Mouse model validity for studying the impact of tobacco smoke on the human gut microbiota assessed via in silico and experimental approaches.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Induced Diseases Pub Date : 2025-09-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tid/208251
Irene Victoria Bermúdez-Pérez, Juliana Meißner, Corinna Bang, Jan N Hartmann, John F Baines, Susanne Krauss-Etschmann, Robert Häsler
{"title":"Mouse model validity for studying the impact of tobacco smoke on the human gut microbiota assessed via in silico and experimental approaches.","authors":"Irene Victoria Bermúdez-Pérez, Juliana Meißner, Corinna Bang, Jan N Hartmann, John F Baines, Susanne Krauss-Etschmann, Robert Häsler","doi":"10.18332/tid/208251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The contribution of cigarettes to disease initiation, manifestation and progression is well-established for complex disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease. However, studying its impact on disease pathophysiology in a controlled setting is challenging in humans, resulting in the application of various model systems, amongst them tobacco smoke-exposed mice. While frequently employed, it is unclear to what extent this model reflects human responses to tobacco smoke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Employing a mouse study of experimental nature, we assessed established parameters for monitoring responses to tobacco smoke, paralleled by 16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the murine gut microbiome in n=32 suitable animals. This was supplemented by a case-control study design, based on n=3 publicly available transcriptome datasets, from human oral mucosa, human large airway epithelium and murine lung tissues, where we assessed which components of the response to tobacco smoke observed in mice are functionally comparable to responses seen in humans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed several physiological responses in mice that paralleled human scenarios (weight loss, serum cotinine and Cyp1a1 mRNA expression), serving as a proof of principle. We identified shared microbiome-associated processes: stress related functions were enriched in mice and humans, while other processes, such as inflammatory functions, were discordant. The mouse microbiota showed significant changes in response to tobacco smoke, which mimicked patterns seen in human datasets, such as changes for <i>Lachnospiraceae</i> and <i>Prevotellaceae</i>. In contrast, some families that show significant responses to tobacco smoke in humans, such as <i>Bacteroidaceae</i>, could not be observed in mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Considering the high inter-individual variation in humans and the well-controlled conditions in mice, our results suggest that mice, despite the identified limitations, most likely represent a suitable model for studying specific processes, such as stress responses, in the context of tobacco smoke exposure and its impact on the microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"23 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/208251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The contribution of cigarettes to disease initiation, manifestation and progression is well-established for complex disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease. However, studying its impact on disease pathophysiology in a controlled setting is challenging in humans, resulting in the application of various model systems, amongst them tobacco smoke-exposed mice. While frequently employed, it is unclear to what extent this model reflects human responses to tobacco smoke.

Methods: Employing a mouse study of experimental nature, we assessed established parameters for monitoring responses to tobacco smoke, paralleled by 16S rRNA gene-based profiling of the murine gut microbiome in n=32 suitable animals. This was supplemented by a case-control study design, based on n=3 publicly available transcriptome datasets, from human oral mucosa, human large airway epithelium and murine lung tissues, where we assessed which components of the response to tobacco smoke observed in mice are functionally comparable to responses seen in humans.

Results: We observed several physiological responses in mice that paralleled human scenarios (weight loss, serum cotinine and Cyp1a1 mRNA expression), serving as a proof of principle. We identified shared microbiome-associated processes: stress related functions were enriched in mice and humans, while other processes, such as inflammatory functions, were discordant. The mouse microbiota showed significant changes in response to tobacco smoke, which mimicked patterns seen in human datasets, such as changes for Lachnospiraceae and Prevotellaceae. In contrast, some families that show significant responses to tobacco smoke in humans, such as Bacteroidaceae, could not be observed in mice.

Conclusions: Considering the high inter-individual variation in humans and the well-controlled conditions in mice, our results suggest that mice, despite the identified limitations, most likely represent a suitable model for studying specific processes, such as stress responses, in the context of tobacco smoke exposure and its impact on the microbiota.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过计算机和实验方法评估研究烟草烟雾对人类肠道微生物群影响的小鼠模型有效性。
引言:对于复杂的疾病,如炎症性肠病,香烟对疾病的发生、表现和进展的贡献是公认的。然而,在受控环境下研究其对疾病病理生理的影响在人类中是具有挑战性的,导致各种模型系统的应用,其中包括烟草烟雾暴露的小鼠。虽然经常使用,但尚不清楚该模型在多大程度上反映了人类对烟草烟雾的反应。方法:采用实验性质的小鼠研究,我们评估了监测烟草烟雾反应的既定参数,并对32只合适的小鼠肠道微生物组进行了基于16S rRNA基因的分析。该研究还通过一项病例对照研究设计进行了补充,该研究基于n=3个公开可获得的转录组数据集,这些数据集来自人类口腔黏膜、人类大气道上皮和小鼠肺组织,我们评估了在小鼠中观察到的烟草烟雾反应的哪些成分在功能上与人类的反应相当。结果:我们在小鼠中观察到几种与人类相似的生理反应(体重减轻、血清可替宁和Cyp1a1 mRNA表达),作为原理的证明。我们发现了共同的微生物组相关过程:应激相关功能在小鼠和人类中丰富,而其他过程,如炎症功能,则不一致。小鼠微生物群对烟草烟雾的反应显示出显著的变化,这模仿了人类数据集中看到的模式,例如毛螺科和普氏菌科的变化。相比之下,在人类中对烟草烟雾有明显反应的一些家族,如拟杆菌科,在小鼠中没有观察到。结论:考虑到人类的高度个体间差异和小鼠的良好控制条件,我们的研究结果表明,小鼠尽管存在已知的局限性,但很可能代表了研究烟草烟雾暴露及其对微生物群影响的特定过程(如应激反应)的合适模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Induced Diseases
Tobacco Induced Diseases SUBSTANCE ABUSE-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community. The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信