Endodontic treatment and management of patients under antiresorptive treatment: a scoping review on MRONJ risk.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Giulio Zavalloni, Andrea Spinelli, Martina Coppini, Rodolfo Mauceri, Giuseppina Campisi, Jacopo Lenzi, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi, Carlo Prati, Fausto Zamparini
{"title":"Endodontic treatment and management of patients under antiresorptive treatment: a scoping review on MRONJ risk.","authors":"Giulio Zavalloni, Andrea Spinelli, Martina Coppini, Rodolfo Mauceri, Giuseppina Campisi, Jacopo Lenzi, Maria Giovanna Gandolfi, Carlo Prati, Fausto Zamparini","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06543-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To summarize the current scientific evidence on the implications of root canal treatment (RCT) in patients receiving antiresorptive therapy and to outline best practices for managing such cases to prevent MRONJ.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A search strategy across PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus was performed. Clinical studies and reports on RCTs in patients on antiresorptive therapy were screened by two independent reviewers. Data on patient factors (sex, age, disease, treatment, outcome) and tooth-related aspects (procedure, diagnosis, anesthesia, irrigation, obturation, antibiotics) were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 514 studies identified, 15 articles (133 patients) met inclusion criteria. One prospective study included 65 patients and 96 RCTs; the remaining patients were reported in case reports or series and in two retrospective studies. Endodontic protocols varied largely across studies. The most common indications for RCT were pulpitis (n = 62) and periapical lesions with acute endodontic diseases (n = 119). All patients were undergoing antiresorptive therapy with oral or intravenous bisphosphonates for the management of osteoporosis or oncologic conditions. RCT was performed in all cases using conventional protocols that included local anesthesia (in some cases without vasoconstrictors), mechanical instrumentation, chemical irrigation (most commonly with sodium hypochlorite) and root canal obturation. Five studies reported antibiotic use. The cases of MRONJ (n = 7, 5.3%; mean treatment duration was 49 months) appeared only in oncological patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCT appears to be a safe procedure for patients receiving bisphosphonates. Cases in which RCT appeared to act as a trigger for MRONJ are rare and ambiguous and seem primarily associated with procedural errors or high-risk patients. Although some recommendations for endodontic practice to prevent MRONJ have been proposed, there is a clear need for further research in this area.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Dentists can safely perform RCT in patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Some clinical recommendations based on the available literature are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 10","pages":"466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12449421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06543-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To summarize the current scientific evidence on the implications of root canal treatment (RCT) in patients receiving antiresorptive therapy and to outline best practices for managing such cases to prevent MRONJ.

Materials and methods: A search strategy across PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus was performed. Clinical studies and reports on RCTs in patients on antiresorptive therapy were screened by two independent reviewers. Data on patient factors (sex, age, disease, treatment, outcome) and tooth-related aspects (procedure, diagnosis, anesthesia, irrigation, obturation, antibiotics) were extracted.

Results: Of the 514 studies identified, 15 articles (133 patients) met inclusion criteria. One prospective study included 65 patients and 96 RCTs; the remaining patients were reported in case reports or series and in two retrospective studies. Endodontic protocols varied largely across studies. The most common indications for RCT were pulpitis (n = 62) and periapical lesions with acute endodontic diseases (n = 119). All patients were undergoing antiresorptive therapy with oral or intravenous bisphosphonates for the management of osteoporosis or oncologic conditions. RCT was performed in all cases using conventional protocols that included local anesthesia (in some cases without vasoconstrictors), mechanical instrumentation, chemical irrigation (most commonly with sodium hypochlorite) and root canal obturation. Five studies reported antibiotic use. The cases of MRONJ (n = 7, 5.3%; mean treatment duration was 49 months) appeared only in oncological patients.

Conclusions: RCT appears to be a safe procedure for patients receiving bisphosphonates. Cases in which RCT appeared to act as a trigger for MRONJ are rare and ambiguous and seem primarily associated with procedural errors or high-risk patients. Although some recommendations for endodontic practice to prevent MRONJ have been proposed, there is a clear need for further research in this area.

Clinical relevance: Dentists can safely perform RCT in patients undergoing bisphosphonate therapy. Some clinical recommendations based on the available literature are provided.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

抗吸收治疗患者的根管治疗和管理:MRONJ风险的范围综述。
目的:总结目前关于接受抗吸收治疗的患者进行根管治疗(RCT)的科学证据,并概述管理此类病例以预防MRONJ的最佳实践。材料和方法:对PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus进行检索。抗吸收治疗患者的临床研究和随机对照试验报告由两位独立审稿人进行筛选。提取患者因素(性别、年龄、疾病、治疗、结果)和牙齿相关方面(手术、诊断、麻醉、冲洗、封闭、抗生素)的数据。结果:在纳入的514项研究中,15篇文章(133例患者)符合纳入标准。一项前瞻性研究包括65例患者和96项随机对照试验;其余患者在病例报告或系列研究和两项回顾性研究中报告。不同研究的牙髓治疗方案差异很大。RCT最常见的适应症是牙髓炎(62例)和急性牙髓疾病的根尖周病变(119例)。所有患者均接受口服或静脉注射双膦酸盐抗吸收治疗,以治疗骨质疏松症或肿瘤疾病。所有病例均采用常规方案进行随机对照试验,包括局部麻醉(部分病例不使用血管收缩剂)、机械器械、化学冲洗(最常见的是次氯酸钠)和根管封闭。五项研究报告了抗生素的使用。MRONJ病例(n = 7, 5.3%,平均治疗时间49个月)仅出现在肿瘤患者中。结论:随机对照试验对于接受双膦酸盐治疗的患者似乎是一种安全的方法。RCT表现为触发MRONJ的病例是罕见和模糊的,似乎主要与程序错误或高风险患者有关。虽然已经提出了一些牙髓治疗预防MRONJ的建议,但显然需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究。临床相关性:牙医可以安全地对接受双膦酸盐治疗的患者进行随机对照试验。根据现有文献提供了一些临床建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信