Intraoperative Ventilatory Strategies in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Silvia Coppola, Bruno Pastene, Isabella Fratti, Mert Sentürk, Ebru Emre Demirel, Marc Leone, Davide Alberto Chiumello
{"title":"Intraoperative Ventilatory Strategies in Patients Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Silvia Coppola, Bruno Pastene, Isabella Fratti, Mert Sentürk, Ebru Emre Demirel, Marc Leone, Davide Alberto Chiumello","doi":"10.1007/s12325-025-03369-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) are commonly used in thoracic surgery, yet postoperative complications still occur in up to 10% of the patients. The aim of our narrative review was to summarize the best available evidence on mechanical ventilation settings, particularly with regard positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection, tidal volume (VT) and ventilation mode, as well as the feasibility of two-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery using VATS or RATS techniques. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed database using the terms \"VATS\" or \"RATS\" and \"ventilation\" between 1 January 2007 and 1 February 2025. Publications were screened by title or abstract. We discussed studies according to their methodological quality, ventilation mode, as well as the feasibility of two-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery using VATS or RATS techniques. In patients receiving one-lung ventilation (OLV), the application of a protective lung ventilation using an intermediate VT ranged between 5 and 8 ml (mL) of predicted body weight (PBW) and a PEEP of 5-8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O was not found to be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and improved hospital outcomes. Titrating PEEP based on mechanical properties appears to enhance perioperative oxygenation and ventilatory mechanics and to reduce postoperative pneumonia. However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding ventilation modes, because only few studies have compared the same low VT using different pressure versus volume control modes. The feasibility of two-lung ventilation during specific thoracic surgery procedures has recently been positively evaluated, with no differences in postoperative complications found. The level of evidence for the ventilatory settings in patients undergoing VATS or RATS remains low. In conclusion, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to determine whether certain intraoperative ventilatory strategies can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-025-03369-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) are commonly used in thoracic surgery, yet postoperative complications still occur in up to 10% of the patients. The aim of our narrative review was to summarize the best available evidence on mechanical ventilation settings, particularly with regard positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) selection, tidal volume (VT) and ventilation mode, as well as the feasibility of two-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery using VATS or RATS techniques. We searched the MEDLINE/PubMed database using the terms "VATS" or "RATS" and "ventilation" between 1 January 2007 and 1 February 2025. Publications were screened by title or abstract. We discussed studies according to their methodological quality, ventilation mode, as well as the feasibility of two-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery using VATS or RATS techniques. In patients receiving one-lung ventilation (OLV), the application of a protective lung ventilation using an intermediate VT ranged between 5 and 8 ml (mL) of predicted body weight (PBW) and a PEEP of 5-8 cmH2O was not found to be associated with a lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and improved hospital outcomes. Titrating PEEP based on mechanical properties appears to enhance perioperative oxygenation and ventilatory mechanics and to reduce postoperative pneumonia. However, no conclusions can be drawn regarding ventilation modes, because only few studies have compared the same low VT using different pressure versus volume control modes. The feasibility of two-lung ventilation during specific thoracic surgery procedures has recently been positively evaluated, with no differences in postoperative complications found. The level of evidence for the ventilatory settings in patients undergoing VATS or RATS remains low. In conclusion, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to determine whether certain intraoperative ventilatory strategies can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients.

电视胸外科手术患者术中通气策略:一篇叙述性综述。
视频辅助胸外科手术(VATS)和机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)在胸外科手术中常用,但术后并发症仍有高达10%的患者发生。我们的叙述性综述的目的是总结关于机械通气设置的最佳证据,特别是关于呼气末正压(PEEP)选择、潮气量(VT)和通气模式,以及胸外科手术患者使用VATS或RATS技术进行双肺通气的可行性。我们在MEDLINE/PubMed数据库中检索了2007年1月1日至2025年2月1日期间的“VATS”或“RATS”和“ventilation”。出版物按标题或摘要筛选。我们根据研究方法的质量、通气方式以及在胸外科手术患者中使用VATS或RATS技术进行双肺通气的可行性进行了讨论。在接受单肺通气(OLV)的患者中,使用预测体重(PBW) 5- 8ml (ml)的中间VT和5- 8cmh2o的PEEP进行保护性肺通气,未发现与降低术后肺部并发症发生率和改善医院预后相关。根据力学特性滴定PEEP似乎可以增强围手术期氧合和通气力学,并减少术后肺炎。然而,没有结论可以得出关于通气模式,因为只有很少的研究比较相同的低VT使用不同的压力和容积控制模式。在特定的胸外科手术过程中,双肺通气的可行性最近得到了积极的评价,在术后并发症方面没有发现差异。在接受VATS或RATS的患者中进行通气设置的证据水平仍然很低。总之,需要大型随机对照试验(rct)来确定某些术中通气策略是否可以减少患者术后肺部并发症(PPCs)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信