Quantifying Experimental Impacts on Non-Newtonian Foam Characterization for Flow Modeling in Porous Media: Insights From Foam-Quality and Flow Rate Scan Experiments

IF 5 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Anderson de Moura Ribeiro, Leandro Freitas Lopes, Bernardo Martins Rocha, Rodrigo Weber dos Santos, Juliana Maria da Fonseca Façanha, Aurora Pérez-Gramatges, Grigori Chapiro
{"title":"Quantifying Experimental Impacts on Non-Newtonian Foam Characterization for Flow Modeling in Porous Media: Insights From Foam-Quality and Flow Rate Scan Experiments","authors":"Anderson de Moura Ribeiro, Leandro Freitas Lopes, Bernardo Martins Rocha, Rodrigo Weber dos Santos, Juliana Maria da Fonseca Façanha, Aurora Pérez-Gramatges, Grigori Chapiro","doi":"10.1029/2024wr039536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foam injection is a prominent technique for mitigating the effects of high gas mobility in porous media for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage and well-stimulation. Experiments reveal that the foam's apparent viscosity exhibits shear-thinning behavior, meaning its viscosity decreases with superficial velocity. Foam parameters are commonly characterized using only single-velocity foam-quality scan data. However, this approach can introduce significant uncertainty when evaluating foam's apparent viscosity at different velocities. This study conducts foam-quality and flow rate scan experiments. Characterization of foam, using both single- and multi-velocity data, is performed using computational models and the solution of the associated inverse problems. Identifiability analysis and inverse and forward uncertainty quantification are performed to evaluate errors associated with the different data sets. The results demonstrate that relying only on foam-quality scan data leads to underestimation or overestimation of foam's apparent viscosity, with errors of up to 62.5%. The impact of these misfitting issues is assessed in a heterogeneous scenario, where differences in production levels, breakthrough time, and pressure drops are analyzed with errors of 2.5%, 14.8%, and 45%, respectively. Therefore, this study underscores the importance of aligning laboratory experiments with parameter estimation methodologies that accurately characterize the non-Newtonian behavior of foams.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr039536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foam injection is a prominent technique for mitigating the effects of high gas mobility in porous media for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage and well-stimulation. Experiments reveal that the foam's apparent viscosity exhibits shear-thinning behavior, meaning its viscosity decreases with superficial velocity. Foam parameters are commonly characterized using only single-velocity foam-quality scan data. However, this approach can introduce significant uncertainty when evaluating foam's apparent viscosity at different velocities. This study conducts foam-quality and flow rate scan experiments. Characterization of foam, using both single- and multi-velocity data, is performed using computational models and the solution of the associated inverse problems. Identifiability analysis and inverse and forward uncertainty quantification are performed to evaluate errors associated with the different data sets. The results demonstrate that relying only on foam-quality scan data leads to underestimation or overestimation of foam's apparent viscosity, with errors of up to 62.5%. The impact of these misfitting issues is assessed in a heterogeneous scenario, where differences in production levels, breakthrough time, and pressure drops are analyzed with errors of 2.5%, 14.8%, and 45%, respectively. Therefore, this study underscores the importance of aligning laboratory experiments with parameter estimation methodologies that accurately characterize the non-Newtonian behavior of foams.
定量实验对多孔介质流动建模中非牛顿泡沫表征的影响:来自泡沫质量和流量扫描实验的见解
泡沫注入是缓解多孔介质中高气体流动性影响的一项重要技术,可用于提高采收率、碳捕获、利用和储存以及油井增产。实验结果表明,泡沫的表观黏度表现为剪切减薄,黏度随表面速度的增加而减小。泡沫参数通常仅使用单速泡沫质量扫描数据来表征。然而,这种方法在评估泡沫在不同速度下的表观粘度时,会带来很大的不确定性。本研究进行了泡沫质量和流量扫描实验。利用单速和多速数据对泡沫进行表征,并使用计算模型和相关逆问题的解决方案。可识别性分析和反向和正向不确定性量化进行评估与不同数据集相关的误差。结果表明,仅依靠泡沫质量扫描数据会导致泡沫表观粘度的低估或高估,误差高达62.5%。这些错配问题的影响是在异质情况下进行评估的,其中对生产水平、突破时间和压降的差异进行分析,误差分别为2.5%、14.8%和45%。因此,这项研究强调了将实验室实验与参数估计方法相结合的重要性,这些方法可以准确地表征泡沫的非牛顿行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信