Beyond the numbers: the importance of contextual data when reusing blood pressure data from electronic health records.

IF 3.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in digital health Pub Date : 2025-09-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1664213
Marieke E Grünewald, Erik Koomen, Lex M van Loon, Ankit Gupta, Robin W M Vernooij, Wouter W van Solinge, Teus Kappen, Saskia Haitjema
{"title":"Beyond the numbers: the importance of contextual data when reusing blood pressure data from electronic health records.","authors":"Marieke E Grünewald, Erik Koomen, Lex M van Loon, Ankit Gupta, Robin W M Vernooij, Wouter W van Solinge, Teus Kappen, Saskia Haitjema","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2025.1664213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the digitization of health records, the reuse of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data has become increasingly prevalent in research. Using blood pressure as a case study, this paper examines the complexities and practical realities of reusing EHR data, emphasizing the importance of contextual information for accurate interpretation. Although blood pressure data derived from EHR systems may appear straightforward-often captured by machines or derived from standardized workflows-their reuse is frequently complicated by variability in measurement methods and clinical contexts, which can produce seemingly similar but clinically distinct blood pressure readings. The paper begins with the physiology of blood pressure and the various techniques used to measure it. This is followed by an analysis of different clinical settings-i.e., the different pathophysiological situations-that may affect both measurement practices and data interpretation. The paper then explores how these measurements are recorded in EHR systems and concludes with practical guidance to support researchers in identifying blood pressure data that are truly fit for the intended research purpose. By acknowledging the inherent complexities of healthcare data and making informed data selection decisions, researchers can better harness the potential of EHRs to generate meaningful insights that ultimately improve patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73078,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in digital health","volume":"7 ","pages":"1664213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440906/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.1664213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the digitization of health records, the reuse of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data has become increasingly prevalent in research. Using blood pressure as a case study, this paper examines the complexities and practical realities of reusing EHR data, emphasizing the importance of contextual information for accurate interpretation. Although blood pressure data derived from EHR systems may appear straightforward-often captured by machines or derived from standardized workflows-their reuse is frequently complicated by variability in measurement methods and clinical contexts, which can produce seemingly similar but clinically distinct blood pressure readings. The paper begins with the physiology of blood pressure and the various techniques used to measure it. This is followed by an analysis of different clinical settings-i.e., the different pathophysiological situations-that may affect both measurement practices and data interpretation. The paper then explores how these measurements are recorded in EHR systems and concludes with practical guidance to support researchers in identifying blood pressure data that are truly fit for the intended research purpose. By acknowledging the inherent complexities of healthcare data and making informed data selection decisions, researchers can better harness the potential of EHRs to generate meaningful insights that ultimately improve patient care.

Abstract Image

数字之外:当重复使用电子健康记录中的血压数据时,上下文数据的重要性。
随着健康档案的数字化,电子健康档案(EHR)数据的重用在研究中越来越普遍。以血压为例,本文探讨了重复使用电子病历数据的复杂性和实际情况,强调了上下文信息对准确解释的重要性。尽管从电子病历系统中获得的血压数据可能看起来很简单——通常由机器捕获或从标准化的工作流程中获得——但由于测量方法和临床环境的变化,这些数据的重用往往会变得复杂,这些测量方法和临床环境可能产生看似相似但临床不同的血压读数。这篇论文从血压的生理学和各种测量血压的技术开始。接下来是对不同临床环境的分析。不同的病理生理情况,可能会影响测量方法和数据解释。然后,论文探讨了如何在EHR系统中记录这些测量结果,并给出了实用的指导,以支持研究人员识别真正适合预期研究目的的血压数据。通过认识到医疗保健数据固有的复杂性并做出明智的数据选择决策,研究人员可以更好地利用电子病历的潜力,产生有意义的见解,最终改善患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信