On carrier frequency in transcutaneous spinal cord electrical stimulation: a narrative review.

IF 3.8
Natalia Shamantseva, Tatiana Moshonkina
{"title":"On carrier frequency in transcutaneous spinal cord electrical stimulation: a narrative review.","authors":"Natalia Shamantseva, Tatiana Moshonkina","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/ae08e8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) using kilohertz frequency carrier modulation has emerged as a non-invasive neuromodulation approach to improve motor recovery and reduce pain. Early application of 5-10 kHz modulated pulses for tSCS has shown promising results in spinal cord (SC) injury and post-stroke rehabilitation, but the mechanisms underlying these effects remain poorly understood.<i>Approach.</i>This narrative review synthesizes electrophysiological, computational and clinical evidence to assess how kilohertz modulation influences spinal and corticospinal excitability and analgesia. A total of 20 preclinical and clinical studies comparing the effects of kHz-modulated and conventional stimulation pulses were reviewed.<i>Main results.</i>The results indicate that kilohertz modulated tSCS increases tolerance to stimulation, but requires a higher charge to evoke motor responses in healthy participants and individuals with post-stroke motor disorder. Compared to conventional stimulation, modulated stimulation recruits afferents less efficiently at motor threshold intensity but appears to engage broader corticospinal circuits, especially near or below threshold. Frequency-specific effects include prolonged spinal inhibition, frequency-dependent modulation of supraspinal input, and selective activation of inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal horn. Computational study supports these observations, showing that kilohertz pulses produce delayed action potential initiation due to alternating depolarization cycles. A comparative functional study has shown that modulated tSCS improves motor function in individuals with SC injury more significantly than conventional stimulation.<i>Significance.</i>This narrative review highlights gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms of modulated tSCS, suggests directions for further research and will be useful in planning studies on the mechanisms behind tSCS with and without carrier frequency. It also holds engineering relevance for the optimal design of stimulation devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/ae08e8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) using kilohertz frequency carrier modulation has emerged as a non-invasive neuromodulation approach to improve motor recovery and reduce pain. Early application of 5-10 kHz modulated pulses for tSCS has shown promising results in spinal cord (SC) injury and post-stroke rehabilitation, but the mechanisms underlying these effects remain poorly understood.Approach.This narrative review synthesizes electrophysiological, computational and clinical evidence to assess how kilohertz modulation influences spinal and corticospinal excitability and analgesia. A total of 20 preclinical and clinical studies comparing the effects of kHz-modulated and conventional stimulation pulses were reviewed.Main results.The results indicate that kilohertz modulated tSCS increases tolerance to stimulation, but requires a higher charge to evoke motor responses in healthy participants and individuals with post-stroke motor disorder. Compared to conventional stimulation, modulated stimulation recruits afferents less efficiently at motor threshold intensity but appears to engage broader corticospinal circuits, especially near or below threshold. Frequency-specific effects include prolonged spinal inhibition, frequency-dependent modulation of supraspinal input, and selective activation of inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal horn. Computational study supports these observations, showing that kilohertz pulses produce delayed action potential initiation due to alternating depolarization cycles. A comparative functional study has shown that modulated tSCS improves motor function in individuals with SC injury more significantly than conventional stimulation.Significance.This narrative review highlights gaps in our understanding of the mechanisms of modulated tSCS, suggests directions for further research and will be useful in planning studies on the mechanisms behind tSCS with and without carrier frequency. It also holds engineering relevance for the optimal design of stimulation devices.

经皮脊髓电刺激的载波频率:叙述回顾。
目的:采用千赫兹载波调制的经皮脊髓刺激(tSCS)已成为一种非侵入性神经调节方法,可改善运动恢复和减轻疼痛。早期应用5-10 kHz调制脉冲tSCS在脊髓损伤和脑卒中后康复中显示出有希望的结果,但这些作用的机制仍然知之甚少。方法:本文综合电生理、计算和临床证据来评估千赫兹调制如何影响脊髓和皮质脊髓兴奋性和镇痛。本文回顾了20项临床前和临床研究,比较了khz调制和常规刺激脉冲的效果。主要结果:结果表明,在健康参与者和中风后运动障碍个体中,千赫调制的tSCS增加了对刺激的耐受性,但需要更高的电荷来唤起运动反应。与传统刺激相比,调制刺激在运动阈值强度下招募传入神经的效率较低,但似乎涉及更广泛的皮质脊髓回路,特别是在阈值附近或以下。频率特异性效应包括延长脊髓抑制,椎管上输入的频率依赖性调节,以及背角抑制性中间神经元的选择性激活。计算研究支持这些观察结果,表明由于交替去极化周期,千赫兹脉冲产生延迟动作电位起始。一项比较功能研究表明,与常规刺激相比,调节tSCS能更显著地改善脊髓损伤患者的运动功能。意义:这篇叙述性综述强调了我们对调制tSCS机制的理解差距,提出了进一步研究的方向,并将有助于规划有载波频率和无载波频率下tSCS背后机制的研究。这对于优化设计增产装置也具有一定的工程意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信