Fasting and Caloric Restriction in Long COVID Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Interventions and Outcomes.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Sandra León-Herrera, Raquel Gómez-Bravo, Marta Sánchez-Castro, Maria Angeliki S Pavlou, Vinicius Jobim Fischer, Djenna Hutmacher, Laura Haeck, Nina Weber, Bárbara Oliván-Blázquez, Rosa Magallón-Botaya, Charles Benoy, Jochen G Schneider
{"title":"Fasting and Caloric Restriction in Long COVID Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Interventions and Outcomes.","authors":"Sandra León-Herrera, Raquel Gómez-Bravo, Marta Sánchez-Castro, Maria Angeliki S Pavlou, Vinicius Jobim Fischer, Djenna Hutmacher, Laura Haeck, Nina Weber, Bárbara Oliván-Blázquez, Rosa Magallón-Botaya, Charles Benoy, Jochen G Schneider","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the emergence of COVID-19, many patients continue to experience symptoms beyond the acute phase, a condition now termed long COVID syndrome (LCS). The complexity of LCS, with its varied symptoms, makes diagnosis and treatment challenging. Recent evidence suggests that dietary approaches, such as fasting and caloric restriction, may help in management of these symptoms. However, research on these interventions remains limited and preliminary.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this review we aimed to explore existing studies on the impacts of fasting and caloric restriction for LCS management, focusing on how these approaches might alleviate symptoms through mechanisms like reduced inflammation, enhanced autophagy, and better metabolic health. Additionally, we examined intervention types, reported outcomes, and gaps in the research to guide future studies of LCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using databases like PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect for studies published from 2019 to 2024, following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A range of study types, including case series, narrative reviews, randomized controlled trial protocols, and public guidance documents, were included. Data were descriptively compiled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, covering interventions such as intermittent and prolonged fasting, as well as caloric restriction, with durations from days to weeks. Some reported benefits included reductions in fatigue, cognitive impairment, and inflammatory symptoms such as joint pain, muscle pain, or chest tightness. However, the findings reported here are preliminary and limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up, and varied protocols and outcomes, underscoring the need for further standardized research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fasting and caloric restriction have shown potential benefits in managing LCS symptoms like fatigue, cognitive decline, and inflammatory symptoms. Nonetheless, the diversity of study designs and outcomes necessitates more rigorous research to confirm the effectiveness and safety of interventions for LCS management. Future studies should focus on long-term effects and biological mechanisms and include broader, more diverse populations to enhance generalizability and support clinical guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the emergence of COVID-19, many patients continue to experience symptoms beyond the acute phase, a condition now termed long COVID syndrome (LCS). The complexity of LCS, with its varied symptoms, makes diagnosis and treatment challenging. Recent evidence suggests that dietary approaches, such as fasting and caloric restriction, may help in management of these symptoms. However, research on these interventions remains limited and preliminary.

Objectives: In this review we aimed to explore existing studies on the impacts of fasting and caloric restriction for LCS management, focusing on how these approaches might alleviate symptoms through mechanisms like reduced inflammation, enhanced autophagy, and better metabolic health. Additionally, we examined intervention types, reported outcomes, and gaps in the research to guide future studies of LCS.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using databases like PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect for studies published from 2019 to 2024, following the Arksey and O'Malley framework and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A range of study types, including case series, narrative reviews, randomized controlled trial protocols, and public guidance documents, were included. Data were descriptively compiled.

Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria, covering interventions such as intermittent and prolonged fasting, as well as caloric restriction, with durations from days to weeks. Some reported benefits included reductions in fatigue, cognitive impairment, and inflammatory symptoms such as joint pain, muscle pain, or chest tightness. However, the findings reported here are preliminary and limited by small sample sizes, short follow-up, and varied protocols and outcomes, underscoring the need for further standardized research.

Conclusions: Fasting and caloric restriction have shown potential benefits in managing LCS symptoms like fatigue, cognitive decline, and inflammatory symptoms. Nonetheless, the diversity of study designs and outcomes necessitates more rigorous research to confirm the effectiveness and safety of interventions for LCS management. Future studies should focus on long-term effects and biological mechanisms and include broader, more diverse populations to enhance generalizability and support clinical guidance.

长冠状病毒综合征的禁食和热量限制:干预措施和结果的范围综述
背景:自COVID-19出现以来,许多患者在急性期之后继续出现症状,这种情况现在称为长COVID综合征(LCS)。LCS的复杂性及其各种症状使诊断和治疗具有挑战性。最近的证据表明,饮食方法,如禁食和热量限制,可能有助于管理这些症状。然而,对这些干预措施的研究仍然有限和初步。目的:在本综述中,我们旨在探讨禁食和热量限制对LCS管理影响的现有研究,重点关注这些方法如何通过减少炎症、增强自噬和改善代谢健康等机制缓解症状。此外,我们检查了干预类型、报告的结果和研究中的差距,以指导LCS的未来研究。方法:使用PubMed、Scopus和ScienceDirect等数据库对2019年至2024年发表的研究进行系统检索,遵循Arksey和O'Malley框架和用于系统评价和meta分析扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)指南的首选报告项目。纳入了一系列研究类型,包括病例系列、叙述性综述、随机对照试验方案和公共指导文件。对数据进行描述性汇编。结果:11项研究符合纳入标准,包括间歇性和长时间禁食以及热量限制等干预措施,持续时间从几天到几周不等。一些报道的益处包括减轻疲劳、认知障碍和炎症症状,如关节痛、肌肉痛或胸闷。然而,本文报道的研究结果是初步的,受样本量小、随访时间短、方案和结果不同的限制,强调了进一步标准化研究的必要性。结论:禁食和热量限制在控制LCS症状(如疲劳、认知能力下降和炎症症状)方面显示出潜在的益处。然而,研究设计和结果的多样性需要更严格的研究来确认LCS管理干预措施的有效性和安全性。未来的研究应侧重于长期效应和生物学机制,并包括更广泛、更多样化的人群,以提高普遍性和支持临床指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信