Mohammed A. A. Abulela, Daniel P. Jurich, Alex J. Mechaber, Irina Grabovsky
{"title":"Are Physicians' USMLE Scores Associated With Patient Mortality? A Multilevel Modeling Approach to USMLE Predictive Validity Evidence","authors":"Mohammed A. A. Abulela, Daniel P. Jurich, Alex J. Mechaber, Irina Grabovsky","doi":"10.1002/hsr2.71237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Validity evidence for high-stakes licensing examinations, particularly the association between exam scores and clinical practice outcomes, is essential for supporting valid score-based inferences. However, a gap existed in understanding how variability in patient in-hospital mortality is partitioned between physicians and hospitals and how physicians' USMLE composite scores are associated with patient mortality using multilevel modeling. Thus, we examined variability in patient in-hospital mortality between physicians and hospitals and investigated the association between physicians USMLE composite scores and patient mortality, controlling for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Hospitalization data were sourced from the American Medical Association, USMLE program, and Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. Deidentified data included 150,907 patients nested within 1744 physicians in 170 hospitals. Multilevel logistic regression, including a random intercept and six conditional hierarchical models, was used to account for the nested structure and control for covariates. The seven fitted models were compared descriptively and inferentially.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 5% and 12% of the variability in patient mortality was attributable to physicians and hospitals, respectively. A one standard deviation increase in the USMLE composite score significantly predicted a 6% reduction in patient mortality (odds ratio 0.94; 95% CI = 0.89, 0.99), controlling for patient, physician, and hospital covariates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Results highlight variability in mortality attributable to physicians and hospitals and underscore the predictive value of USMLE scores. Higher USMLE composite scores were associated with a lower likelihood of patient in-hospital mortality, providing additional validity evidence for the exam and supporting its use for licensure decisions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36518,"journal":{"name":"Health Science Reports","volume":"8 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440804/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Science Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hsr2.71237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and Aims
Validity evidence for high-stakes licensing examinations, particularly the association between exam scores and clinical practice outcomes, is essential for supporting valid score-based inferences. However, a gap existed in understanding how variability in patient in-hospital mortality is partitioned between physicians and hospitals and how physicians' USMLE composite scores are associated with patient mortality using multilevel modeling. Thus, we examined variability in patient in-hospital mortality between physicians and hospitals and investigated the association between physicians USMLE composite scores and patient mortality, controlling for patient, physician, and hospital characteristics.
Methods
Hospitalization data were sourced from the American Medical Association, USMLE program, and Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council. Deidentified data included 150,907 patients nested within 1744 physicians in 170 hospitals. Multilevel logistic regression, including a random intercept and six conditional hierarchical models, was used to account for the nested structure and control for covariates. The seven fitted models were compared descriptively and inferentially.
Results
Approximately 5% and 12% of the variability in patient mortality was attributable to physicians and hospitals, respectively. A one standard deviation increase in the USMLE composite score significantly predicted a 6% reduction in patient mortality (odds ratio 0.94; 95% CI = 0.89, 0.99), controlling for patient, physician, and hospital covariates.
Conclusion
Results highlight variability in mortality attributable to physicians and hospitals and underscore the predictive value of USMLE scores. Higher USMLE composite scores were associated with a lower likelihood of patient in-hospital mortality, providing additional validity evidence for the exam and supporting its use for licensure decisions.
背景和目的:高风险执照考试的有效性证据,特别是考试分数与临床实践结果之间的关联,对于支持有效的基于分数的推断至关重要。然而,在理解患者住院死亡率的变异性如何在医生和医院之间划分,以及医生的USMLE综合评分如何使用多层次模型与患者死亡率相关联方面存在差距。因此,我们检查了医生和医院之间患者住院死亡率的可变性,并调查了医生USMLE综合评分与患者死亡率之间的关系,控制了患者、医生和医院的特征。方法:住院数据来源于美国医学协会、USMLE计划和宾夕法尼亚州卫生保健成本控制委员会。未确定的数据包括170家医院1744名医生的150907名患者。多水平逻辑回归,包括随机截距和六个条件层次模型,用于解释嵌套结构和控制协变量。对七个拟合模型进行了描述性和推理性比较。结果:大约5%和12%的患者死亡率可变性分别归因于医生和医院。在控制了患者、医生和医院协变量的情况下,USMLE综合评分增加一个标准差显著预测患者死亡率降低6%(优势比0.94;95% CI = 0.89, 0.99)。结论:结果突出了医生和医院死亡率的可变性,并强调了USMLE评分的预测价值。较高的USMLE综合得分与较低的患者住院死亡率相关,为该考试提供了额外的有效性证据,并支持将其用于许可决定。