Trajectories of Nonrestorative Sleep in First-year College Students: The Roles of Childhood Emotional Abuse and Resilience.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nature and Science of Sleep Pub Date : 2025-09-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NSS.S552062
Wenna Liao, Xianghan Luo, Yongpeng Sun, Fanxu Kong, Zengjie Ye
{"title":"Trajectories of Nonrestorative Sleep in First-year College Students: The Roles of Childhood Emotional Abuse and Resilience.","authors":"Wenna Liao, Xianghan Luo, Yongpeng Sun, Fanxu Kong, Zengjie Ye","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S552062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nonrestorative sleep (NRS) is common among college students; however, its temporal changes and predictors are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify NRS trajectories among first-year Chinese college students and to examine how childhood emotional abuse (EA) and resilience predict these trajectories.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six hundred and fourteen first-year Chinese college students were enrolled in a 12-month longitudinal tracking study, assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form, 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Morning and Evening Questionnaire-5, and NRS Scale (NRSS). Data were analyzed employing latent growth curve modeling, latent class growth modeling, and multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The global score of NRSS (higher scores indicate fewer symptoms of NRS) showed a linear increase overall. EA predicted poorer restorative sleep at baseline (β = -0.255, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Resilience predicted better restorative sleep over time (β<sub>T0</sub> = 0.271, β<sub>T1</sub> = 0.327, β<sub>T2</sub> = 0.292, all <i>p</i> < 0.001). Latent class analysis identified two NRSS trajectories: (a) high-increasing class (41.5% of the sample; declining NRS) and (b) low-stable class (58.5%; persistent high NRS). Higher levels of EA corresponded to greater likelihood of belonging to the low-stable class relative to the high-increasing class (OR=1.177, 95% CI [1.106, 1.252]). In contrast, higher resilience corresponded to lower likelihood of being in the low-stable class (OR=0.915, 95% CI [0.890, 0.941]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EA is a predisposing factor for NRS among college students, while resilience is a protective factor for restorative sleep. It is essential to consider EA and resilience in any intervention efforts to reduce NRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"17 ","pages":"2223-2235"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S552062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Nonrestorative sleep (NRS) is common among college students; however, its temporal changes and predictors are poorly understood. This study aimed to identify NRS trajectories among first-year Chinese college students and to examine how childhood emotional abuse (EA) and resilience predict these trajectories.

Methods: Six hundred and fourteen first-year Chinese college students were enrolled in a 12-month longitudinal tracking study, assessed by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form, 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, Morning and Evening Questionnaire-5, and NRS Scale (NRSS). Data were analyzed employing latent growth curve modeling, latent class growth modeling, and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: The global score of NRSS (higher scores indicate fewer symptoms of NRS) showed a linear increase overall. EA predicted poorer restorative sleep at baseline (β = -0.255, p < 0.001). Resilience predicted better restorative sleep over time (βT0 = 0.271, βT1 = 0.327, βT2 = 0.292, all p < 0.001). Latent class analysis identified two NRSS trajectories: (a) high-increasing class (41.5% of the sample; declining NRS) and (b) low-stable class (58.5%; persistent high NRS). Higher levels of EA corresponded to greater likelihood of belonging to the low-stable class relative to the high-increasing class (OR=1.177, 95% CI [1.106, 1.252]). In contrast, higher resilience corresponded to lower likelihood of being in the low-stable class (OR=0.915, 95% CI [0.890, 0.941]).

Conclusion: EA is a predisposing factor for NRS among college students, while resilience is a protective factor for restorative sleep. It is essential to consider EA and resilience in any intervention efforts to reduce NRS.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

一年级大学生的非恢复性睡眠轨迹:童年情绪虐待和心理弹性的作用。
目的:非恢复性睡眠(NRS)在大学生中普遍存在;然而,人们对其时间变化和预测因素了解甚少。本研究旨在确定中国一年级大学生的NRS轨迹,并探讨童年情绪虐待和心理韧性如何预测这些轨迹。方法:对614名中国大学生进行为期12个月的纵向跟踪研究,采用《儿童创伤简易问卷》、《Connor-Davidson弹性量表》、《早晚问卷5》和《NRS量表》进行评估。数据分析采用潜在增长曲线模型、潜在类别增长模型和多变量逻辑回归。结果:NRS总体得分(得分越高,NRS症状越少)总体呈线性增加。EA预测基线时恢复性睡眠较差(β = -0.255, p < 0.001)。随着时间的推移,弹性预测更好的恢复性睡眠(βT0 = 0.271, βT1 = 0.327, βT2 = 0.292,均p < 0.001)。潜在类别分析确定了两种NRSS轨迹:(a)高增长类别(41.5%的样本,NRS下降)和(b)低稳定类别(58.5%,持续高NRS)。EA水平越高,相对于高增长类别,属于低稳定类别的可能性越大(OR=1.177, 95% CI[1.106, 1.252])。相反,较高的弹性对应于较低的低稳定类别的可能性(OR=0.915, 95% CI[0.890, 0.941])。结论:EA是大学生NRS的诱发因素,而弹性是恢复性睡眠的保护因素。在任何减少NRS的干预措施中,都必须考虑EA和弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature and Science of Sleep
Nature and Science of Sleep Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
245
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep. Specific topics covered in the journal include: The functions of sleep in humans and other animals Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep The genetics of sleep and sleep differences The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness Sleep changes with development and with age Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause) The science and nature of dreams Sleep disorders Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health) The microbiome and sleep Chronotherapy Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信