Obesity Medication Treatment Perspectives Among People with Overweight or Obesity.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Patient preference and adherence Pub Date : 2025-09-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PPA.S555622
John W Ostrominski, Anindit Chhibber, Effie L Kuti, Brendan Clark, Bonnie M K Donato
{"title":"Obesity Medication Treatment Perspectives Among People with Overweight or Obesity.","authors":"John W Ostrominski, Anindit Chhibber, Effie L Kuti, Brendan Clark, Bonnie M K Donato","doi":"10.2147/PPA.S555622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obesity is a complex, chronic condition associated with multiple health complications. While obesity medications (OMs), particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), have demonstrated significant clinical benefits, real-world insights into patient experiences with these therapies remain limited. This study evaluated patients' behaviors and experiences with OMs, including their financial impact; and aimed to identify key decision points for seeking and receiving treatment with OMs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals were recruited from a national database to complete a 20-minute online survey between July 8 and July 18, 2024. Eligible participants were adults aged 21 years or older with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, or ≥27 kg/m<sup>2</sup> with at least one obesity-related complication (ORC) and were currently using an OM. Participants reported their experiences with OMs, motivations and barriers for treatment, challenges, interactions with HCPs and financial challenges with OMs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>100 people with obesity (PwO) participated in the survey. The median age of the respondents was 46 years. Most PwO (94%) had at least one comorbidity in addition to overweight/obesity, and 58% were more concerned about obesity compared with other health conditions. Most PwO (91%) were currently using GLP-1RAs and had previously attempted a median of 3 unique weight management strategies prior to OM initiation. Primary drivers for OM initiation were long-term health improvement (58%) and functional enhancement (53%). Major barriers included insurance restrictions (38%), concerns about side effects (37%), and cost (31%). While on OMs, most (88%) PwO reported a positive experience, citing significant benefits on body weight and appetite reduction; 9% were neutral and 3% reported a negative experience. Participants with longer durations of reported treatment more often reported positive experiences (79% among those with ≥6 months of therapy; 51% among those with <6 months of therapy). The study also found that 56% of PwO expected to be on their current OM for a limited period, with 20% anticipating less than a year and 28% anticipating less than two years. The anticipated treatment duration among PwO varied with reported out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Communication with HCPs frequently addressed side effects and administration, but discussions about treatment duration and lifestyle integration were less consistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the multifaceted experiences of PwO in managing obesity, particularly regarding OM use. The findings underscore the importance of early intervention, robust patient-provider communication, equitable access, and financial support to optimize treatment outcomes. Addressing systemic barriers, stigma, education, and access challenges will be essential to maximize the utility of obesity pharmacotherapy in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19972,"journal":{"name":"Patient preference and adherence","volume":"19 ","pages":"2887-2899"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442898/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient preference and adherence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S555622","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a complex, chronic condition associated with multiple health complications. While obesity medications (OMs), particularly GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), have demonstrated significant clinical benefits, real-world insights into patient experiences with these therapies remain limited. This study evaluated patients' behaviors and experiences with OMs, including their financial impact; and aimed to identify key decision points for seeking and receiving treatment with OMs.

Methods: Individuals were recruited from a national database to complete a 20-minute online survey between July 8 and July 18, 2024. Eligible participants were adults aged 21 years or older with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2, or ≥27 kg/m2 with at least one obesity-related complication (ORC) and were currently using an OM. Participants reported their experiences with OMs, motivations and barriers for treatment, challenges, interactions with HCPs and financial challenges with OMs.

Results: 100 people with obesity (PwO) participated in the survey. The median age of the respondents was 46 years. Most PwO (94%) had at least one comorbidity in addition to overweight/obesity, and 58% were more concerned about obesity compared with other health conditions. Most PwO (91%) were currently using GLP-1RAs and had previously attempted a median of 3 unique weight management strategies prior to OM initiation. Primary drivers for OM initiation were long-term health improvement (58%) and functional enhancement (53%). Major barriers included insurance restrictions (38%), concerns about side effects (37%), and cost (31%). While on OMs, most (88%) PwO reported a positive experience, citing significant benefits on body weight and appetite reduction; 9% were neutral and 3% reported a negative experience. Participants with longer durations of reported treatment more often reported positive experiences (79% among those with ≥6 months of therapy; 51% among those with <6 months of therapy). The study also found that 56% of PwO expected to be on their current OM for a limited period, with 20% anticipating less than a year and 28% anticipating less than two years. The anticipated treatment duration among PwO varied with reported out-of-pocket (OOP) costs. Communication with HCPs frequently addressed side effects and administration, but discussions about treatment duration and lifestyle integration were less consistent.

Conclusion: This study highlights the multifaceted experiences of PwO in managing obesity, particularly regarding OM use. The findings underscore the importance of early intervention, robust patient-provider communication, equitable access, and financial support to optimize treatment outcomes. Addressing systemic barriers, stigma, education, and access challenges will be essential to maximize the utility of obesity pharmacotherapy in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

超重或肥胖人群的肥胖药物治疗前景。
背景:肥胖是一种与多种健康并发症相关的复杂慢性疾病。虽然肥胖药物(OMs),特别是GLP-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs),已经显示出显著的临床益处,但对这些疗法的患者体验的真实见解仍然有限。本研究评估了患者使用OMs的行为和经历,包括其经济影响;旨在确定寻求和接受OMs治疗的关键决策点。方法:从国家数据库中招募个人,在2024年7月8日至7月18日期间完成20分钟的在线调查。符合条件的参与者为21岁或以上的成年人,体重指数(BMI)≥30 kg/m2,或≥27 kg/m2,至少有一种肥胖相关并发症(ORC),目前正在使用OM。参与者报告了他们使用OMs的经历、动机和治疗障碍、挑战、与卫生保健提供者的互动以及OMs的财务挑战。结果:100名肥胖患者(pvo)参与了调查。受访者的平均年龄为46岁。大多数PwO(94%)除了超重/肥胖外,至少有一种合并症,58%的人比其他健康状况更关心肥胖。大多数PwO(91%)目前正在使用GLP-1RAs,并且在OM开始之前曾尝试过中位数为3种独特的体重管理策略。OM开始的主要驱动因素是长期健康改善(58%)和功能增强(53%)。主要障碍包括保险限制(38%)、对副作用的担忧(37%)和成本(31%)。而在OMs中,大多数(88%)ppo报告了积极的体验,称其对体重和食欲的减少有显著的好处;9%的人表示中立,3%的人表示有过负面经历。报告治疗持续时间较长的参与者更常报告积极体验(治疗≥6个月的参与者中79%;治疗≥6个月的参与者中51%)。结论:本研究强调了ppo在控制肥胖方面的多面体验,特别是关于OM的使用。研究结果强调了早期干预、强有力的医患沟通、公平获取和财政支持对优化治疗结果的重要性。解决系统性障碍、耻辱感、教育和获取挑战对于在临床实践中最大限度地发挥肥胖药物治疗的效用至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient preference and adherence
Patient preference and adherence MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
354
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Patient Preference and Adherence is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the growing importance of patient preference and adherence throughout the therapeutic continuum. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research, modeling and clinical studies across all therapeutic areas. Patient satisfaction, acceptability, quality of life, compliance, persistence and their role in developing new therapeutic modalities and compounds to optimize clinical outcomes for existing disease states are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, Patient Preference and Adherence will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信