Access, Value and Reform: An Analysis of Canada's Pharmaceutical Policy Framework.

Q2 Medicine
Douglas Clark
{"title":"Access, Value and Reform: An Analysis of Canada's Pharmaceutical Policy Framework.","authors":"Douglas Clark","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a rejoinder to an article challenging the pharmaceutical industry's claims that Canada lags in access to innovative drugs due to substandard policies. This rejoinder is in agreement with the article's main argument that Canada succeeds in attracting the new drugs that matter most, and that higher prices or stronger intellectual property protection would have a negligible impact on the timing and degree to which new drugs are launched here generally. At the same time, the rejoinder does acknowledge the legitimacy of the industry's concerns around system inefficiencies stemming from federal-provincial fragmentation but posits that national pharmacare could resolve industry and payer concerns alike. The article calls for thoughtful reform, deeper research into unmet needs and a shift in focus toward patient-relevant outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 4","pages":"29-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This is a rejoinder to an article challenging the pharmaceutical industry's claims that Canada lags in access to innovative drugs due to substandard policies. This rejoinder is in agreement with the article's main argument that Canada succeeds in attracting the new drugs that matter most, and that higher prices or stronger intellectual property protection would have a negligible impact on the timing and degree to which new drugs are launched here generally. At the same time, the rejoinder does acknowledge the legitimacy of the industry's concerns around system inefficiencies stemming from federal-provincial fragmentation but posits that national pharmacare could resolve industry and payer concerns alike. The article calls for thoughtful reform, deeper research into unmet needs and a shift in focus toward patient-relevant outcomes.

准入、价值和改革:加拿大药品政策框架分析。
这是对一篇文章的反驳,该文章挑战了制药行业的说法,即加拿大在获得创新药物方面落后于不合格的政策。这一反驳与文章的主要论点一致,即加拿大成功地吸引了最重要的新药,更高的价格或更强的知识产权保护对新药在这里上市的时间和程度的影响可以忽略不计。与此同时,答辩书确实承认了行业对联邦-省级分散导致的系统效率低下的担忧是合理的,但也假设国家药品保险可以解决行业和付款人的担忧。这篇文章呼吁进行深思熟虑的改革,对未满足的需求进行更深入的研究,并将重点转向与患者相关的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信