Timing of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization relative to surgical evacuation for chronic and subacute subdural hematomas.

Huanwen Chen, Matthew K McIntyre, Dhairya A Lakhani, Hamza A Salim, Ajay Malhotra, Marco Colasurdo, Dheeraj Gandhi
{"title":"Timing of adjunctive middle meningeal artery embolization relative to surgical evacuation for chronic and subacute subdural hematomas.","authors":"Huanwen Chen, Matthew K McIntyre, Dhairya A Lakhani, Hamza A Salim, Ajay Malhotra, Marco Colasurdo, Dheeraj Gandhi","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A9003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Recent randomized trials have suggested that middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an effective treatment for preventing the recurrence of subacute and chronic subdural hematoma (SDH). As such, MMAE is increasingly being adopted as the standard of care worldwide, and it is projected to become the most common neuro-interventional procedure by 2029. While MMAE is an effective surgical adjunct, the optimal timing of MMAE relative to surgical evacuation remains unclear. This study evaluated whether the timing of MMAE influences clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2019-2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Non-electively hospitalized SDH patients who received both surgical evacuation and MMAE were included. Patients were stratified into three groups based on MMAE timing: before, same-day (concurrent), or after surgery. Outcomes included discharge disposition, in-hospital complications and mortality, 180-day treatment failure and surgical rescue, hospitalization cost, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariable adjustments were made for baseline characteristics that were different between study groups (p<0.10).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,518 patients, 325 (21.4%) received concurrent MMAE+surgery, 149 (9.8%) MMAE first, and 1,043 (68.7%) surgery first. There were no significant differences in discharge disposition, in-hospital complications, mortality, or 180-day outcomes across timing groups (all p>0.05). However, concurrent MMAE+surgery was associated with shorter LOS (median 5 days) compared to MMAE first (8 days, adjusted p<0.001) and surgery first (8 days, adjusted p<0.001). Moreover, concurrent MMAE+surgey was associated with significantly lower hospitalization costs (median 42,147 USD) compared to MMAE-first (53,536 USD, adjusted p=0.014) and surgery-first (median 53,941 USD, adjusted p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical outcomes were comparable across timing strategies for MMAE as an adjunct to surgery. However, concurrent MMAE+surgery was associated with significantly reduced LOS and hospitalization costs, suggesting logistical and economic advantages for same-day treatment.</p><p><strong>Abbreviations: </strong>MMAE= middle meningeal artery embolization; SDH= subdural hematoma; LOS= length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A9003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Recent randomized trials have suggested that middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an effective treatment for preventing the recurrence of subacute and chronic subdural hematoma (SDH). As such, MMAE is increasingly being adopted as the standard of care worldwide, and it is projected to become the most common neuro-interventional procedure by 2029. While MMAE is an effective surgical adjunct, the optimal timing of MMAE relative to surgical evacuation remains unclear. This study evaluated whether the timing of MMAE influences clinical and healthcare utilization outcomes.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2019-2022 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Non-electively hospitalized SDH patients who received both surgical evacuation and MMAE were included. Patients were stratified into three groups based on MMAE timing: before, same-day (concurrent), or after surgery. Outcomes included discharge disposition, in-hospital complications and mortality, 180-day treatment failure and surgical rescue, hospitalization cost, and length of stay (LOS). Multivariable adjustments were made for baseline characteristics that were different between study groups (p<0.10).

Results: Of 1,518 patients, 325 (21.4%) received concurrent MMAE+surgery, 149 (9.8%) MMAE first, and 1,043 (68.7%) surgery first. There were no significant differences in discharge disposition, in-hospital complications, mortality, or 180-day outcomes across timing groups (all p>0.05). However, concurrent MMAE+surgery was associated with shorter LOS (median 5 days) compared to MMAE first (8 days, adjusted p<0.001) and surgery first (8 days, adjusted p<0.001). Moreover, concurrent MMAE+surgey was associated with significantly lower hospitalization costs (median 42,147 USD) compared to MMAE-first (53,536 USD, adjusted p=0.014) and surgery-first (median 53,941 USD, adjusted p<0.001).

Conclusions: Clinical outcomes were comparable across timing strategies for MMAE as an adjunct to surgery. However, concurrent MMAE+surgery was associated with significantly reduced LOS and hospitalization costs, suggesting logistical and economic advantages for same-day treatment.

Abbreviations: MMAE= middle meningeal artery embolization; SDH= subdural hematoma; LOS= length of stay.

辅助脑膜中动脉栓塞的时机与慢性和亚急性硬膜下血肿手术引流的关系。
背景和目的:最近的随机试验表明,脑膜中动脉栓塞(MMAE)是预防亚急性和慢性硬膜下血肿(SDH)复发的有效治疗方法。因此,MMAE越来越多地被采用为全球的护理标准,预计到2029年,它将成为最常见的神经介入手术。虽然MMAE是一种有效的手术辅助手段,但相对于手术疏散,MMAE的最佳时机仍不清楚。本研究评估MMAE的时机是否会影响临床和医疗保健利用结果。材料和方法:我们使用2019-2022年全国再入院数据库进行了一项回顾性队列研究。非选择性住院的SDH患者同时接受手术疏散和MMAE。根据MMAE时间将患者分为三组:手术前、同一天(同时)或手术后。结果包括出院处理、院内并发症和死亡率、180天治疗失败和手术抢救、住院费用和住院时间(LOS)。对研究组之间不同的基线特征进行多变量调整(结果:1518例患者中,325例(21.4%)同时接受MMAE+手术,149例(9.8%)首先接受MMAE, 1043例(68.7%)首先接受手术。各时间组在出院处置、住院并发症、死亡率或180天结局方面无显著差异(均p < 0.05)。然而,与MMAE首次手术(8天,调整后)相比,MMAE+手术同时进行的LOS(中位5天)更短。结论:MMAE作为手术辅助的临床结果在不同的时间策略上是相似的。然而,同时进行MMAE+手术可显著降低LOS和住院费用,表明当日治疗具有后勤和经济优势。MMAE=脑膜中动脉栓塞术;SDH=硬膜下血肿;LOS=停留时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信