Factors determining compliance with recommended intravitreal injections for retinal diseases among out-of-pocket, fully subsidized (non-paying), and insured patients: Real-world evidence from India.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Anthony V Das, Brijesh Kashyap, Brijesh Takkar, Ragukumar Venugopal, Chirantan Chatterjee, Mehul C Mehta, Michael W Stewart, Gudlavalleti V S Murthy, Rohit C Khanna, Taraprasad Das, Raja Narayanan
{"title":"Factors determining compliance with recommended intravitreal injections for retinal diseases among out-of-pocket, fully subsidized (non-paying), and insured patients: Real-world evidence from India.","authors":"Anthony V Das, Brijesh Kashyap, Brijesh Takkar, Ragukumar Venugopal, Chirantan Chatterjee, Mehul C Mehta, Michael W Stewart, Gudlavalleti V S Murthy, Rohit C Khanna, Taraprasad Das, Raja Narayanan","doi":"10.4103/IJO.IJO_671_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the factors associated with compliance with recommended intravitreal injections (IVIs) for retinal diseases among out-of-pocket, insured, and fully subsidized (non-paying) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational hospital-based study included patients recommended for IVI in at least one eye between November 2011 and May 2022. Three cohorts of patients were assessed: out-of-pocket payers, insured, and those fully subsidized (non-paying) by the hospital. The main outcome measure was the compliance rate, defined as the proportion of patients receiving an injection after one was recommended. The impact on the visual outcome in each cohort was a secondary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 50,408 IVI were recommended for at least one eye and were included in the analyses. Male patients were more common (66.72%), and the mean age was 55.36 ± 16.39 years. The overall compliance rate with the first recommended injection was 51.37%, which increased and eventually stabilized with subsequent recommendations to approximately 80% (range: 77.48%-82.93%). Insured patients had a higher compliance rate with the first recommendation compared to the non-insured (100% vs. 49.84%; P < 0.00001), and non-paying patients had a higher compliance rate after the first recommendation compared to paying patients (62.51% vs. 48.66%; P < 0.00001). Patients with insurance achieved a better visual outcome at the last follow-up compared to other cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Insured patients have a much higher compliance rate with recommended IVIs compared to out-of-pocket or non-paying patients. The high non-compliance rate among non-paying patients suggests that factors other than the direct cost of the injections may impact compliance with recommended treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13329,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_671_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the factors associated with compliance with recommended intravitreal injections (IVIs) for retinal diseases among out-of-pocket, insured, and fully subsidized (non-paying) patients.

Methods: This retrospective observational hospital-based study included patients recommended for IVI in at least one eye between November 2011 and May 2022. Three cohorts of patients were assessed: out-of-pocket payers, insured, and those fully subsidized (non-paying) by the hospital. The main outcome measure was the compliance rate, defined as the proportion of patients receiving an injection after one was recommended. The impact on the visual outcome in each cohort was a secondary outcome.

Results: Overall, 50,408 IVI were recommended for at least one eye and were included in the analyses. Male patients were more common (66.72%), and the mean age was 55.36 ± 16.39 years. The overall compliance rate with the first recommended injection was 51.37%, which increased and eventually stabilized with subsequent recommendations to approximately 80% (range: 77.48%-82.93%). Insured patients had a higher compliance rate with the first recommendation compared to the non-insured (100% vs. 49.84%; P < 0.00001), and non-paying patients had a higher compliance rate after the first recommendation compared to paying patients (62.51% vs. 48.66%; P < 0.00001). Patients with insurance achieved a better visual outcome at the last follow-up compared to other cohorts.

Conclusion: Insured patients have a much higher compliance rate with recommended IVIs compared to out-of-pocket or non-paying patients. The high non-compliance rate among non-paying patients suggests that factors other than the direct cost of the injections may impact compliance with recommended treatment.

决定自费、全额补贴(非自费)和参保患者接受推荐的视网膜疾病玻璃体内注射的因素:来自印度的真实证据。
目的:确定自费、参保和全额补贴(非自费)患者对推荐的玻璃体内注射(IVIs)治疗视网膜疾病依从性的相关因素。方法:这项以医院为基础的回顾性观察性研究纳入了2011年11月至2022年5月期间推荐进行至少一只眼睛IVI的患者。评估了三组患者:自费者、参保者和医院全额补贴(不支付)的患者。主要结局指标是依从率,定义为推荐注射后接受注射的患者比例。在每个队列中,对视觉结果的影响是次要结果。结果:总体而言,至少有一只眼睛推荐了50,408例IVI,并纳入了分析。男性多见(66.72%),平均年龄55.36±16.39岁。首次推荐注射的总体依从率为51.37%,随后逐渐增加并最终稳定在80%左右(范围:77.48% ~ 82.93%)。参保患者第一次推荐的依从率高于未参保患者(100%比49.84%,P < 0.00001),未参保患者第一次推荐后的依从率高于未参保患者(62.51%比48.66%,P < 0.00001)。与其他队列相比,有保险的患者在最后一次随访中获得了更好的视力结果。结论:参保患者对推荐静脉注射的依从率明显高于自费或非自费患者。非付费患者的高不遵医嘱率表明,除注射的直接费用外,其他因素可能影响对推荐治疗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.40%
发文量
1963
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Ophthalmology covers clinical, experimental, basic science research and translational research studies related to medical, ethical and social issues in field of ophthalmology and vision science. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信