Canadian Family Physician Preferences on Updating the Classification System for Health Conditions and Related Issues.

Q2 Medicine
Stephanie Garies, Dewdunee Himasara Pathiraja, Kerry A Mcbrien, James A Dickinson, Noah Crampton, Cathy A Eastwood, Danielle A Southern, Kees Van Boven, Huib Ten Napel, Maeve O'beirne, Alexander Singer, Olawunmi Olagundoye, Keith Denny, David J T Campbell, Terrence Mcdonald, Neil Drummond, Hude Quan, Aimie Lee, Michelle Smekal, William A Ghali, Rubee Dev, Tyler Williamson
{"title":"Canadian Family Physician Preferences on Updating the Classification System for Health Conditions and Related Issues.","authors":"Stephanie Garies, Dewdunee Himasara Pathiraja, Kerry A Mcbrien, James A Dickinson, Noah Crampton, Cathy A Eastwood, Danielle A Southern, Kees Van Boven, Huib Ten Napel, Maeve O'beirne, Alexander Singer, Olawunmi Olagundoye, Keith Denny, David J T Campbell, Terrence Mcdonald, Neil Drummond, Hude Quan, Aimie Lee, Michelle Smekal, William A Ghali, Rubee Dev, Tyler Williamson","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physician billing claims are used to inform health system planning and for other secondary purposes. In most provinces/territories, diagnoses are coded using a system adopted in 1979, the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9). This study aimed to understand the perspectives of family physicians on updating ICD-9. Canadian family physicians completed an online patient vignette coding exercise and electronic survey to capture preferences on two newer coding systems (ICD-11; International Classification for Primary Care version 3 [ICPC-3]), compared with the current ICD-9 system. The focus of this paper is the survey data, which were analyzed descriptively. One hundred and sixty-one family physicians from six provinces participated. Over half of them (58%) stated that ICD-9 should be replaced, and 86% of them felt confident learning a new coding system. After the coding exercise, most participants reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with both newer systems (77% for ICD-11; 73% for ICPC-3). Family physicians in our study support replacing the outdated ICD-9 system to better reflect their workload and patient complexity. This paper provides recommendations for provinces/territories considering modernizing physician billing requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 4","pages":"57-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Physician billing claims are used to inform health system planning and for other secondary purposes. In most provinces/territories, diagnoses are coded using a system adopted in 1979, the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9). This study aimed to understand the perspectives of family physicians on updating ICD-9. Canadian family physicians completed an online patient vignette coding exercise and electronic survey to capture preferences on two newer coding systems (ICD-11; International Classification for Primary Care version 3 [ICPC-3]), compared with the current ICD-9 system. The focus of this paper is the survey data, which were analyzed descriptively. One hundred and sixty-one family physicians from six provinces participated. Over half of them (58%) stated that ICD-9 should be replaced, and 86% of them felt confident learning a new coding system. After the coding exercise, most participants reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with both newer systems (77% for ICD-11; 73% for ICPC-3). Family physicians in our study support replacing the outdated ICD-9 system to better reflect their workload and patient complexity. This paper provides recommendations for provinces/territories considering modernizing physician billing requirements.

加拿大家庭医生对更新健康状况和相关问题分类系统的偏好。
医生账单索赔用于告知卫生系统规划和其他次要目的。在大多数省/地区,诊断使用1979年采用的国际疾病分类第9版(ICD-9)系统进行编码。本研究旨在了解家庭医生对ICD-9更新的看法。加拿大家庭医生完成了一项在线患者小短文编码练习和电子调查,以获取对两种较新的编码系统(ICD-11;国际初级保健分类第3版[ICPC-3])的偏好,与目前的ICD-9系统进行比较。本文以调查数据为重点,对调查数据进行了描述性分析。来自6个省份的161名家庭医生参与了调查。超过一半的人(58%)表示应该更换ICD-9, 86%的人有信心学习新的编码系统。在编码练习之后,大多数参与者报告说,他们对两个较新的系统都非常满意或有些满意(ICD-11为77%;ICPC-3为73%)。在我们的研究中,家庭医生支持更换过时的ICD-9系统,以更好地反映他们的工作量和患者的复杂性。本文为考虑现代化医生计费要求的省/地区提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信