{"title":"Protective Effects of Safranal Against Paraquat-Induced Acute Lung Injury in Rat.","authors":"Sima Beigoli,Arghavan Memarzia,Mahla Mohammadi Mahjoob,Nema Mohammadian Roshan,Mohammad Hossein Boskabady","doi":"10.1002/tox.24561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lung and multi-organ injuries are caused by the herbicide paraquat (PQ). Safranal (Saf), the principal compound found in Crocus sativus, exhibits a diverse array of pharmacological properties, encompassing anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and immunoregulatory activities. The potential preventive impacts of Saf and pioglitazone (Pio), in comparison to dexamethasone (Dexa), were investigated in rats to assess their efficacy in mitigating lung injury induced by PQ aerosol. Saline aerosol was given to the control (Ctrl) group of rats, whereas PQ aerosol was given to the other six groups (PQ), eight times every other day. PQ groups were given either saline (PQ), two doses of Saf (Saf (L), 0.8 mg/kg/day and Saf (H), 3.2 mg/kg/day), pioglitazone (Pio, 5 mg/kg/day), the combination of Saf (L) + Pio, or Dexa (0.03 mg/kg/day) during PQ exposure for 16 days. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and thiol levels decreased, while malondialdehyde (MDA) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung tissue levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin 10 (IL-10), tracheal responsiveness (TR) to methacholine, and lung pathological changes were increased in the PQ group. Significant improvements were seen in all treated groups, with the exception of a few variables in Saf (L). The combination of Saf (L) + Pio had a greater effect than Saf (L) or Pio alone. All comparisons had p values < 0.05 to < 0.001. The Saf and Pio show promising combined preventative abilities, suggesting that the PPARγ receptor plays a role in Saf impact.","PeriodicalId":11756,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Toxicology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.24561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lung and multi-organ injuries are caused by the herbicide paraquat (PQ). Safranal (Saf), the principal compound found in Crocus sativus, exhibits a diverse array of pharmacological properties, encompassing anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, and immunoregulatory activities. The potential preventive impacts of Saf and pioglitazone (Pio), in comparison to dexamethasone (Dexa), were investigated in rats to assess their efficacy in mitigating lung injury induced by PQ aerosol. Saline aerosol was given to the control (Ctrl) group of rats, whereas PQ aerosol was given to the other six groups (PQ), eight times every other day. PQ groups were given either saline (PQ), two doses of Saf (Saf (L), 0.8 mg/kg/day and Saf (H), 3.2 mg/kg/day), pioglitazone (Pio, 5 mg/kg/day), the combination of Saf (L) + Pio, or Dexa (0.03 mg/kg/day) during PQ exposure for 16 days. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and thiol levels decreased, while malondialdehyde (MDA) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), lung tissue levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and interleukin 10 (IL-10), tracheal responsiveness (TR) to methacholine, and lung pathological changes were increased in the PQ group. Significant improvements were seen in all treated groups, with the exception of a few variables in Saf (L). The combination of Saf (L) + Pio had a greater effect than Saf (L) or Pio alone. All comparisons had p values < 0.05 to < 0.001. The Saf and Pio show promising combined preventative abilities, suggesting that the PPARγ receptor plays a role in Saf impact.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes in the areas of toxicity and toxicology of environmental pollutants in air, dust, sediment, soil and water, and natural toxins in the environment.Of particular interest are:
Toxic or biologically disruptive impacts of anthropogenic chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, industrial organics, agricultural chemicals, and by-products such as chlorinated compounds from water disinfection and waste incineration;
Natural toxins and their impacts;
Biotransformation and metabolism of toxigenic compounds, food chains for toxin accumulation or biodegradation;
Assays of toxicity, endocrine disruption, mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, ecosystem impact and health hazard;
Environmental and public health risk assessment, environmental guidelines, environmental policy for toxicants.