Charlson–Deyo Index Impact on Overall Survival After Surgery for Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
David Herz, Aman M. Patel, George S. Bebawy, Anthony M. Saad, Ghayoour S. Mir, Andrey Filimonov
{"title":"Charlson–Deyo Index Impact on Overall Survival After Surgery for Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma","authors":"David Herz,&nbsp;Aman M. Patel,&nbsp;George S. Bebawy,&nbsp;Anthony M. Saad,&nbsp;Ghayoour S. Mir,&nbsp;Andrey Filimonov","doi":"10.1002/lio2.70259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Objective preoperative risk assessment tools inform physician and patient decision making. Our study examines the relationship between the Charlson–Deyo comorbidity index (CCI) and overall survival (OS) following surgery for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a retrospective cohort study, the 2004–2016 National Cancer Database was used to extract adult patients with pT1-4N0-3 M0 SNSCC undergoing surgery. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox-proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze the impact of CCI on OS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 3307 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 2613 (79.0%) were CCI = 0, 533 (16.1%) were CCI = 1, and 161 (4.9%) were CCI = 2+. On univariate analysis, CCI groups differed by age (42.8% were ≥ 65 years old in CCI = 0 vs. 53.3% and 64.0% in CCI groups 1 and 2+, respectively, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and race (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference between CCI groups in sex, T-stage, N-stage, margin status, primary site, radiation therapy, or systemic therapy. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, 5-year OS for CCI = 0, CCI = 1, and CCI = 2+ was 58.6%, 48.0%, and 42.9%, respectively (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). CCI = 1 (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.99–1.45, <i>p</i> = 0.069) was not associated with worse OS than CCI = 0. CCI = 2+ (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05–1.96, <i>p</i> = 0.025) was associated with worse OS than CCI = 0.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In a cohort of adult patients with SNSCC undergoing surgery, higher CCI was independently associated with worse OS. These findings support the use of CCI as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in SNSCC patients. Future studies should explore how comorbidity burden interacts with frailty and other prognostic factors to refine risk stratification tools.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>4</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48529,"journal":{"name":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lio2.70259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Objective preoperative risk assessment tools inform physician and patient decision making. Our study examines the relationship between the Charlson–Deyo comorbidity index (CCI) and overall survival (OS) following surgery for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC).

Methods

In a retrospective cohort study, the 2004–2016 National Cancer Database was used to extract adult patients with pT1-4N0-3 M0 SNSCC undergoing surgery. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox-proportional hazards modeling were used to analyze the impact of CCI on OS.

Results

Of the 3307 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 2613 (79.0%) were CCI = 0, 533 (16.1%) were CCI = 1, and 161 (4.9%) were CCI = 2+. On univariate analysis, CCI groups differed by age (42.8% were ≥ 65 years old in CCI = 0 vs. 53.3% and 64.0% in CCI groups 1 and 2+, respectively, p < 0.001) and race (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between CCI groups in sex, T-stage, N-stage, margin status, primary site, radiation therapy, or systemic therapy. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, 5-year OS for CCI = 0, CCI = 1, and CCI = 2+ was 58.6%, 48.0%, and 42.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). CCI = 1 (HR 1.20, 95% CI 0.99–1.45, p = 0.069) was not associated with worse OS than CCI = 0. CCI = 2+ (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05–1.96, p = 0.025) was associated with worse OS than CCI = 0.

Conclusions

In a cohort of adult patients with SNSCC undergoing surgery, higher CCI was independently associated with worse OS. These findings support the use of CCI as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in SNSCC patients. Future studies should explore how comorbidity burden interacts with frailty and other prognostic factors to refine risk stratification tools.

Level of Evidence

4

Abstract Image

Charlson-Deyo指数对鼻窦鳞状细胞癌术后总生存率的影响。
目的:客观的术前风险评估工具为医生和患者的决策提供信息。本研究探讨了鼻窦鳞状细胞癌(SNSCC)术后Charlson-Deyo共病指数(CCI)与总生存率(OS)之间的关系。方法:在一项回顾性队列研究中,使用2004-2016年国家癌症数据库提取手术的成年pT1-4N0-3 M0 SNSCC患者。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和cox比例风险模型分析CCI对OS的影响。结果:在符合纳入标准的3307例患者中,CCI = 0的患者2613例(79.0%),CCI = 1的患者533例(16.1%),CCI = 2+的患者161例(4.9%)。在单因素分析中,CCI组存在年龄差异(CCI = 0组≥65岁者占42.8%,CCI 1组和CCI 2+组分别为53.3%和64.0%,p p p p = 0.069),与CCI = 0相比,CCI组的OS较差无相关性。CCI = 2+ (HR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05 ~ 1.96, p = 0.025)与CCI = 0的OS差相关。结论:在接受手术的成年SNSCC患者队列中,较高的CCI与较差的OS独立相关。这些发现支持使用CCI作为SNSCC患者术后预后的预测指标。未来的研究应该探索共病负担如何与虚弱和其他预后因素相互作用,以完善风险分层工具。证据等级:4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
245
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信