{"title":"Development of a Novel TLC Identification Test for \"Rosemary Oil\" and \"Rosemary Water\" Listed in the Japanese Standards of Quasi-Drug Ingredients.","authors":"Taichi Yoshitomi, Takaaki Ando, Yuu Uchida, Takahiro Iwahashi, Chikako Hada, Nahoko Uchiyama","doi":"10.1248/cpb.c25-00277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rosemary oil (RO) and rosemary water (RW) are widely used ingredients in cosmetics. According to the Japanese Standards of Quasi-Drug Ingredients (JSQDI), RO is defined as an essential oil obtained by the steam distillation of fresh rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) leaves, branches, and flowers, whereas RW is the water layer obtained from the steam distillation of the leaves. Although the JSQDI outlines a specific TLC identification test for RW, this test is time-consuming (15-cm development distance) and requires the use of hazardous reagents (toluene). Additionally, no identification tests are available for RO. This study therefore aimed to establish a new TLC-based identification test for RO in JSQDI, while also improving the RW identification test. Using cyclohexane/methyl tert-butyl ether/acetonitrile (20 : 10 : 1) as the developing solvent and 4-methoxybenzaldehyde sulfuric acid as the visualization reagent, 1,8-cineole and borneol were universally detected in 19 RO market products. Thus, 1,8-cineole was selected as the primary marker compound and borneol as the secondary marker compound. Additionally, the extraction process was optimized by applying these TLC conditions to RW, significantly simplifying the process. TLC analysis of the RW market products confirmed the presence of 1,8-cineole in all samples. Thus, in addition to representing a novel method for the identification of RO, these results indicate the suitability of the new extraction conditions for use as an alternative method to identify RW.</p>","PeriodicalId":9773,"journal":{"name":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","volume":"73 9","pages":"843-851"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical & pharmaceutical bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c25-00277","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rosemary oil (RO) and rosemary water (RW) are widely used ingredients in cosmetics. According to the Japanese Standards of Quasi-Drug Ingredients (JSQDI), RO is defined as an essential oil obtained by the steam distillation of fresh rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) leaves, branches, and flowers, whereas RW is the water layer obtained from the steam distillation of the leaves. Although the JSQDI outlines a specific TLC identification test for RW, this test is time-consuming (15-cm development distance) and requires the use of hazardous reagents (toluene). Additionally, no identification tests are available for RO. This study therefore aimed to establish a new TLC-based identification test for RO in JSQDI, while also improving the RW identification test. Using cyclohexane/methyl tert-butyl ether/acetonitrile (20 : 10 : 1) as the developing solvent and 4-methoxybenzaldehyde sulfuric acid as the visualization reagent, 1,8-cineole and borneol were universally detected in 19 RO market products. Thus, 1,8-cineole was selected as the primary marker compound and borneol as the secondary marker compound. Additionally, the extraction process was optimized by applying these TLC conditions to RW, significantly simplifying the process. TLC analysis of the RW market products confirmed the presence of 1,8-cineole in all samples. Thus, in addition to representing a novel method for the identification of RO, these results indicate the suitability of the new extraction conditions for use as an alternative method to identify RW.
期刊介绍:
The CPB covers various chemical topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields dealing with biologically active compounds, natural products, and medicines, while BPB deals with a wide range of biological topics in the pharmaceutical and health sciences fields including scientific research from basic to clinical studies. For details of their respective scopes, please refer to the submission topic categories below.
Topics: Organic chemistry
In silico science
Inorganic chemistry
Pharmacognosy
Health statistics
Forensic science
Biochemistry
Pharmacology
Pharmaceutical care and science
Medicinal chemistry
Analytical chemistry
Physical pharmacy
Natural product chemistry
Toxicology
Environmental science
Molecular and cellular biology
Biopharmacy and pharmacokinetics
Pharmaceutical education
Chemical biology
Physical chemistry
Pharmaceutical engineering
Epidemiology
Hygiene
Regulatory science
Immunology and microbiology
Clinical pharmacy
Miscellaneous.