Risk factors for cleft lip and palate in the Czech population - a double center study.

Q4 Medicine
W Urbanová-, M Večeřová, J Vokurková, L Streit, J Vašáková-, A Leger, O Košková
{"title":"Risk factors for cleft lip and palate in the Czech population - a double center study.","authors":"W Urbanová-, M Večeřová, J Vokurková, L Streit, J Vašáková-, A Leger, O Košková","doi":"10.48095/ccachp202592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orofacial clefts (OFC) are common congenital anomalies with complex genetic and environmental etiologies. Although multiple risk factors have been suggested, their role in cleft type and severity remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the relationship between environmental and maternal health factors (body mass index - BMI, parental age, infection, stress, prenatal vitamin supplementation) and the occurrence and severity of cleft types in the Czech population, as well as the effectiveness of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 96 parents of children with nonsyndromic OFC born between 2017 and 2024 in the Czech Republic were surveyed using a custom online questionnaire (RoRis). The data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test (a = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The distribution of cleft types in this Czech sample was consistent with international data. Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound was established in 55% of cases. The highest detection rates were observed for bilateral cleft lip and palate, with 100% of cases diagnosed prenatally, and for unilateral cleft lip and palate, with a 93% detection rate. In contrast, cleft palate only (CPO) was the most frequently missed, with 88% of cases undetected. No significant associations were found neither between the cleft type nor the severity of clefts and parental age, maternal BMI, medication use, infection with fever, or stress during pregnancy. Most mothers had a normal BMI (51%), and 85% reported prenatal supplement use. COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was reported in 13 cases, but no clear link with cleft severity was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While several exogenous factors were studied, no significant associations neither with cleft type nor severity were found. The study highlights the limitations of prenatal screening diagnosis by ultrasound, particularly for CPO, and supports the need for further research into modifiable risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":7098,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","volume":"67 2","pages":"92-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp202592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orofacial clefts (OFC) are common congenital anomalies with complex genetic and environmental etiologies. Although multiple risk factors have been suggested, their role in cleft type and severity remains unclear.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the relationship between environmental and maternal health factors (body mass index - BMI, parental age, infection, stress, prenatal vitamin supplementation) and the occurrence and severity of cleft types in the Czech population, as well as the effectiveness of prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound.

Methods: A total of 96 parents of children with nonsyndromic OFC born between 2017 and 2024 in the Czech Republic were surveyed using a custom online questionnaire (RoRis). The data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test (a = 0.05).

Results: The distribution of cleft types in this Czech sample was consistent with international data. Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound was established in 55% of cases. The highest detection rates were observed for bilateral cleft lip and palate, with 100% of cases diagnosed prenatally, and for unilateral cleft lip and palate, with a 93% detection rate. In contrast, cleft palate only (CPO) was the most frequently missed, with 88% of cases undetected. No significant associations were found neither between the cleft type nor the severity of clefts and parental age, maternal BMI, medication use, infection with fever, or stress during pregnancy. Most mothers had a normal BMI (51%), and 85% reported prenatal supplement use. COVID-19 infection during pregnancy was reported in 13 cases, but no clear link with cleft severity was found.

Conclusion: While several exogenous factors were studied, no significant associations neither with cleft type nor severity were found. The study highlights the limitations of prenatal screening diagnosis by ultrasound, particularly for CPO, and supports the need for further research into modifiable risk factors.

捷克人口中唇腭裂的危险因素——双中心研究。
背景:口面裂(OFC)是一种常见的先天性异常,具有复杂的遗传和环境病因。尽管多种危险因素已被提出,但它们在唇裂类型和严重程度中的作用仍不清楚。目的:本研究旨在评估捷克人群中环境和孕产妇健康因素(体重指数- BMI、父母年龄、感染、压力、产前维生素补充)与唇裂类型发生和严重程度的关系,以及产前超声诊断的有效性。方法:采用定制在线问卷(RoRis)对捷克共和国2017年至2024年出生的96名非综合征性OFC儿童的父母进行调查。采用Fisher精确检验对数据进行分析(a = 0.05)。结果:捷克样本的唇裂类型分布与国际数据一致。产前超声诊断成功率为55%。双侧唇腭裂的检出率最高,产前诊断率为100%,单侧唇腭裂的检出率为93%。相比之下,单纯腭裂(CPO)是最常见的漏诊,88%的病例未被发现。没有发现唇裂类型和严重程度与父母年龄、母亲体重指数、药物使用、感染发烧或怀孕期间的压力有显著关联。大多数母亲的身体质量指数正常(51%),85%的母亲报告产前服用了补充剂。据报道,怀孕期间感染COVID-19的病例有13例,但未发现与唇裂严重程度有明确联系。结论:虽然研究了几种外源性因素,但没有发现与唇裂类型和严重程度有显著相关性。该研究强调了超声产前筛查诊断的局限性,特别是对CPO,并支持对可改变的危险因素进行进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta chirurgiae plasticae
Acta chirurgiae plasticae Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信