Capturing expert uncertainty: ICC-informed soft labelling for volcano-seismicity.

IF 3.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Bulletin of Volcanology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s00445-025-01875-4
Sam Mitchinson, Jessica H Johnson, Ben Milner, Oliver Lamb, Yannik Behr
{"title":"Capturing expert uncertainty: ICC-informed soft labelling for volcano-seismicity.","authors":"Sam Mitchinson, Jessica H Johnson, Ben Milner, Oliver Lamb, Yannik Behr","doi":"10.1007/s00445-025-01875-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reliable classification of volcano-seismic signals underpins monitoring and eruption forecasting and is an essential tool for advancing understanding of subsurface processes. However, traditional approaches may overlook the inherent uncertainty and variability between expert judgments. We introduce an innovative method that explicitly quantifies inter-expert agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and incorporates this measure into probabilistic, ICC-informed soft labels, which can be fed into machine learning pipelines. We conducted a global survey involving 89 experts who classified a set of 80 volcano-seismic events from Ruapehu, New Zealand, providing continuous ratings for standard categories: volcano tectonic (VT), hybrid (HYB), long-period (LP), and other (OT). ICC agreement scores revealed that single-rater scores produce poor agreement between experts even for well-established VT and LP classifications. However, reliability significantly improved for these classifications when multiple expert ratings were combined, although, for HYB and OT categories, expert disagreement remained substantial. We developed a soft labelling methodology that weights class probabilities by their respective ICC scores, resulting in a distribution that naturally reflects expert uncertainty. This demonstrates that ICC-informed soft labels could provide a robust alternative to the hard label standard by explicitly capturing classification uncertainty and variability. Our fully probabilistic view has the potential to significantly enhance machine learning model accuracy, robustness, and transferability across volcanic systems and should provide a fundamental shift in how volcano-seismic data are labelled and interpreted within automated monitoring frameworks.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00445-025-01875-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":55297,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Volcanology","volume":"87 10","pages":"84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12441074/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Volcanology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-025-01875-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reliable classification of volcano-seismic signals underpins monitoring and eruption forecasting and is an essential tool for advancing understanding of subsurface processes. However, traditional approaches may overlook the inherent uncertainty and variability between expert judgments. We introduce an innovative method that explicitly quantifies inter-expert agreement using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and incorporates this measure into probabilistic, ICC-informed soft labels, which can be fed into machine learning pipelines. We conducted a global survey involving 89 experts who classified a set of 80 volcano-seismic events from Ruapehu, New Zealand, providing continuous ratings for standard categories: volcano tectonic (VT), hybrid (HYB), long-period (LP), and other (OT). ICC agreement scores revealed that single-rater scores produce poor agreement between experts even for well-established VT and LP classifications. However, reliability significantly improved for these classifications when multiple expert ratings were combined, although, for HYB and OT categories, expert disagreement remained substantial. We developed a soft labelling methodology that weights class probabilities by their respective ICC scores, resulting in a distribution that naturally reflects expert uncertainty. This demonstrates that ICC-informed soft labels could provide a robust alternative to the hard label standard by explicitly capturing classification uncertainty and variability. Our fully probabilistic view has the potential to significantly enhance machine learning model accuracy, robustness, and transferability across volcanic systems and should provide a fundamental shift in how volcano-seismic data are labelled and interpreted within automated monitoring frameworks.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00445-025-01875-4.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

捕捉专家的不确定性:icc通知的火山-地震活动性软标记。
火山地震信号的可靠分类是监测和喷发预报的基础,也是促进对地下过程理解的重要工具。然而,传统方法可能忽略了专家判断之间固有的不确定性和可变性。我们引入了一种创新的方法,使用类内相关系数(ICC)明确量化专家间的协议,并将该措施纳入概率,ICC通知软标签,可以馈送到机器学习管道中。我们进行了一项涉及89位专家的全球调查,他们对来自新西兰鲁阿佩胡的80个火山地震事件进行了分类,提供了连续的标准类别:火山构造(VT),混合(HYB),长周期(LP)和其他(OT)。ICC协议分数显示,即使对于公认的VT和LP分类,单一评分也会导致专家之间的不一致。然而,当多个专家评级结合在一起时,这些分类的可靠性显著提高,尽管对于HYB和OT类别,专家的分歧仍然很大。我们开发了一种软标记方法,通过各自的ICC分数对分类概率进行加权,从而产生自然反映专家不确定性的分布。这表明,通过明确捕获分类不确定性和可变性,icc知情软标签可以为硬标签标准提供一个强大的替代方案。我们的全概率观点有可能显著提高机器学习模型的准确性、鲁棒性和跨火山系统的可转移性,并应该在自动监测框架内如何标记和解释火山地震数据方面提供根本性的转变。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,可在10.1007/s00445-025-01875-4获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bulletin of Volcanology
Bulletin of Volcanology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Volcanology was founded in 1922, as Bulletin Volcanologique, and is the official journal of the International Association of Volcanology and Chemistry of the Earth’s Interior (IAVCEI). The Bulletin of Volcanology publishes papers on volcanoes, their products, their eruptive behavior, and their hazards. Papers aimed at understanding the deeper structure of volcanoes, and the evolution of magmatic systems using geochemical, petrological, and geophysical techniques are also published. Material is published in four sections: Review Articles; Research Articles; Short Scientific Communications; and a Forum that provides for discussion of controversial issues and for comment and reply on previously published Articles and Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信