Advantages of fully automated AI-enhanced algorithm (5D CNS+™) for generating a fetal neurosonogram in clinical routine.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Jann Lennard Scharf, Michael Gembicki, Achim Rody, Amrei Welp, Jan Weichert
{"title":"Advantages of fully automated AI-enhanced algorithm (5D CNS+™) for generating a fetal neurosonogram in clinical routine.","authors":"Jann Lennard Scharf, Michael Gembicki, Achim Rody, Amrei Welp, Jan Weichert","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2025-0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to demonstrate superiority of a fully vs. semi-automated approach (5D CNS+™) and to verify operators could handle and benefit from a fully automated rendering volumetric datasets to generate a complete fetal neurosonogram.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 136 stored three-dimensional (3D) volumes of the brain of unselected, structurally normal fetuses were examined. Two operators applied both software versions for detailed assessment of the fetal central nervous system (CNS). The procession time was measured for each operator and for both program versions. The number of correctly calibrated planes were evaluated and necessity for manual adjustment of the planes was registered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.507 (0.307-0.648) for semi-automated and 0.782 (0.693-0.846) for fully automated 5D CNS+™. The acquisition time of application for semi-automated 5D CNS+™ was 27.70 s ± 6.28 s for operator 1 and 33.20 s ± 9.67 s for operator 2, for fully automated 5D CNS+™ 10.89 s ± 0.85 s for operator 1 and 10.79 s ± 0.60 s for operator 2 (p<0.0001). The statistical analysis for manually corrected planes by both operators between both software algorithms showed a Bland-Altman-Bias of 1.44/9 planes for operator 1 and 1.45/9 planes for operator 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The fully automated 5D CNS+™ algorithm applied on 3D volume datasets provides examiners regardless their expertise not only enormous time efficiency, but also diagnostic confidence in evaluating details of the fetal CNS. This tremendously simplifies application in clinical routine.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2025-0188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective was to demonstrate superiority of a fully vs. semi-automated approach (5D CNS+™) and to verify operators could handle and benefit from a fully automated rendering volumetric datasets to generate a complete fetal neurosonogram.

Methods: A total of 136 stored three-dimensional (3D) volumes of the brain of unselected, structurally normal fetuses were examined. Two operators applied both software versions for detailed assessment of the fetal central nervous system (CNS). The procession time was measured for each operator and for both program versions. The number of correctly calibrated planes were evaluated and necessity for manual adjustment of the planes was registered.

Results: The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.507 (0.307-0.648) for semi-automated and 0.782 (0.693-0.846) for fully automated 5D CNS+™. The acquisition time of application for semi-automated 5D CNS+™ was 27.70 s ± 6.28 s for operator 1 and 33.20 s ± 9.67 s for operator 2, for fully automated 5D CNS+™ 10.89 s ± 0.85 s for operator 1 and 10.79 s ± 0.60 s for operator 2 (p<0.0001). The statistical analysis for manually corrected planes by both operators between both software algorithms showed a Bland-Altman-Bias of 1.44/9 planes for operator 1 and 1.45/9 planes for operator 2.

Conclusions: The fully automated 5D CNS+™ algorithm applied on 3D volume datasets provides examiners regardless their expertise not only enormous time efficiency, but also diagnostic confidence in evaluating details of the fetal CNS. This tremendously simplifies application in clinical routine.

全自动人工智能增强算法(5D CNS+™)在临床常规中生成胎儿神经超声图的优势。
目的:目的是证明全自动方法与半自动方法(5D CNS+™)的优越性,并验证操作人员可以处理并受益于全自动绘制体积数据集来生成完整的胎儿神经超声图。方法:对未选择的、结构正常的胎儿136个存储的脑三维体积进行检查。两名操作人员应用这两种软件版本对胎儿中枢神经系统(CNS)进行详细评估。测量了每个操作员和两个程序版本的处理时间。评估了正确校准平面的数量,并记录了手动调整平面的必要性。结果:半自动化5D CNS+™类内相关系数为0.507(0.307-0.648),全自动5D CNS+™类内相关系数为0.782(0.693-0.846)。半自动5D CNS+™的采集时间,操作人员1为27.70 s±6.28 s,操作人员2为33.20 s±9.67 s,全自动5D CNS+™的采集时间,操作人员1为10.89 s±0.85 s,操作人员2为10.79 s±0.60 s(结论:应用于3D体积数据集的全自动5D CNS+™算法不仅为检查人员提供了巨大的时间效率,而且在评估胎儿CNS的细节方面提供了诊断的信心。这极大地简化了临床常规的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信