Association between clinical learning portfolio recording and medical students' competencies and entrustable professional activities in Taiwan.

IF 2.4
Jen-Feng Liang, Wan-Yu Yeh, Shiau-Shian Huang, Hsiao-Yun Yeh, Hsiao-Chin Shen, Chia-Chang Huang, Yi-Hsuan Lin, Hao-Min Cheng, Ying-Ying Yang, Jiing-Feng Lirng, Chen-Huan Chen, Shuu-Jiun Wang
{"title":"Association between clinical learning portfolio recording and medical students' competencies and entrustable professional activities in Taiwan.","authors":"Jen-Feng Liang, Wan-Yu Yeh, Shiau-Shian Huang, Hsiao-Yun Yeh, Hsiao-Chin Shen, Chia-Chang Huang, Yi-Hsuan Lin, Hao-Min Cheng, Ying-Ying Yang, Jiing-Feng Lirng, Chen-Huan Chen, Shuu-Jiun Wang","doi":"10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical reflection-oriented learning portfolio is widely applied in clinical rotation but it is time-consuming for clinical trainees and the effect on learning is still questionable. This study aims to provide effectiveness evidence of learning portfolio by examining the association between learning portfolio appraisal and clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2020 to 2022, data were evaluated to investigate the relationship between excellent portfolio award status, proficiency in entrustable professional activities (EPAs)-based assessments, and clinical competencies based on the core EPAs for entering residency of the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), as well as eight core competencies evaluated every two weeks from each clinical department. In addition, clerks who continued their second-year clerkship at the research hospital (continuous follow-up group) were analyzed to further explore the association between first-year award status and second-year clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 148 first-year clerks were included in the overall group (award recipients and non-recipients). Among them, 86 continued their clerkship at the research hospital in the second year (continuous follow-up group). In the overall group, compared with excellent learning portfolio non-recipients, award recipients demonstrated higher scores in 11 of the 13 EPAs and in all 8 core competencies. Moreover, higher-frequency award winners obtained significantly higher scores compared to lower-frequency award winners. Stratified analyses based on gender yielded similar results during clerkship. However, this beneficial association was not observed in the continuous follow-up group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This database study supports that better learning portfolio recording is associated with better clinical performance during early stage of clerkship. Learning portfolio could be an effective tool to facilitate clinical in early clerkship.</p>","PeriodicalId":94115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000001297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical reflection-oriented learning portfolio is widely applied in clinical rotation but it is time-consuming for clinical trainees and the effect on learning is still questionable. This study aims to provide effectiveness evidence of learning portfolio by examining the association between learning portfolio appraisal and clinical performance.

Methods: From 2020 to 2022, data were evaluated to investigate the relationship between excellent portfolio award status, proficiency in entrustable professional activities (EPAs)-based assessments, and clinical competencies based on the core EPAs for entering residency of the American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC), as well as eight core competencies evaluated every two weeks from each clinical department. In addition, clerks who continued their second-year clerkship at the research hospital (continuous follow-up group) were analyzed to further explore the association between first-year award status and second-year clinical outcomes.

Results: A total of 148 first-year clerks were included in the overall group (award recipients and non-recipients). Among them, 86 continued their clerkship at the research hospital in the second year (continuous follow-up group). In the overall group, compared with excellent learning portfolio non-recipients, award recipients demonstrated higher scores in 11 of the 13 EPAs and in all 8 core competencies. Moreover, higher-frequency award winners obtained significantly higher scores compared to lower-frequency award winners. Stratified analyses based on gender yielded similar results during clerkship. However, this beneficial association was not observed in the continuous follow-up group.

Conclusion: This database study supports that better learning portfolio recording is associated with better clinical performance during early stage of clerkship. Learning portfolio could be an effective tool to facilitate clinical in early clerkship.

临床学习档案记录与台湾医学生能力及可信赖专业活动之关系。
背景:临床反思导向学习组合在临床轮转中得到广泛应用,但对临床实习生耗时长,对学习效果的影响尚存疑问。本研究旨在检视学习档案评估与临床表现的关系,以提供学习档案的有效性证据。方法:对2020 - 2022年的数据进行评估,探讨优秀组合奖励状况、基于可委托专业活动(EPAs)评估的熟练程度与进入美国医学院协会(AAMC)住院医师的核心EPAs临床能力之间的关系,以及每两周从每个临床科室评估的8项核心能力。此外,我们还分析了在研究医院继续第二年实习的职员(连续随访组),以进一步探讨第一年的奖励状况与第二年临床结果之间的关系。结果:整体组共纳入148名第一年办事员(获奖者和非获奖者)。其中86人在第二年继续在研究医院工作(连续随访组)。在整个小组中,与优秀学习组合的非获奖者相比,获奖者在13个EPAs中的11个以及所有8个核心竞争力中表现出更高的分数。此外,高频获奖者的得分明显高于低频获奖者。基于性别的分层分析也得出了类似的结果。然而,在连续随访组中没有观察到这种有益的关联。结论:本数据库研究支持较好的学习档案记录与较好的临床表现相关。学习档案是促进临床早期实习的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信