Analyzing the relationship between municipal solid waste generation and urban land use using integrated geospatial and spatial statistical techniques.

IF 8.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Porush Kumar, Mahendra Pratap Choudhary, Anil K Mathur
{"title":"Analyzing the relationship between municipal solid waste generation and urban land use using integrated geospatial and spatial statistical techniques.","authors":"Porush Kumar, Mahendra Pratap Choudhary, Anil K Mathur","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjaf128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the spatial variability of municipal solid waste (MSW) generation is critical for informed urban planning and sustainable waste management. This study examines the relationship between land use patterns and MSW generation across the urban ecosystem of Kota City, India, to identify spatial clusters and assess the influence of urban form and density. An integrated geospatial-statistical approach was applied to 146 urban wards using Hotspot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*), Global and Local Moran's I, overlay analysis, and zonal statistics. Waste generation data were spatially linked with land use typologies and population density to detect statistically significant patterns. Daily waste generation ranged from 0.43 to 11.13 metric tons (t/day) across wards. High-intensity hotspots were found in densely populated and mixed-use zones, such as Ward 15 (0.61 kg/person/day) and Ward 5 (0.88 kg/person/day). Spatial autocorrelation analysis confirmed significant clustering (Global Moran's I = 0.056, z = 2.59, p = 0.009), with prominent hotspots identified in Wards 12, 13 (Kota-North) and Wards 16, 17 (Kota-South) at 99% confidence. Residential zones contributed the highest MSW load (541.97 t/day), followed by industrial (55.69 t/day) and commercial areas (50.20 t/day). Urban land use, population density, and mixed-use zoning significantly influence waste generation patterns. The spatial-statistical framework developed herein provides a scalable decision-support tool for waste planning, zoning policy, and sustainable resource management in rapidly urbanizing cities.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjaf128","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding the spatial variability of municipal solid waste (MSW) generation is critical for informed urban planning and sustainable waste management. This study examines the relationship between land use patterns and MSW generation across the urban ecosystem of Kota City, India, to identify spatial clusters and assess the influence of urban form and density. An integrated geospatial-statistical approach was applied to 146 urban wards using Hotspot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*), Global and Local Moran's I, overlay analysis, and zonal statistics. Waste generation data were spatially linked with land use typologies and population density to detect statistically significant patterns. Daily waste generation ranged from 0.43 to 11.13 metric tons (t/day) across wards. High-intensity hotspots were found in densely populated and mixed-use zones, such as Ward 15 (0.61 kg/person/day) and Ward 5 (0.88 kg/person/day). Spatial autocorrelation analysis confirmed significant clustering (Global Moran's I = 0.056, z = 2.59, p = 0.009), with prominent hotspots identified in Wards 12, 13 (Kota-North) and Wards 16, 17 (Kota-South) at 99% confidence. Residential zones contributed the highest MSW load (541.97 t/day), followed by industrial (55.69 t/day) and commercial areas (50.20 t/day). Urban land use, population density, and mixed-use zoning significantly influence waste generation patterns. The spatial-statistical framework developed herein provides a scalable decision-support tool for waste planning, zoning policy, and sustainable resource management in rapidly urbanizing cities.

基于地理空间与空间综合统计技术的城市生活垃圾产生与土地利用关系分析
了解城市固体废物(MSW)产生的空间变异性对于明智的城市规划和可持续的废物管理至关重要。本研究考察了印度哥打市城市生态系统中土地利用模式与城市生活垃圾产生之间的关系,以确定空间集群并评估城市形态和密度的影响。采用热点分析(Getis-Ord Gi*)、全球和局部Moran’s I、覆盖分析和区域统计等方法,对146个城市病区进行了地理空间统计综合分析。废物产生数据与土地利用类型和人口密度在空间上联系起来,以发现统计上显著的模式。各区每天产生的废物量为0.43至11.13公吨(吨/天)。在人口密集和混合功能区发现了高强度热点,如15区(0.61 kg/人/天)和5区(0.88 kg/人/天)。空间自相关分析证实了显著的聚类(Global Moran’s I = 0.056, z = 2.59, p = 0.009),在12、13区(Kota-North)和16、17区(Kota-South)发现了突出的热点,置信区间为99%。居住区贡献的城市生活垃圾负荷最高(541.97 t/d),其次是工业区(55.69 t/d)和商业区(50.20 t/d)。城市土地利用、人口密度和混合用途分区显著影响废物产生模式。本文开发的空间统计框架为快速城市化城市的废物规划、分区政策和可持续资源管理提供了可扩展的决策支持工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCESTOXICOLOGY&nbs-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas: Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making Health and ecological risk and impact assessment Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems Sustaining ecosystems Managing large-scale environmental change Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society: Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信