Postoperative Bile Leak in Liver Hydatid Cyst: When to Intervene?

Krishna Rao Gurana, Mukteshwar Dasari, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Julie Shah, Abhijit Chandra
{"title":"Postoperative Bile Leak in Liver Hydatid Cyst: When to Intervene?","authors":"Krishna Rao Gurana, Mukteshwar Dasari, Vijay Kumar Sharma, Julie Shah, Abhijit Chandra","doi":"10.4103/jwas.jwas_143_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative bile leak (POBL), a major concern in liver hydatid cyst (LHC) surgery, can be managed either conservatively or by endoscopic therapy. There is a need for some objective parameters to guide endoscopic therapy for POBL in LHC surgery.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>This study was carried out in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology in a tertiary care centre in Northern India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 116 surgically managed patients for LHC were analysed retrospectively using regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to identify factors predicting endoscopic therapy in POBL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POBL was found in 31.8% (37 of 116) of patients. Most of the patients had POBL <300 mL/day (67.6%). Patients with POBL experienced more morbidity (<i>P</i> = 0.0001) in comparison with patients without POBL. Out of 37 patients with POBL, 22 (59.5%) were managed conservatively, and 15 (40.5%) were managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Patients with POBL managed with endoscopic therapy had higher daily bile output (<i>P</i> = 0.055), longer time to removal of drain (<i>P</i> = 0.002), and longer postoperative stay (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) when compared with conservatively managed patients. Male gender [Odds ratio (OR) = 5.10, p=0.026], POBL >300 mL/day (OR = 5.143, <i>P</i> = 0.031), POBL >14 days (OR = 6.800, <i>P</i> = 0.010), and hospital stay >14 days (OR = 11.42, <i>P</i> = 0.007) predicted the need for endoscopic therapy in managing POBL. On ROC curve analysis, daily POBL >210 mL [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.773, <i>P</i> = 0.005] and POBL for >12.5 days (AUC = 0.826, <i>P</i> = 0.001) were cut-off values for the need for endoscopic therapy for managing POBL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POBL in LHC surgery is a serious problem. Male patients with daily POBL >300 mL, bile leak >14 days, and hospital stay >14 days had higher chances for the need for endoscopic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":73993,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","volume":"15 4","pages":"463-470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the West African College of Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jwas.jwas_143_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative bile leak (POBL), a major concern in liver hydatid cyst (LHC) surgery, can be managed either conservatively or by endoscopic therapy. There is a need for some objective parameters to guide endoscopic therapy for POBL in LHC surgery.

Setting: This study was carried out in the Department of Surgical Gastroenterology in a tertiary care centre in Northern India.

Materials and methods: A total of 116 surgically managed patients for LHC were analysed retrospectively using regression analysis and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves to identify factors predicting endoscopic therapy in POBL.

Results: POBL was found in 31.8% (37 of 116) of patients. Most of the patients had POBL <300 mL/day (67.6%). Patients with POBL experienced more morbidity (P = 0.0001) in comparison with patients without POBL. Out of 37 patients with POBL, 22 (59.5%) were managed conservatively, and 15 (40.5%) were managed with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Patients with POBL managed with endoscopic therapy had higher daily bile output (P = 0.055), longer time to removal of drain (P = 0.002), and longer postoperative stay (P < 0.0001) when compared with conservatively managed patients. Male gender [Odds ratio (OR) = 5.10, p=0.026], POBL >300 mL/day (OR = 5.143, P = 0.031), POBL >14 days (OR = 6.800, P = 0.010), and hospital stay >14 days (OR = 11.42, P = 0.007) predicted the need for endoscopic therapy in managing POBL. On ROC curve analysis, daily POBL >210 mL [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.773, P = 0.005] and POBL for >12.5 days (AUC = 0.826, P = 0.001) were cut-off values for the need for endoscopic therapy for managing POBL.

Conclusion: POBL in LHC surgery is a serious problem. Male patients with daily POBL >300 mL, bile leak >14 days, and hospital stay >14 days had higher chances for the need for endoscopic therapy.

肝包虫囊肿术后胆漏:何时干预?
背景:术后胆漏(POBL)是肝包虫囊肿(LHC)手术中的一个主要问题,可以保守治疗或内窥镜治疗。需要一些客观参数来指导LHC手术中POBL的内镜治疗。环境:本研究在印度北部三级保健中心的外科消化内科进行。材料与方法:采用回归分析和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线对116例手术治疗的LHC患者进行回顾性分析,以确定内镜下治疗POBL的预测因素。结果:116例患者中37例(31.8%)出现POBL。与无POBL患者相比,大多数患者有POBL (P = 0.0001)。37例POBL患者中,22例(59.5%)采用保守治疗,15例(40.5%)采用内窥镜逆行胆管造影治疗。与保守治疗的患者相比,经内镜治疗的POBL患者每日胆汁输出量更高(P = 0.055),引流管移除时间更长(P = 0.002),术后住院时间更长(P < 0.0001)。男性性别[优势比(OR) = 5.10, p=0.026]、POBL >300 mL/天(OR = 5.143, p= 0.031)、POBL >14天(OR = 6.800, p= 0.010)和住院>14天(OR = 11.42, p= 0.007)预测了内镜下治疗POBL的必要性。在ROC曲线分析中,每日POBL bb0 210 mL[曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.773, P = 0.005]和bb1 12.5天的POBL (AUC = 0.826, P = 0.001)是需要内镜治疗治疗POBL的临界值。结论:LHC手术中POBL是一个严重的问题。男性患者每日POBL >300 mL,胆漏>14 d,住院>14 d,需要内镜治疗的几率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信