The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence, community response, and outcomes in England: An interrupted time series analysis.

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Abraham Contreras, William McIver, Terry Brown, Chen Ji, Scott Booth, Rachael Fothergill, Gavin D Perkins, Keith Couper
{"title":"The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence, community response, and outcomes in England: An interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Abraham Contreras, William McIver, Terry Brown, Chen Ji, Scott Booth, Rachael Fothergill, Gavin D Perkins, Keith Couper","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic had an important effect on the incidence, treatment, and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Previous studies have focused on the immediate impact of the pandemic. We aimed to explore key changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest epidemiology in England over the time-course of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We extracted data from the UK Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes registry on adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients between January 2019 and November 2021 who were treated by an English Emergency Medical Service (EMS). We segmented data into five epochs, of which two epochs were identified as COVID-19 peaks. We explored changes over time in a multiple interrupted-time series model. Pre-specified outcomes were EMS-treated cardiac arrest incidence (per 100,000 population), rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, rate of shockable rhythm, and survival rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 86,891 cases from 10 English Emergency Medical Service systems. There were immediate step changes with increased rates of incidence and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and decreased rates of shockable rhythms and survival at the start of the first peak in March 2020. Subsequently, trend changes within epochs and at each epoch change were variable across the four outcomes. Between peaks and following the second peak, outcomes tended to normalise towards pre-pandemic level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In England, COVID-19 peaks were associated with an immediate effect on key outcomes. At the end of each peak, rates seemed to return toward baseline levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110823"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110823","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: The COVID-19 pandemic had an important effect on the incidence, treatment, and outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Previous studies have focused on the immediate impact of the pandemic. We aimed to explore key changes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest epidemiology in England over the time-course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We extracted data from the UK Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes registry on adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients between January 2019 and November 2021 who were treated by an English Emergency Medical Service (EMS). We segmented data into five epochs, of which two epochs were identified as COVID-19 peaks. We explored changes over time in a multiple interrupted-time series model. Pre-specified outcomes were EMS-treated cardiac arrest incidence (per 100,000 population), rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, rate of shockable rhythm, and survival rate.

Results: We included 86,891 cases from 10 English Emergency Medical Service systems. There were immediate step changes with increased rates of incidence and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and decreased rates of shockable rhythms and survival at the start of the first peak in March 2020. Subsequently, trend changes within epochs and at each epoch change were variable across the four outcomes. Between peaks and following the second peak, outcomes tended to normalise towards pre-pandemic level.

Conclusion: In England, COVID-19 peaks were associated with an immediate effect on key outcomes. At the end of each peak, rates seemed to return toward baseline levels.

COVID-19大流行对英格兰成人院外心脏骤停发生率、社区反应和结果的影响:一项中断时间序列分析
研究目的:COVID-19大流行对院外心脏骤停的发生率、治疗和结局有重要影响。以前的研究集中在大流行的直接影响上。我们的目的是探讨在COVID-19大流行的时间过程中,英格兰院外心脏骤停流行病学的关键变化。方法:我们从英国院外心脏骤停结局登记处提取了2019年1月至2021年11月期间接受英国紧急医疗服务(EMS)治疗的成人院外心脏骤停患者的数据。我们将数据分为五个时期,其中两个时期被确定为COVID-19高峰。我们在多个中断时间序列模型中探索了随时间的变化。预先指定的结果是ems治疗的心脏骤停发生率(每10万人)、旁观者心肺复苏率、休克节律率和生存率。结果:我们纳入了来自英国10个急诊医疗服务系统的86,891例病例。在2020年3月第一个高峰开始时,随着发病率和旁观者心肺复苏率的增加,休克节律和存活率的下降,立即出现了阶段性变化。随后,各时期和各时期的趋势变化在四种结果中是可变的。在高峰之间和第二次高峰之后,结果趋于向大流行前水平正常化。结论:在英格兰,COVID-19的高峰与对关键结果的直接影响有关。在每个高峰结束时,利率似乎都回到了基线水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信