Human-Centric AI Governance: An Adaptive Public International Law Framework for Ethical and Inclusive AI Regulation in Public Health.

IF 1.7 4区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Farman Saeed Sedeeq, Percem Arman
{"title":"Human-Centric AI Governance: An Adaptive Public International Law Framework for Ethical and Inclusive AI Regulation in Public Health.","authors":"Farman Saeed Sedeeq, Percem Arman","doi":"10.1017/jme.2025.10175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming public health, presenting both opportunities and ethical and legal challenges. This study adopts an interdisciplinary approach, integrating legal doctrinal analysis, public health ethics, AI governance scholarship and a scoping review of international legal instruments to evaluate and operationalize three core pillars: ethical accountability, regulatory adaptability and transparency. Through a scoping review of treaties, regional regulations and policy frameworks, the study maps jurisdictional gaps and proposes an adaptive public law framework that addresses critical shortcomings in existing AI governance models, such as the WHO's limited enforceability and the GDPR's rigid data-sharing rules. The framework introduces scalable, region-specific regulations to enhance interoperability while respecting local governance needs. Its human-centric design, modular regulation and accountability mechanisms ensure adaptability across diverse legal, cultural and health system contexts. Informed by case studies and a thematic synthesis of global best practices, this framework offers policymakers and practitioners a structured yet flexible approach to balancing AI-driven innovation with ethical imperatives, promoting equitable public health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.10175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming public health, presenting both opportunities and ethical and legal challenges. This study adopts an interdisciplinary approach, integrating legal doctrinal analysis, public health ethics, AI governance scholarship and a scoping review of international legal instruments to evaluate and operationalize three core pillars: ethical accountability, regulatory adaptability and transparency. Through a scoping review of treaties, regional regulations and policy frameworks, the study maps jurisdictional gaps and proposes an adaptive public law framework that addresses critical shortcomings in existing AI governance models, such as the WHO's limited enforceability and the GDPR's rigid data-sharing rules. The framework introduces scalable, region-specific regulations to enhance interoperability while respecting local governance needs. Its human-centric design, modular regulation and accountability mechanisms ensure adaptability across diverse legal, cultural and health system contexts. Informed by case studies and a thematic synthesis of global best practices, this framework offers policymakers and practitioners a structured yet flexible approach to balancing AI-driven innovation with ethical imperatives, promoting equitable public health outcomes.

以人为中心的人工智能治理:公共卫生中道德和包容性人工智能监管的适应性国际公法框架。
人工智能(AI)正在改变公共卫生,既带来机遇,也带来道德和法律挑战。本研究采用跨学科方法,将法律理论分析、公共卫生伦理、人工智能治理研究和对国际法律文书的范围审查结合起来,评估和实施三个核心支柱:道德问责制、监管适应性和透明度。通过对条约、地区法规和政策框架的范围审查,该研究绘制了管辖权差距,并提出了一个适应性公法框架,以解决现有人工智能治理模式中的关键缺陷,例如世卫组织有限的可执行性和GDPR严格的数据共享规则。该框架引入了可扩展的、特定于区域的法规,以增强互操作性,同时尊重本地治理需求。其以人为本的设计、模块化监管和问责机制确保了在不同法律、文化和卫生系统背景下的适应性。通过案例研究和对全球最佳做法的专题综合,该框架为决策者和从业者提供了一种结构化但灵活的方法,以平衡人工智能驱动的创新与道德要求,促进公平的公共卫生成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics
Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Material published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics (JLME) contributes to the educational mission of The American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, covering public health, health disparities, patient safety and quality of care, and biomedical science and research. It provides articles on such timely topics as health care quality and access, managed care, pain relief, genetics, child/maternal health, reproductive health, informed consent, assisted dying, ethics committees, HIV/AIDS, and public health. Symposium issues review significant policy developments, health law court decisions, and books.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信