Traci Barnable, Erica Hoogestraat, Donna Hardie, Amy Anderson, Lori Meier, Kellee Dixon, Holly Thomas, Cheryl Wynn, Michael Pate, Jessica LeTexier
{"title":"Impact of In-Facility Nursing Assistant Training on CNA Retention in Long-Term Care.","authors":"Traci Barnable, Erica Hoogestraat, Donna Hardie, Amy Anderson, Lori Meier, Kellee Dixon, Holly Thomas, Cheryl Wynn, Michael Pate, Jessica LeTexier","doi":"10.1097/NND.0000000000001155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health care faces a shortage of direct patient care workers with a projected 3.2 million deficit by 2026. This study examined the impact of an in-facility, employer-paid nursing assistant training program to address certified nursing assistant retention in a Midwest rural health care system. Using a mixed-method retrospective cohort design, researchers compared the retention of program participants (n = 557) and nonparticipants (n = 3,326). Results showed program participants were retained at a 9% higher rate than those trained outside the organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51695,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nurses in Professional Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nurses in Professional Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000001155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Health care faces a shortage of direct patient care workers with a projected 3.2 million deficit by 2026. This study examined the impact of an in-facility, employer-paid nursing assistant training program to address certified nursing assistant retention in a Midwest rural health care system. Using a mixed-method retrospective cohort design, researchers compared the retention of program participants (n = 557) and nonparticipants (n = 3,326). Results showed program participants were retained at a 9% higher rate than those trained outside the organization.