Contribution of the CAESARE tool in the management of non-reassuring fetal status at risk of acidosis

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Simon Hubert , Océane Brodbeck , Fares Ghrairi , Amjad Kattini , Jan Chrusciel , Stéphane Sanchez
{"title":"Contribution of the CAESARE tool in the management of non-reassuring fetal status at risk of acidosis","authors":"Simon Hubert ,&nbsp;Océane Brodbeck ,&nbsp;Fares Ghrairi ,&nbsp;Amjad Kattini ,&nbsp;Jan Chrusciel ,&nbsp;Stéphane Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.103037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Developed in 2020, the CAESARE tool is a decision-support tool for interpreting fetal heart rate (FHR). In a preliminary study, the use of CAESARE led to a significant reduction in caesarean section rates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We assessed the ability of the CAESARE tool to predict acidosis earlier by reducing the time-to-intervention in cases of non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS). We performed a retrospective, single-center case-control analysis evaluating associations between CAESARE scoring and the onset of neonatal acidosis. The primary outcome was presence or absence of fetal acidosis at birth based on CAESARE score. The case population was patients whose fetuses had fetal heart rate abnormalities and an arterial pH &lt; 7.00 at birth. The control population was patients who had fetal heart rate abnormalities without the fetuses having acidosis at birth.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CAESARE influenced decisions regarding the continuation of labor. It was associated with increased end of labor in the case group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and greater expectant management in the control group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). CAESARE sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.88, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, 32.1% of neonatal acidosis cases could have potentially been avoided if CAESARE had been used. The tool enabled extended expectant management in 42% of cases where end of labor was recommended. These findings support the implementation of a procedure for improved FHR analysis practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 10","pages":"Article 103037"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784725001345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Developed in 2020, the CAESARE tool is a decision-support tool for interpreting fetal heart rate (FHR). In a preliminary study, the use of CAESARE led to a significant reduction in caesarean section rates.

Methods

We assessed the ability of the CAESARE tool to predict acidosis earlier by reducing the time-to-intervention in cases of non-reassuring fetal status (NRFS). We performed a retrospective, single-center case-control analysis evaluating associations between CAESARE scoring and the onset of neonatal acidosis. The primary outcome was presence or absence of fetal acidosis at birth based on CAESARE score. The case population was patients whose fetuses had fetal heart rate abnormalities and an arterial pH < 7.00 at birth. The control population was patients who had fetal heart rate abnormalities without the fetuses having acidosis at birth.

Results

CAESARE influenced decisions regarding the continuation of labor. It was associated with increased end of labor in the case group (p < 0.01) and greater expectant management in the control group (p < 0.01). CAESARE sensitivity and specificity were 0.97 and 0.88, respectively.

Conclusion

In our study, 32.1% of neonatal acidosis cases could have potentially been avoided if CAESARE had been used. The tool enabled extended expectant management in 42% of cases where end of labor was recommended. These findings support the implementation of a procedure for improved FHR analysis practices.
剖宫产工具在处理不稳定胎儿状态的酸中毒风险中的作用。
CAESARE工具于2020年开发,是一种决策支持工具,用于解释胎儿心率(FHR)。在初步研究中,使用CAESARE可显著降低剖宫产率。方法:我们评估了CAESARE工具通过减少非安心胎儿状态(NRFS)病例的干预时间来早期预测酸中毒的能力。我们进行了一项回顾性、单中心病例对照分析,评估CAESARE评分与新生儿酸中毒发病之间的关系。主要结局是基于CAESARE评分的出生时是否存在胎儿酸中毒。病例人群为出生时胎儿心率异常且动脉pH < 7.00的患者。对照组为没有出生时发生酸中毒的胎儿心率异常的患者。结果:剖腹产影响了是否继续分娩的决定。结论:在我们的研究中,32.1%的新生儿酸中毒病例如果使用剖腹产是可以避免的。该工具在42%建议结束分娩的病例中延长了预期管理。这些发现支持了FHR分析实践改进程序的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
210
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信