What are the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Human Fertility Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-19 DOI:10.1080/14647273.2025.2553529
Francesca Taylor-Phillips, Georgina Forshall, Georgina Jones, Rhys Turner-Moore
{"title":"What are the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.","authors":"Francesca Taylor-Phillips, Georgina Forshall, Georgina Jones, Rhys Turner-Moore","doi":"10.1080/14647273.2025.2553529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, there has been an increase in people using websites, social media groups and mobile apps to connect with potential sperm donors or recipients. We undertook a systematic review of existing research which sought to: explore the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms; assess the quality of the existing literature; identify gaps in the evidence base; and make recommendations for future research. Ten academic and grey literature databases and search engines (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Core, Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, NICE Evidence, Open Grey and Google) were searched in December 2019 and again in June 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and we undertook a thematic synthesis of the findings. The searches produced 18,614 results, of which 30 reports were included in the synthesis. The reports were published between 2010 and 2024, by authors from nine countries, and were qualitative (<i>n =</i> 19), quantitative (<i>n =</i> 7) and mixed methods (<i>n =</i> 4) in design. Four themes and two subthemes pertaining to participants' motivations and experiences were constructed from the data. The themes demonstrate that OSD is an improvised practice that is laden with stigma and can produce imbalances of power between donors and recipients. The findings point to a need for further research, including prospective research, to be undertaken with more diverse samples, including populations in the Global South, Black and minority ethnic populations, and inexperienced donors.</p>","PeriodicalId":13006,"journal":{"name":"Human Fertility","volume":"28 1","pages":"2553529"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2025.2553529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been an increase in people using websites, social media groups and mobile apps to connect with potential sperm donors or recipients. We undertook a systematic review of existing research which sought to: explore the characteristics, motivations and experiences of people who use online sperm donation platforms; assess the quality of the existing literature; identify gaps in the evidence base; and make recommendations for future research. Ten academic and grey literature databases and search engines (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Core, Google Scholar, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, NICE Evidence, Open Grey and Google) were searched in December 2019 and again in June 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and we undertook a thematic synthesis of the findings. The searches produced 18,614 results, of which 30 reports were included in the synthesis. The reports were published between 2010 and 2024, by authors from nine countries, and were qualitative (n = 19), quantitative (n = 7) and mixed methods (n = 4) in design. Four themes and two subthemes pertaining to participants' motivations and experiences were constructed from the data. The themes demonstrate that OSD is an improvised practice that is laden with stigma and can produce imbalances of power between donors and recipients. The findings point to a need for further research, including prospective research, to be undertaken with more diverse samples, including populations in the Global South, Black and minority ethnic populations, and inexperienced donors.

使用在线捐精平台的人的特点、动机和经历是什么?系统审查和专题综合。
近年来,越来越多的人使用网站、社交媒体群和移动应用程序与潜在的精子捐赠者或接受者联系。我们对现有研究进行了系统回顾,旨在:探索使用在线捐精平台的人的特征、动机和经历;评估现有文献的质量;确定证据基础中的差距;并为未来的研究提出建议。10个学术和灰色文献数据库和搜索引擎(MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Scopus、Core、谷歌Scholar、Open Access Theses and disserthesis、NICE Evidence、Open grey和谷歌)分别于2019年12月和2024年6月进行了检索。使用混合方法评估工具评估了研究的质量,并对研究结果进行了专题综合。这些搜索产生了18,614个结果,其中30个报告被纳入了综合报告。这些报告发表于2010年至2024年间,作者来自9个国家,在设计上采用定性(n = 19)、定量(n = 7)和混合方法(n = 4)。从数据中构建了四个主题和两个副主题,这些主题与参与者的动机和经历有关。这些主题表明,OSD是一种带有污名的临时做法,可能造成捐助方和受援方之间的权力不平衡。研究结果表明,需要进一步的研究,包括前瞻性研究,以更多样化的样本进行,包括全球南方的人口,黑人和少数民族人口,以及没有经验的捐助者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Fertility
Human Fertility OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Human Fertility is a leading international, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice in the areas of human fertility and infertility. Topics included span the range from molecular medicine to healthcare delivery, and contributions are welcomed from professionals and academics from the spectrum of disciplines concerned with human fertility. It is published on behalf of the British Fertility Society. The journal also provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed articles arising out of the activities of the Association of Biomedical Andrologists, the Association of Clinical Embryologists, the Association of Irish Clinical Embryologists, the British Andrology Society, the British Infertility Counselling Association, the Irish Fertility Society and the Royal College of Nursing Fertility Nurses Group. All submissions are welcome. Articles considered include original papers, reviews, policy statements, commentaries, debates, correspondence, and reports of sessions at meetings. The journal also publishes refereed abstracts from the meetings of the constituent organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信