A Set of Rapid Diagnostic Tool for Babesia microti Infection.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Yanan Bai, Shangdi Zhang, Qindong Liang, Xinxin Zhang, Zeen Liu, Yuxin Ye, Jianxun Luo, Hong Yin, Chongge You, Guiquan Guan, Jinming Wang
{"title":"A Set of Rapid Diagnostic Tool for Babesia microti Infection.","authors":"Yanan Bai, Shangdi Zhang, Qindong Liang, Xinxin Zhang, Zeen Liu, Yuxin Ye, Jianxun Luo, Hong Yin, Chongge You, Guiquan Guan, Jinming Wang","doi":"10.1002/jcla.70102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human babesiosis caused by Babesia microti is an emerging tick-borne zoonosis, with a global pooled prevalence of 2.23% and regional peaks in Europe (4.17%) and North America (1.54%). Traditional diagnostics like microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) suffer from low sensitivity in low-parasitemia cases or high costs ($230/test), necessitating accessible, rapid assays for resource-limited regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-priming amplification combined with vertical flow visualization (CPA-VF) assay, a straightforward molecular method targeting the 18S rRNA gene of B. microti, requires minimal equipment and facilitates rapid detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity/Specificity: The CPA-VF assay detected 2.56 fg/reaction (equivalent to 0.000004% parasitic red blood cells), with a sensitivity of 95.5% matching that of RT-PCR but at a 60-fold lower cost ($3.8/test). It showed no cross-reactivity with B. duncani, B. divergens, or Plasmodium. Clinical Validation: Testing 49 positive samples (19 experimentally infected mice +30 artificially spiked) and 492 field samples, CPA-VF demonstrated 95.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 88.2-98.7) and 95.5% specificity compared to nested PCR (nPCR). Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) was 2.1%-7.2% and inter-assay kappa coefficient was 0.94, confirming reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPA-VF is a rapid, low-cost ($3.8/test), and instrument-free diagnostic tool for B. microti, particularly suitable for endemic regions where timely diagnosis reduces mortality risks from misdiagnosis as malaria. Its portability and visual readout address critical gaps in resource-constrained settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":15509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"e70102"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.70102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Human babesiosis caused by Babesia microti is an emerging tick-borne zoonosis, with a global pooled prevalence of 2.23% and regional peaks in Europe (4.17%) and North America (1.54%). Traditional diagnostics like microscopy and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) suffer from low sensitivity in low-parasitemia cases or high costs ($230/test), necessitating accessible, rapid assays for resource-limited regions.

Methods: A cross-priming amplification combined with vertical flow visualization (CPA-VF) assay, a straightforward molecular method targeting the 18S rRNA gene of B. microti, requires minimal equipment and facilitates rapid detection.

Results: Sensitivity/Specificity: The CPA-VF assay detected 2.56 fg/reaction (equivalent to 0.000004% parasitic red blood cells), with a sensitivity of 95.5% matching that of RT-PCR but at a 60-fold lower cost ($3.8/test). It showed no cross-reactivity with B. duncani, B. divergens, or Plasmodium. Clinical Validation: Testing 49 positive samples (19 experimentally infected mice +30 artificially spiked) and 492 field samples, CPA-VF demonstrated 95.5% sensitivity (95% CI: 88.2-98.7) and 95.5% specificity compared to nested PCR (nPCR). Intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) was 2.1%-7.2% and inter-assay kappa coefficient was 0.94, confirming reliability.

Conclusion: CPA-VF is a rapid, low-cost ($3.8/test), and instrument-free diagnostic tool for B. microti, particularly suitable for endemic regions where timely diagnosis reduces mortality risks from misdiagnosis as malaria. Its portability and visual readout address critical gaps in resource-constrained settings.

一套微型巴贝虫感染快速诊断工具。
背景:由微小巴贝斯虫引起的人类巴贝斯虫病是一种新兴的蜱传人畜共患病,全球总流行率为2.23%,欧洲(4.17%)和北美(1.54%)为区域高峰。显微镜和聚合酶链反应(PCR)等传统诊断方法在低寄生虫血症病例中灵敏度低或费用高(230美元/次),因此需要为资源有限的地区提供可获得的快速检测方法。方法:交叉引物扩增结合垂直流动可视化(CPA-VF)检测是一种针对微孢子虫18S rRNA基因的简单分子检测方法,设备少,易于快速检测。结果:灵敏度/特异性:CPA-VF法检测2.56 fg/反应(相当于0.000004%的寄生红细胞),灵敏度为95.5%,与RT-PCR相匹配,但成本低60倍(3.8美元/次)。与邓肯双歧杆菌、发散双歧杆菌和疟原虫无交叉反应。临床验证:与巢式PCR (nPCR)相比,CPA-VF检测49份阳性样本(19只实验感染小鼠+30只人工添加)和492份现场样本,灵敏度为95.5% (95% CI: 88.2-98.7),特异性为95.5%。试验内变异系数(CV)为2.1% ~ 7.2%,试验间kappa系数为0.94,可靠性较好。结论:CPA-VF是一种快速、低成本(3.8美元/次)且无需仪器的微型贝氏杆菌诊断工具,特别适用于及时诊断可降低误诊为疟疾死亡风险的流行地区。它的便携性和可视化读出解决了资源受限环境中的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis publishes original articles on newly developing modes of technology and laboratory assays, with emphasis on their application in current and future clinical laboratory testing. This includes reports from the following fields: immunochemistry and toxicology, hematology and hematopathology, immunopathology, molecular diagnostics, microbiology, genetic testing, immunohematology, and clinical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信