Primary Tumor Failure After Definitive Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Brief Report on the Implications for NRG LU-008.
Cole Friedes, Nikhil Yegya-Raman, Michelle Iocolano, William P Levin, Keith A Cengel, Jeffrey D Bradley, Steven J Feigenberg
{"title":"Primary Tumor Failure After Definitive Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Brief Report on the Implications for NRG LU-008.","authors":"Cole Friedes, Nikhil Yegya-Raman, Michelle Iocolano, William P Levin, Keith A Cengel, Jeffrey D Bradley, Steven J Feigenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Locoregional failure (LRF) after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small cell cancer is suboptimal. LU-008 aims to improve local control through an stereotactic body radiation therapy boost. We quantified first-failure patterns after modern chemoradiation and determined whether patients with LRF had LU-008 eligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Consecutive adults treated with definitive chemoradiation (>60 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fraction ± immunotherapy) from 2011 to 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. First progression was classified as isolated LRF, isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF; LRF was subclassified as primary tumor failure (PTF), regional failure (RF), or PTF + RF. PTF was defined radiographically within the 90% isodose of the primary tumor gross tumor volume. LU-008 eligibility (tumor <7 cm, ≥1 node, primary >2 cm from nodal clinical tumor volume) was applied retrospectively. Cumulative incidence functions used Fine-Gray models with death as a competing risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 786 patients (median follow-up 66.9 months), 484 first failures occurred: 109 isolated LRF, 122 synchronous LRF + DF, and 253 isolated DF. Isolated PTF occurred in 40 patients (5.1%); PTF + RF in 29 (3.7%). Five-year cumulative incidence was 52% for any DF, 42% for any LRF, 25% for any isolated LRF (DF-free), 17% for any PTF (PTF + RF, DF-free), and 10% for isolated PTF. Only 28 of 69 PTF-containing LRFs (41%) met LU-008 criteria. Failure patterns were similar for patients who received immunotherapy consolidation. Overall, 129 of 231 patients with any LRF (56%) were LU-008-ineligible, commonly due to central or ultracentral primaries, and experienced earlier PTF (median, 12.1 vs 22.4 months; P = .002). PTF risk increased steeply with primary tumor gross tumor volume up to ∼200 cm<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although DF is the most common site of failure, LRF remains a problem. Many PTFs after chemoradiation occur in patients who would be excluded from LU-008, mainly because of central-tumor location. This high-risk subset of central primaries may require alternative escalation or combined modality strategies beyond the proposed LU-008 paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Locoregional failure (LRF) after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small cell cancer is suboptimal. LU-008 aims to improve local control through an stereotactic body radiation therapy boost. We quantified first-failure patterns after modern chemoradiation and determined whether patients with LRF had LU-008 eligibility.
Methods and materials: Consecutive adults treated with definitive chemoradiation (>60 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fraction ± immunotherapy) from 2011 to 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. First progression was classified as isolated LRF, isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF; LRF was subclassified as primary tumor failure (PTF), regional failure (RF), or PTF + RF. PTF was defined radiographically within the 90% isodose of the primary tumor gross tumor volume. LU-008 eligibility (tumor <7 cm, ≥1 node, primary >2 cm from nodal clinical tumor volume) was applied retrospectively. Cumulative incidence functions used Fine-Gray models with death as a competing risk.
Results: Among 786 patients (median follow-up 66.9 months), 484 first failures occurred: 109 isolated LRF, 122 synchronous LRF + DF, and 253 isolated DF. Isolated PTF occurred in 40 patients (5.1%); PTF + RF in 29 (3.7%). Five-year cumulative incidence was 52% for any DF, 42% for any LRF, 25% for any isolated LRF (DF-free), 17% for any PTF (PTF + RF, DF-free), and 10% for isolated PTF. Only 28 of 69 PTF-containing LRFs (41%) met LU-008 criteria. Failure patterns were similar for patients who received immunotherapy consolidation. Overall, 129 of 231 patients with any LRF (56%) were LU-008-ineligible, commonly due to central or ultracentral primaries, and experienced earlier PTF (median, 12.1 vs 22.4 months; P = .002). PTF risk increased steeply with primary tumor gross tumor volume up to ∼200 cm2.
Conclusions: Although DF is the most common site of failure, LRF remains a problem. Many PTFs after chemoradiation occur in patients who would be excluded from LU-008, mainly because of central-tumor location. This high-risk subset of central primaries may require alternative escalation or combined modality strategies beyond the proposed LU-008 paradigm.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.