Stéphane L Bouchoucha, Loïc Martin, Emmanuelle Cartron, James J Lucas, Lim Siew Hoon, Karen McKenna, Ana Hutchinson
{"title":"More Than a Barrier: Exploring the Personal and Professional Impact of Personal Protective Equipment Use in Healthcare.","authors":"Stéphane L Bouchoucha, Loïc Martin, Emmanuelle Cartron, James J Lucas, Lim Siew Hoon, Karen McKenna, Ana Hutchinson","doi":"10.1111/nhs.70231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Personal protective equipment used to provide protection to healthcare workers during the pandemic was impacted by shortages in supply and side effects from use. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of personal protective equipment (PPE) side effects experienced by healthcare workers in France, including access to, use of PPE, and PPE training. A cross-sectional descriptive survey was used. Reporting followed the STROBE statement. Three hundred and forty-six participants completed the survey. Most were female (41.2%), nurses (59.7%) and aged between 31 and 45 years old. Surgical masks were associated with side effects (54.6%), including acne (24.05%), pressure injuries (26.49%) and burning/pain (7.62%). N95 respirator use was associated with side effects (30.43%), of acne (11.88%) and abrasions (11.88%). Side effects were most frequently reported by female participants and those working in COVID-19 areas. The side effects caused by PPE use and the impact this has on healthcare workers cannot be underestimated. Findings in this study identify the need to develop preventative measures to reduce side effects and improve patient interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49730,"journal":{"name":"Nursing & Health Sciences","volume":"27 3","pages":"e70231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446744/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing & Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Personal protective equipment used to provide protection to healthcare workers during the pandemic was impacted by shortages in supply and side effects from use. The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of personal protective equipment (PPE) side effects experienced by healthcare workers in France, including access to, use of PPE, and PPE training. A cross-sectional descriptive survey was used. Reporting followed the STROBE statement. Three hundred and forty-six participants completed the survey. Most were female (41.2%), nurses (59.7%) and aged between 31 and 45 years old. Surgical masks were associated with side effects (54.6%), including acne (24.05%), pressure injuries (26.49%) and burning/pain (7.62%). N95 respirator use was associated with side effects (30.43%), of acne (11.88%) and abrasions (11.88%). Side effects were most frequently reported by female participants and those working in COVID-19 areas. The side effects caused by PPE use and the impact this has on healthcare workers cannot be underestimated. Findings in this study identify the need to develop preventative measures to reduce side effects and improve patient interactions.
期刊介绍:
NHS has a multidisciplinary focus and broad scope and a particular focus on the translation of research into clinical practice, inter-disciplinary and multidisciplinary work, primary health care, health promotion, health education, management of communicable and non-communicable diseases, implementation of technological innovations and inclusive multicultural approaches to health services and care.