Rasch analysis of the NEI-VFQ-25: vision-related quality of life in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy after lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy.

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Benson S Chen, Stéphanie Perot, Magali Taiel, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Mike Horton
{"title":"Rasch analysis of the NEI-VFQ-25: vision-related quality of life in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy after lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy.","authors":"Benson S Chen, Stéphanie Perot, Magali Taiel, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Mike Horton","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) for measuring vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy receiving lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy in three Phase III randomised controlled clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VRQoL was assessed using the NEI-VFQ-25 at baseline (n=174) and 2 years after treatment (n=152). All participants received lenadogene nolparvovec in at least one eye. The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 was evaluated for fit to the Rasch model, and a post hoc revision was created and psychometrically reevaluated. Stacked analysis was conducted to compare Rasch-revised scores at baseline and 2 years after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original NEI-VFQ-25 exhibited multiple issues including limitations in response functioning and scale dimensionality. These issues were rectified by revising the NEI-VFQ25 into two separate unidimensional scales measuring 'Vision-related Activity Limitation' (VAL) and 'Socioemotional Functioning' (SEF). Participants' mean VAL score at baseline on a Rasch-transformed 0-100 scale was 46.1 (11.7), improving to 48.4 (13.7) after treatment (<i>F</i>(1, 324) = 2.67, p=0.103). On the SEF scale, there was a significant difference 2 years after treatment, with participants improving from a mean score of 40.1 (14.1) at baseline to 49.6 (17.6) (<i>F</i>(1, 324) = 29.1, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 has limitations that undermine its psychometric validity as a measure of VRQoL. Using the Rasch-revised NEI-VFQ-25, we determined that improvement in VRQoL after treatment with lenadogene nolparvovec was driven predominantly by an improvement in socioemotional functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) for measuring vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy receiving lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy in three Phase III randomised controlled clinical trials.

Methods: VRQoL was assessed using the NEI-VFQ-25 at baseline (n=174) and 2 years after treatment (n=152). All participants received lenadogene nolparvovec in at least one eye. The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 was evaluated for fit to the Rasch model, and a post hoc revision was created and psychometrically reevaluated. Stacked analysis was conducted to compare Rasch-revised scores at baseline and 2 years after treatment.

Results: The original NEI-VFQ-25 exhibited multiple issues including limitations in response functioning and scale dimensionality. These issues were rectified by revising the NEI-VFQ25 into two separate unidimensional scales measuring 'Vision-related Activity Limitation' (VAL) and 'Socioemotional Functioning' (SEF). Participants' mean VAL score at baseline on a Rasch-transformed 0-100 scale was 46.1 (11.7), improving to 48.4 (13.7) after treatment (F(1, 324) = 2.67, p=0.103). On the SEF scale, there was a significant difference 2 years after treatment, with participants improving from a mean score of 40.1 (14.1) at baseline to 49.6 (17.6) (F(1, 324) = 29.1, p<0.001).

Conclusions: The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 has limitations that undermine its psychometric validity as a measure of VRQoL. Using the Rasch-revised NEI-VFQ-25, we determined that improvement in VRQoL after treatment with lenadogene nolparvovec was driven predominantly by an improvement in socioemotional functioning.

NEI-VFQ-25的Rasch分析:lenadogene nolparvovec基因治疗后Leber遗传性视神经病变的视力相关生活质量。
目的:本研究旨在评估美国国家眼科研究所视力功能问卷(NEI-VFQ-25)在三个III期随机对照临床试验中用于测量接受lenadogene nolparvovec基因治疗的Leber遗传性视神经病变患者视力相关生活质量(VRQoL)的适用性。方法:采用NEI-VFQ-25在基线(n=174)和治疗后2年(n=152)评估VRQoL。所有参与者至少一只眼睛接受lenadogene nolparvovec治疗。评估原始NEI-VFQ-25的评分结构是否符合Rasch模型,并创建事后修订并进行心理测量学重新评估。采用堆叠分析比较基线和治疗后2年的rasch -修订版评分。结果:原来的NEI-VFQ-25存在多种问题,包括反应功能和量表维度的限制。通过将NEI-VFQ25修改为两个单独的单维量表来测量“视觉相关活动限制”(VAL)和“社会情绪功能”(SEF),这些问题得到了纠正。参与者在rasch转换0-100量表上的基线平均VAL评分为46.1(11.7),治疗后改善至48.4 (13.7)(F(1,324) = 2.67, p=0.103)。在SEF量表上,治疗2年后存在显著差异,参与者从基线时的平均得分40.1(14.1)提高到49.6 (17.6)(F(1,324) = 29.1, p)。结论:原始NEI-VFQ-25的评分结构存在局限性,破坏了其作为VRQoL测量的心理测量效度。使用rasch修订的NEI-VFQ-25,我们确定lenadogene nolparvovec治疗后VRQoL的改善主要是由社会情绪功能的改善驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信