Development, Implementation, Pharmacokinetic and Safety Evaluation of an Immunotherapeutic Treatment for COVID-19: Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.
Guillermo Alberto Keller, Silvia Miranda, Adolfo Rafael De Roodt, Roxana Salvi, Ivana Colaianni, Elizabeth García, Guillermo Bramuglia, Leandro Calderón, Diego Mazza, Laura Lanari, Oscar Perez, Matias Fingermann, Guillermo Temprano, Guillermo Di Girolamo, Claudio Bonel, José Cristian Dokmetjian
{"title":"Development, Implementation, Pharmacokinetic and Safety Evaluation of an Immunotherapeutic Treatment for COVID-19: Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.","authors":"Guillermo Alberto Keller, Silvia Miranda, Adolfo Rafael De Roodt, Roxana Salvi, Ivana Colaianni, Elizabeth García, Guillermo Bramuglia, Leandro Calderón, Diego Mazza, Laura Lanari, Oscar Perez, Matias Fingermann, Guillermo Temprano, Guillermo Di Girolamo, Claudio Bonel, José Cristian Dokmetjian","doi":"10.14712/23362936.2025.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Passive immunotherapy has been evaluated in many infections. The present study aims to evaluate purified F(ab')2 fraction of equine hyperimmune IgG (anti-SARS-CoV-2) in the treatment of coronavirus lung disease. Patients with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) with World Health Organization (WHO) score 3, 4 or 5 up to 72 hours of evolution from the onset of symptoms were included. They were randomly assigned to anti-SARS-CoV-2 or placebo. Follow-up was performed for 28 days to assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, detection of anti-horse antibodies, circulating cytokines and determination of anti-SARS neutralizing activity. The 20 initial patients (44±14 years) were included. On the third day of treatment there was an improvement (P=0.02) in arterial saturation (95±1.6 vs. 93±2.5%) with increasing differences over time between treatments (day 8: 97±0.1 vs. 94±0.3%). The length of oxygen therapy treatment was 2±0.8 vs. 3±0.9 (0.048) in patients falling within WHO 5 category (no difference to WHO 4). Mean hospitalization was 13±2.5 vs. 14±0.8 days (P=0.095) and time to clinical improvement was 2±0.5 vs. 3±0.9 days (P=0.048) in patients with initial 5 WHO category, with no differences to patients who started with WHO stage 4. The time to nasal swab negativization was 10±2.1 vs. 12±0 day (P=0.015). No adverse reactions or intercurrences were detected. All patients presented heterophile antibodies without clinical correlate. The new treatment shows improvement in arterial saturation (days 3 to 12), and a decrease on detectable viral RNA (days 8 to 11) with good pharmacokinetic and safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":35490,"journal":{"name":"Prague medical report","volume":"126 3","pages":"121-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prague medical report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2025.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Passive immunotherapy has been evaluated in many infections. The present study aims to evaluate purified F(ab')2 fraction of equine hyperimmune IgG (anti-SARS-CoV-2) in the treatment of coronavirus lung disease. Patients with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) with World Health Organization (WHO) score 3, 4 or 5 up to 72 hours of evolution from the onset of symptoms were included. They were randomly assigned to anti-SARS-CoV-2 or placebo. Follow-up was performed for 28 days to assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, detection of anti-horse antibodies, circulating cytokines and determination of anti-SARS neutralizing activity. The 20 initial patients (44±14 years) were included. On the third day of treatment there was an improvement (P=0.02) in arterial saturation (95±1.6 vs. 93±2.5%) with increasing differences over time between treatments (day 8: 97±0.1 vs. 94±0.3%). The length of oxygen therapy treatment was 2±0.8 vs. 3±0.9 (0.048) in patients falling within WHO 5 category (no difference to WHO 4). Mean hospitalization was 13±2.5 vs. 14±0.8 days (P=0.095) and time to clinical improvement was 2±0.5 vs. 3±0.9 days (P=0.048) in patients with initial 5 WHO category, with no differences to patients who started with WHO stage 4. The time to nasal swab negativization was 10±2.1 vs. 12±0 day (P=0.015). No adverse reactions or intercurrences were detected. All patients presented heterophile antibodies without clinical correlate. The new treatment shows improvement in arterial saturation (days 3 to 12), and a decrease on detectable viral RNA (days 8 to 11) with good pharmacokinetic and safety profile.