular injuries. Most injuries (85.8%) were managed at VCs, while the rest (14.2%) required referral to base hospitals. The VCs generated community savings of ₹5.6 million (US$ 67,233) in travel and registration costs.

Conclusion: Eye injuries impose a substantial burden, particularly among working-age adults and individuals under 20 years. VCs effectively manage the majority of cases locally, providing accessible care and significant cost savings for South Indian communities.

通过视力中心降低眼伤率和社区成本:来自印度南部的证据。
目的:眼伤是一个重要的公共卫生问题,但关于南印度社区眼伤负担的数据仍然很少。本研究评估了眼损伤的年发生率,评估了视力中心(VCs)在其管理方面的有效性,并分析了这些设施的成本效益影响。方法:我们对VC的医疗记录进行了回顾性分析,包括马杜赖一家三级眼科医院附属的35家VC在2021年至2022年间报告的所有眼部损伤病例。成本分析考虑了患者费用,包括注册和从风险投资中心到基地医院的旅费。结果:门诊219172例患者中,眼部损伤发生率为6.98%,其中男性占63.9%,女性占36.1%。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为39(19.1)岁。20岁以下的个体占17.5%,而66.5%发生在工作年龄的成年人(20-59岁;P < 0.001)。眼球损伤占85.3%,其余14.7%为眼周损伤。大多数伤情(85.8%)在基地医院处理,其余伤情(14.2%)需要转诊到基地医院。创投公司为社区节省了560万卢比(67,233美元)的旅行和注册费用。结论:眼部损伤造成了巨大的负担,特别是在工作年龄的成年人和20岁以下的个人中。创投机构在当地有效地管理了大多数病例,为南印度社区提供了可获得的护理,并节省了大量费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信