Anticipations and Requirements of Individuals with Long-Term Health Conditions Regarding Self-Management and Digital Health Support Tools.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-09-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S545496
Tourkiah Alessa
{"title":"Anticipations and Requirements of Individuals with Long-Term Health Conditions Regarding Self-Management and Digital Health Support Tools.","authors":"Tourkiah Alessa","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S545496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This research examines the individuals with chronic health conditions who desire self-management support, exploring their views towards digital health for self-management purposes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The researchers conducted an exploratory qualitative investigation through eight focus groups, allocating two groups to each condition: diabetes (groups of seven and six participants), hypertension (groups of six and six), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (groups of six and five), and cardiovascular conditions (groups of five and five). The discussion focused on three areas: 1) how chronic illness affects everyday living; 2) viewpoints and requirements regarding self-management; and 3) expectations, needs, and readiness to use digital health (eHealth) for self-management. The research employed a content-based analytical approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patient groups showed different expectations and needs regarding eHealth and self-management. The diabetes and hypertension groups reported the most needs and perceived benefits, while COPD came next in terms of willingness to use eHealth for self-management. In contrast, cardiovascular patients indicated fewer requirements for self-management support as their condition had a minimal effect on their daily activities. Across all groups, patients favored having the choice to utilize eHealth tools rather than healthcare professionals mandating their use despite the Saudi healthcare system's directive nature. Some participants also saw potential for AI to support self-management, particularly through features like early warnings. Participants believed that eHealth should be enhanced rather than substituted for personal health care, with numerous individuals expressing anxiety about conducting self-measurements and uncertainty regarding appropriate responses to abnormal readings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study revealed differences in requirements and expectations among patient groups regarding self-management and indicates that aspects of eHealth and its implementation should be tailored to individual patients. The anticipated benefits of eHealth to support self-management and perceived disease controllability appeared to significantly influence patients' willingness to adopt eHealth for self-management purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2901-2918"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S545496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: This research examines the individuals with chronic health conditions who desire self-management support, exploring their views towards digital health for self-management purposes.

Materials and methods: The researchers conducted an exploratory qualitative investigation through eight focus groups, allocating two groups to each condition: diabetes (groups of seven and six participants), hypertension (groups of six and six), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (groups of six and five), and cardiovascular conditions (groups of five and five). The discussion focused on three areas: 1) how chronic illness affects everyday living; 2) viewpoints and requirements regarding self-management; and 3) expectations, needs, and readiness to use digital health (eHealth) for self-management. The research employed a content-based analytical approach.

Results: The patient groups showed different expectations and needs regarding eHealth and self-management. The diabetes and hypertension groups reported the most needs and perceived benefits, while COPD came next in terms of willingness to use eHealth for self-management. In contrast, cardiovascular patients indicated fewer requirements for self-management support as their condition had a minimal effect on their daily activities. Across all groups, patients favored having the choice to utilize eHealth tools rather than healthcare professionals mandating their use despite the Saudi healthcare system's directive nature. Some participants also saw potential for AI to support self-management, particularly through features like early warnings. Participants believed that eHealth should be enhanced rather than substituted for personal health care, with numerous individuals expressing anxiety about conducting self-measurements and uncertainty regarding appropriate responses to abnormal readings.

Conclusion: This study revealed differences in requirements and expectations among patient groups regarding self-management and indicates that aspects of eHealth and its implementation should be tailored to individual patients. The anticipated benefits of eHealth to support self-management and perceived disease controllability appeared to significantly influence patients' willingness to adopt eHealth for self-management purposes.

关于自我管理和数字健康支持工具的长期健康状况个人的期望和要求。
背景和目的:本研究调查了渴望自我管理支持的慢性健康状况患者,探索他们对自我管理目的的数字健康的看法。材料和方法:研究人员通过8个焦点小组进行了探索性定性调查,每种情况分为两组:糖尿病(7和6人组)、高血压(6和6人组)、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)(6和5人组)和心血管疾病(5和5人组)。讨论集中在三个方面:1)慢性疾病如何影响日常生活;2)自我管理的观点和要求;3)使用数字健康(eHealth)进行自我管理的期望、需求和准备情况。该研究采用了基于内容的分析方法。结果:不同患者组对电子健康和自我管理的期望和需求不同。糖尿病和高血压组报告了最大的需求和感知到的益处,而COPD在使用电子健康进行自我管理的意愿方面排名第二。相比之下,心血管患者对自我管理支持的需求较少,因为他们的病情对他们的日常活动影响最小。在所有群体中,患者都倾向于选择使用电子健康工具,而不是医疗保健专业人员强制使用,尽管沙特的医疗保健系统具有指示性。一些参与者还看到了人工智能支持自我管理的潜力,特别是通过早期预警等功能。与会者认为,应加强电子保健,而不是取代个人保健,因为许多人对进行自我测量感到焦虑,对异常读数的适当反应也不确定。结论:本研究揭示了患者群体在自我管理方面的需求和期望的差异,并表明电子健康及其实施的各个方面应该针对个体患者量身定制。电子健康在支持自我管理和感知疾病可控性方面的预期益处似乎显著影响了患者采用电子健康进行自我管理的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信