Effect of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HB EN01) and Steinernema rarum (PAM 25) nematodes on the control of cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae)
{"title":"Effect of Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HB EN01) and Steinernema rarum (PAM 25) nematodes on the control of cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae)","authors":"E.R. Souza, J.G.C. Orozco, F.C. Duarte, L.C. Torres, M.C. Mendes","doi":"10.1016/j.vetpar.2025.110604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The excessive use of acaricides in the management of the tick <em>Rhipicephalus</em> (<em>Boophilus</em>) <em>microplus</em> has favored the development of resistance in the parasites, in addition to causing environmental contamination. In this context, biological control using entomopathogenic nematodes appears as a promising alternative. This study evaluated the efficacy of two isolates, <em>Heterorhabditis bacteriophora</em> (HB EN01) and <em>Steinernema rarum</em> (PAM 25), in the in vitro control of <em>R</em>. (<em>B</em>.) <em>microplus</em>. Two experiments were conducted with different concentrations of nematodes. In the first, fifteen engorged females were exposed to suspensions containing 100, 200 and 300 infective juveniles (IJs) per female. The second experiment was carried out in soil substrate, with a concentration of 200 IJs per female. Three application systems were tested: S1 (females placed on the substrate before application), S2 (suspension applied before the introduction of females) and S3 (females placed in a voile bag on the substrate). For <em>S</em>. <em>rarum</em> (PAM 25), there was no significant difference in oviposition inhibition, but larval hatching was lower at concentrations of 200 and 300 IJs/female compared to 100 (p < 0.05). <em>H</em>. <em>bacteriophora</em> (HB EN01) showed a significant reduction in oviposition only between concentrations of 100 and 300 IJs/female (p < 0.05), with no variation in larval hatching or efficacy. On the soil substrate, both isolates showed efficacy above 80 %, except for <em>S. rarum</em> in the voile system (60 %). Treated females showed darkening and dehydration from the 4th day onwards. The control group remained healthy. The results indicate that EPNs are an effective alternative in the control of <em>R</em>. (<em>B.) microplus</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23716,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary parasitology","volume":"340 ","pages":"Article 110604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304401725002158","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The excessive use of acaricides in the management of the tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus has favored the development of resistance in the parasites, in addition to causing environmental contamination. In this context, biological control using entomopathogenic nematodes appears as a promising alternative. This study evaluated the efficacy of two isolates, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (HB EN01) and Steinernema rarum (PAM 25), in the in vitro control of R. (B.) microplus. Two experiments were conducted with different concentrations of nematodes. In the first, fifteen engorged females were exposed to suspensions containing 100, 200 and 300 infective juveniles (IJs) per female. The second experiment was carried out in soil substrate, with a concentration of 200 IJs per female. Three application systems were tested: S1 (females placed on the substrate before application), S2 (suspension applied before the introduction of females) and S3 (females placed in a voile bag on the substrate). For S. rarum (PAM 25), there was no significant difference in oviposition inhibition, but larval hatching was lower at concentrations of 200 and 300 IJs/female compared to 100 (p < 0.05). H. bacteriophora (HB EN01) showed a significant reduction in oviposition only between concentrations of 100 and 300 IJs/female (p < 0.05), with no variation in larval hatching or efficacy. On the soil substrate, both isolates showed efficacy above 80 %, except for S. rarum in the voile system (60 %). Treated females showed darkening and dehydration from the 4th day onwards. The control group remained healthy. The results indicate that EPNs are an effective alternative in the control of R. (B.) microplus.
期刊介绍:
The journal Veterinary Parasitology has an open access mirror journal,Veterinary Parasitology: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
This journal is concerned with those aspects of helminthology, protozoology and entomology which are of interest to animal health investigators, veterinary practitioners and others with a special interest in parasitology. Papers of the highest quality dealing with all aspects of disease prevention, pathology, treatment, epidemiology, and control of parasites in all domesticated animals, fall within the scope of the journal. Papers of geographically limited (local) interest which are not of interest to an international audience will not be accepted. Authors who submit papers based on local data will need to indicate why their paper is relevant to a broader readership.
Parasitological studies on laboratory animals fall within the scope of the journal only if they provide a reasonably close model of a disease of domestic animals. Additionally the journal will consider papers relating to wildlife species where they may act as disease reservoirs to domestic animals, or as a zoonotic reservoir. Case studies considered to be unique or of specific interest to the journal, will also be considered on occasions at the Editors'' discretion. Papers dealing exclusively with the taxonomy of parasites do not fall within the scope of the journal.