Comparison of Early Clinical Outcomes in Early Versus Delayed Urethral Catheter Removal Following Open Simple Retropubic Prostatectomy.

Peter Olalekan Odeyemi, Tolulope Taiwo Ogunfowora, Hamid Babajide Olanipekun, Taofiq Olayinka Mohammed, Arinzechukwu Mbanefo Egbuniwe, Ademola Alabi Popoola
{"title":"Comparison of Early Clinical Outcomes in Early Versus Delayed Urethral Catheter Removal Following Open Simple Retropubic Prostatectomy.","authors":"Peter Olalekan Odeyemi, Tolulope Taiwo Ogunfowora, Hamid Babajide Olanipekun, Taofiq Olayinka Mohammed, Arinzechukwu Mbanefo Egbuniwe, Ademola Alabi Popoola","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_61_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the clear advantages of endoscopic management for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, open simple prostatectomy (OSP) is still relevant in developing nations like Nigeria. Open simple retropubic prostatectomy is commonly used because it gives direct access to the prostate with improved achievement of haemostasis, early recovery, and less risk of bladder neck stenosis. Urethral catheter (UC) is traditionally used following prostatectomy, not only for drainage of the urinary bladder but also for stenting, and it sometimes results in haemostasis. There is no consensus on the duration of urethral catheterisation, which varies between surgeons and institutions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare the early clinical outcomes following 3rd day (early) versus 6th day (delayed) UC removal following open simple retropubic prostatectomy.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was a prospective, hospital-based, randomised comparative study. Patients were randomised to groups A (3rd day post-operative UC removal) and B (6th day post-operative UC removal) using simple randomisation.</p><p><strong>Data analysis and result presentation: </strong>Data were collected with the aid of a purposefully designed proforma and entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21 for analysis. Tables and charts were used to represent descriptive statistics. Chi-square and Student <i>t</i> test were used to test significant differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. <i>P</i> value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients were recruited into the study. Patients were randomised into group A (third day catheter removal) and group B (sixth day catheter removal), with 25 patients in each arm of the study. The mean age was 70.92 ± 13.98 years (range 50-81 years). No patient required recatheterisation following 3rd and 6th day of catheter removal. The average urethral pain scores during the first void after removal of the UC on the 3rd and 6th postoperative days were 2.52 ± 2.00 and 1.04 ± 1.00, respectively; <i>P</i> value was <0.001. The urethral pain score reduced significantly in groups A and B to 1.00 ± 1.00 and 0.32 ± 0.00, respectively, within 24 h of the removal of the catheter with <i>P</i> value of 0.001. The average lengths of hospital stay were 4.20 ± 4.00 and 7.24 ± 7.00 for patients in group A and B, respectively, with <i>P</i> value < 0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>OSP can be brought closer to the \"Gold standard\" (transurethral resection of the prostate) by early catheter removal and short hospital stay with satisfactory early post-operative outcomes. The initial urethral pain improves significantly within 24 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":"15 4","pages":"386-393"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_61_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the clear advantages of endoscopic management for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia, open simple prostatectomy (OSP) is still relevant in developing nations like Nigeria. Open simple retropubic prostatectomy is commonly used because it gives direct access to the prostate with improved achievement of haemostasis, early recovery, and less risk of bladder neck stenosis. Urethral catheter (UC) is traditionally used following prostatectomy, not only for drainage of the urinary bladder but also for stenting, and it sometimes results in haemostasis. There is no consensus on the duration of urethral catheterisation, which varies between surgeons and institutions.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the early clinical outcomes following 3rd day (early) versus 6th day (delayed) UC removal following open simple retropubic prostatectomy.

Materials and methods: The study was a prospective, hospital-based, randomised comparative study. Patients were randomised to groups A (3rd day post-operative UC removal) and B (6th day post-operative UC removal) using simple randomisation.

Data analysis and result presentation: Data were collected with the aid of a purposefully designed proforma and entered into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21 for analysis. Tables and charts were used to represent descriptive statistics. Chi-square and Student t test were used to test significant differences in categorical and continuous variables, respectively. P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Fifty patients were recruited into the study. Patients were randomised into group A (third day catheter removal) and group B (sixth day catheter removal), with 25 patients in each arm of the study. The mean age was 70.92 ± 13.98 years (range 50-81 years). No patient required recatheterisation following 3rd and 6th day of catheter removal. The average urethral pain scores during the first void after removal of the UC on the 3rd and 6th postoperative days were 2.52 ± 2.00 and 1.04 ± 1.00, respectively; P value was <0.001. The urethral pain score reduced significantly in groups A and B to 1.00 ± 1.00 and 0.32 ± 0.00, respectively, within 24 h of the removal of the catheter with P value of 0.001. The average lengths of hospital stay were 4.20 ± 4.00 and 7.24 ± 7.00 for patients in group A and B, respectively, with P value < 0.001.

Conclusion: OSP can be brought closer to the "Gold standard" (transurethral resection of the prostate) by early catheter removal and short hospital stay with satisfactory early post-operative outcomes. The initial urethral pain improves significantly within 24 h.

开放性单纯耻骨后前列腺切除术后早期与延迟导尿管拔除的早期临床结果比较。
背景:尽管内镜治疗良性前列腺增生具有明显的优势,但开放性单纯性前列腺切除术(OSP)在尼日利亚等发展中国家仍然具有重要意义。开放性单纯耻骨后前列腺切除术是常用的,因为它可以直接进入前列腺,止血效果更好,早期恢复,膀胱颈狭窄的风险更小。导尿管(UC)传统上用于前列腺切除术后,不仅用于膀胱引流,还用于支架置入,有时会导致止血。导尿的持续时间在外科医生和机构之间没有共识。目的:我们旨在比较开放性耻骨后前列腺切除术后第3天(早期)和第6天(延迟)UC切除的早期临床结果。材料和方法:本研究是一项前瞻性、以医院为基础的随机比较研究。采用简单随机法将患者随机分为A组(术后第3天UC切除)和B组(术后第6天UC切除)。数据分析和结果展示:通过有目的设计的形式表格收集数据,并输入社会科学统计软件包第21版进行分析。表格和图表被用来表示描述性统计。用卡方检验和学生t检验分别检验分类变量和连续变量的显著性差异。结果的P值:50例患者被纳入研究。患者被随机分为A组(第3天拔除导管)和B组(第6天拔除导管),每组25例患者。平均年龄70.92±13.98岁(50 ~ 81岁)。在拔管后第3天和第6天,没有患者需要重新插管。术后第3天、第6天尿道疼痛评分分别为2.52±2.00、1.04±1.00;P值为0.001。A组和B组患者的平均住院时间分别为4.20±4.00和7.24±7.00,P值< 0.001。结论:早期拔管、缩短住院时间可使OSP更接近“金标准”(经尿道前列腺切除术),术后早期疗效满意。最初的尿道疼痛在24小时内明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信