Managing Dependence: Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care

IF 2.3 3区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Mercer E. Gary
{"title":"Managing Dependence: Assistive Technologies in Dementia Care","authors":"Mercer E. Gary","doi":"10.1002/hast.5001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conversations about dependency must balance competing concerns too often consolidated into opposing narratives. On the one hand, our cultural premium on autonomy casts dependency as a weakness and a tragedy, if not a moral failing. On the other hand, efforts to resist this dominant narrative reframe dependency as the rule and not the exception. Extending this delicate balancing act to emerging modalities of dementia care poses additional questions. What should we make of apparently increasing levels of dependence on technology, as opposed to on humans? Confronting both the technophobic and technophilic extremes at once––alongside the polarized views of dependency that underlie them––provides us with clearer resources for reformulating narratives about technology in dementia care. What we need is an account of dependence that recognizes its ubiquity and moral significance while also acknowledging that it requires work that is widely devalued and that can exacerbate vulnerabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55073,"journal":{"name":"Hastings Center Report","volume":"55 S1","pages":"S111-S116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hast.5001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hastings Center Report","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hast.5001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conversations about dependency must balance competing concerns too often consolidated into opposing narratives. On the one hand, our cultural premium on autonomy casts dependency as a weakness and a tragedy, if not a moral failing. On the other hand, efforts to resist this dominant narrative reframe dependency as the rule and not the exception. Extending this delicate balancing act to emerging modalities of dementia care poses additional questions. What should we make of apparently increasing levels of dependence on technology, as opposed to on humans? Confronting both the technophobic and technophilic extremes at once––alongside the polarized views of dependency that underlie them––provides us with clearer resources for reformulating narratives about technology in dementia care. What we need is an account of dependence that recognizes its ubiquity and moral significance while also acknowledging that it requires work that is widely devalued and that can exacerbate vulnerabilities.

管理依赖:痴呆护理中的辅助技术。
关于依赖性的对话必须平衡相互竞争的关注,而这些关注往往被整合成对立的叙述。一方面,我们崇尚自主的文化将依赖视为一种弱点和悲剧,如果不是道德上的失败的话。另一方面,抵制这种主导叙事的努力将依赖重新定义为规则,而不是例外。将这种微妙的平衡行为扩展到痴呆症护理的新兴模式会带来额外的问题。相对于对人类的依赖,我们对科技的依赖程度明显增加,我们该如何理解?同时面对技术恐惧症和技术狂热这两种极端——以及它们背后关于依赖的两极化观点——为我们提供了更清晰的资源,以重新制定有关痴呆症护理中的技术的叙述。我们需要的是一种对依赖的解释,承认它的普遍性和道德意义,同时也承认它所需要的工作被广泛低估,可能会加剧脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hastings Center Report
Hastings Center Report 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Hastings Center Report explores ethical, legal, and social issues in medicine, health care, public health, and the life sciences. Six issues per year offer articles, essays, case studies of bioethical problems, columns on law and policy, caregivers’ stories, peer-reviewed scholarly articles, and book reviews. Authors come from an assortment of professions and academic disciplines and express a range of perspectives and political opinions. The Report’s readership includes physicians, nurses, scholars, administrators, social workers, health lawyers, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信