{"title":"Advocacy Education in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Results of a National Survey of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Fellowship Programs.","authors":"Laura Willing, Ellen Goldman","doi":"10.1007/s40596-025-02219-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Advocacy education is an important competency in physician education. The medical education literature includes several examples of advocacy curricula in graduate medical education programs, but few in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs. The authors describe a survey they conducted on the state of advocacy education in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In October 2024, the authors sent a survey to child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship program directors. The web-based survey asked questions regarding the purpose of the curriculum/advocacy experience, learning objectives, types of content, teaching formats, faculty, assessment of learning, and facilitators and barriers to the curriculum/learning experiences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 33 child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship directors who responded to the survey, 27 (82% of respondents) indicated having advocacy experiences or curricula. The most common purposes of the advocacy experiences were to \"gain awareness of child mental health systems-level issues,\" \"learn about health policy/health laws and regulations,\" \"gain confidence and learn advocacy skills,\" and \"learn how to influence policy.\" The most common types of educational content in the advocacy experience/curriculum were \"legislative advocacy skills\" and \"social determinants of health/health equity.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of respondents indicated having advocacy education in their child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs. The survey sheds light on common purposes of this training, types of educational content, teaching formats, and common barriers and facilitators to advocacy education in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":7069,"journal":{"name":"Academic Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-025-02219-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Advocacy education is an important competency in physician education. The medical education literature includes several examples of advocacy curricula in graduate medical education programs, but few in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs. The authors describe a survey they conducted on the state of advocacy education in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs.
Methods: In October 2024, the authors sent a survey to child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship program directors. The web-based survey asked questions regarding the purpose of the curriculum/advocacy experience, learning objectives, types of content, teaching formats, faculty, assessment of learning, and facilitators and barriers to the curriculum/learning experiences.
Results: Of the 33 child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship directors who responded to the survey, 27 (82% of respondents) indicated having advocacy experiences or curricula. The most common purposes of the advocacy experiences were to "gain awareness of child mental health systems-level issues," "learn about health policy/health laws and regulations," "gain confidence and learn advocacy skills," and "learn how to influence policy." The most common types of educational content in the advocacy experience/curriculum were "legislative advocacy skills" and "social determinants of health/health equity."
Conclusions: The majority of respondents indicated having advocacy education in their child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs. The survey sheds light on common purposes of this training, types of educational content, teaching formats, and common barriers and facilitators to advocacy education in child and adolescent psychiatry fellowship programs.
期刊介绍:
Academic Psychiatry is the international journal of the American Association of Chairs of Departments of Psychiatry, American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training, Association for Academic Psychiatry, and Association of Directors of Medical Student Education in Psychiatry.
Academic Psychiatry publishes original, scholarly work in psychiatry and the behavioral sciences that focuses on innovative education, academic leadership, and advocacy.
The scope of the journal includes work that furthers knowledge and stimulates evidence-based advances in academic psychiatry in the following domains: education and training, leadership and administration, career and professional development, ethics and professionalism, and health and well-being.