Impact of Suboptimal Graft Function at 1 Month Post-Transplantation on Long-Term Outcomes in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 0.8
Young Jun Park, Sang Seob Yun, Sun Cheol Park, Eun Ju Jang, Jeong Kye Hwang, Mi Hyeong Kim, Hyung Jin Cho, Kang Woong Jun, Ji Il Kim, Sangkyun Mok
{"title":"Impact of Suboptimal Graft Function at 1 Month Post-Transplantation on Long-Term Outcomes in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Young Jun Park, Sang Seob Yun, Sun Cheol Park, Eun Ju Jang, Jeong Kye Hwang, Mi Hyeong Kim, Hyung Jin Cho, Kang Woong Jun, Ji Il Kim, Sangkyun Mok","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.09.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While most recipients of living donor kidney transplantation experience rapid recovery of renal function, a subset shows suboptimal recovery of graft function despite sufficient postoperative time. The long-term implications of this suboptimal recovery of graft function remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of patients with suboptimal renal function 1-month post-transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed 411 living donor kidney transplant recipients at a single center from January 2006 to February 2014, with a mean follow-up of 11.3 years. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on 1-month post-transplant serum creatinine: suboptimal (>1.2 mg/dL) and standard (≤1.2 mg/dL). Clinical, immunological, and donor-recipient variables were compared. Primary outcomes included acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used for outcome assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The suboptimal group comprised 84 patients (20.4%). They were younger, predominantly male, had higher body mass index, and more frequently received smaller grafts from older donors with lower donor-to-recipient weight ratios. Acute rejection within 1 month occurred more frequently in this group (8.3% vs. 1.8%, P = .007). Despite these differences, no significant differences were observed in graft failure, mortality, infections, or malignancies, and long-term graft or patient survival did not differ significantly between the suboptimal and standard groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Suboptimal graft function at 1-month post-transplantation is associated with increased acute rejection but does not independently predict inferior long-term graft or patient survival. These findings suggest that long-term outcomes can be preserved despite suboptimal functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94258,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2025.09.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While most recipients of living donor kidney transplantation experience rapid recovery of renal function, a subset shows suboptimal recovery of graft function despite sufficient postoperative time. The long-term implications of this suboptimal recovery of graft function remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of patients with suboptimal renal function 1-month post-transplantation.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 411 living donor kidney transplant recipients at a single center from January 2006 to February 2014, with a mean follow-up of 11.3 years. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on 1-month post-transplant serum creatinine: suboptimal (>1.2 mg/dL) and standard (≤1.2 mg/dL). Clinical, immunological, and donor-recipient variables were compared. Primary outcomes included acute rejection, graft survival, and patient survival. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used for outcome assessment.

Results: The suboptimal group comprised 84 patients (20.4%). They were younger, predominantly male, had higher body mass index, and more frequently received smaller grafts from older donors with lower donor-to-recipient weight ratios. Acute rejection within 1 month occurred more frequently in this group (8.3% vs. 1.8%, P = .007). Despite these differences, no significant differences were observed in graft failure, mortality, infections, or malignancies, and long-term graft or patient survival did not differ significantly between the suboptimal and standard groups.

Conclusions: Suboptimal graft function at 1-month post-transplantation is associated with increased acute rejection but does not independently predict inferior long-term graft or patient survival. These findings suggest that long-term outcomes can be preserved despite suboptimal functional recovery.

活体肾移植受者移植后1个月移植功能不理想对长期预后的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
导言:虽然大多数活体肾移植受者肾功能恢复迅速,但有一小部分人尽管术后时间充足,但移植功能恢复不理想。这种次优的移植物功能恢复的长期影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估移植后1个月肾功能不佳患者的长期预后。方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了2006年1月至2014年2月在单一中心进行的411例活体肾移植受者,平均随访11.3年。根据移植后1个月血清肌酐水平将患者分为2组:亚优组(bb0 1.2 mg/dL)和标准组(≤1.2 mg/dL)。比较临床、免疫学和供体-受体变量。主要结局包括急性排斥反应、移植物存活和患者存活。结果评价采用Kaplan-Meier分析和log-rank分析。结果:次优组84例(20.4%)。他们更年轻,主要是男性,身体质量指数更高,更频繁地从供体与受体体重比较低的老年供体那里接受较小的移植物。该组1个月内发生急性排斥反应的频率更高(8.3% vs. 1.8%, P = .007)。尽管存在这些差异,但在移植失败、死亡率、感染或恶性肿瘤方面没有观察到显著差异,在次优组和标准组之间,长期移植或患者生存没有显著差异。结论:移植后1个月的次优移植物功能与急性排斥反应增加相关,但不能独立预测较差的长期移植物或患者生存。这些发现表明,尽管功能恢复欠佳,但可以保留长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信